Posted on 02/13/2020 6:04:30 AM PST by Kaslin
The "expert" predictions of economic disaster should Donald Trump win the 2016 election did not occur. Under Trump, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq composite have reached historical highs while unemployment for blacks and Hispanics have hit historical lows. In the wake of Trump's undeniable economic success, what is the 2020 Democratic Party argument for why voters should back their candidate over Trump?
The morning after Trump's election, Paul Krugman, economics professor and columnist for The New York Times, wrote: "Now comes the mother of all adverse effects -- and what it brings with it is a regime that will be ignorant of economic policy and hostile to any effort to make it work. Effective fiscal support for the Fed? Not a chance. In fact, you can bet that the Fed will lose its independence, and be bullied by cranks. So we are very probably looking at a global recession, with no end in sight. I suppose we could get lucky somehow. But on economics, as on everything else, a terrible thing has just happened."
During the 2016 campaign, Mark Cuban, billionaire owner of the NBA Dallas Mavericks, predicted that a Trump victory could cause not just a minor stock market decline, but one as high as 20% or more: "When you're flip-flopping, when you're not sure what the candidate's going to say from one thing to another, that uncertainty potentially as the president of the United States -- that's the last thing Wall Street wants to hear. I can say with 100% certainty that there is a really good chance we could see a huge, huge correction. ... It could be 20%. You know, now, with high-frequency trading, accelerating, strong moves in any direction -- it could be worse than that."
So, Democrats and their media sympathizers now resort to a new talking point: Trump merely continued the economic growth that began under the Barack Obama administration.
Former Vice President Joe Biden, in a theme echoed by his Democratic rivals, said: "Donald Trump inherited a strong economy from Barack and me. Things were beginning to really move. And just like everything else he's inherited, he's in the midst of squandering it."
Are Biden and the Democrats right about the Obama economy?
To examine the Obama economy, one must compare apples to apples, similar economic conditions to similar economic conditions. Obama dealt with a severe economic downturn, as did President Ronald Reagan. Historically, the bigger the downturn, the bigger the economic bounce back. During the recession Obama faced, unemployment reached a high of 10%, while inflation and interest rates remained low. During the recession Reagan faced, unemployment reached 10.8%, prime interest rates rose to 20.5% and inflation hit 13.5%.
Obama raised taxes, spent nearly $1 trillion on a so-called stimulus plan, increased regulations and signed a new entitlement program known as "Obamacare." Reagan did the opposite. He decreased taxes and continued deregulation. Differences in results were stark. Obama's recovery, according to the Joint Economic Committee, averaged an inflation-adjusted GDP growth of 2.2% over the next 25 quarters. The average recovery following post-1960 economic slowdowns, which lasted more than 12 months, is 3.9%. Under President Ronald Reagan it was 4.8%. Obama was the first president ever to preside over an economic recovery in which not a single year of the economy grew at least 3%.
Obama's own economic team anticipated much higher growth. In February 2009, the Obama administration published its "Analytical Perspectives: Budget of the U. S. Government: Fiscal Year 2010." It said: "The Administration projects an economic recovery will begin in the second half of the year sparked by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. By the end of the year, real growth is expected to have reached 3-1/2 percent at an annual rate, a pace that is maintained through 2010. In 2011-2013, the rate of growth in real GDP is projected to accelerate to around 4-1/2 percent annually for several quarters."
The economy under Obama did not come close to meeting his team's projections. Trump boasts about "historic lows" in unemployment for blacks. But in January 2016, black liberal commentator Tavis Smiley admitted: "Sadly, and it pains me to say this, over the last decade, black folk in the era of Obama have lost ground in every major economic category. Not one, two or three, but every major economic category, black Americans have lost ground."
Again, the big economic downturns historically produce big economic upturns. The media insist on calling the economic conditions Obama dealt with the "Great Recession," even though by many metrics, Reagan faced a more serious "Great Recession." But, unlike the economy under Obama, Reagan oversaw what should be called The Great Recovery.
I’ve been waiting on this story to develop. It’s one of many accomplishments of President Trump, but the one that’s going to destroy them in November.
I don’t care if Bloomberg and Soros each spend a $billion, they can never that ownership of this thriving economy.
Out of one side of their mouths, they’ll take the credit for it, and out of the other side, they’ll talk it down in hopes it’ll crash.
Luckily Obama is gone and like Carter will be mostly forgotten in ten years.
The BIG Lie.
To quote Hussein “You did not build that”
Trump also lowered taxes and decreased regulations
y’all didnt build that
SO OBUMMER DIDN’T BUILD JACK!!
It’s gotten to the point now where I don’t even care to be in the same room with them.
“Dems’ New Talking Point on the Trump Economy: Obama Built It”
But they are also saying that this economy “isnt that great” and “isnt working for everyday people”.
I’m sure they also cant tell us precisely what Obama did to make an economy come to life ONLY AFTER HE LEFT OFFICE.
Reminds of the line from the Anchorman movie — “60% of the time, it works every time.”
They printed masses amounts of paper money. It’s a good way to devalue the dollar.
“The new normal” was the cry of the Obama administration. “Where’s the magic wand?” Remember that one?
Heh, heh. Yep.
Obama deserves some credit. Without him Donald Trump would not have been inspired to run and America would not have been saved.
The Dems are absolutely correct. The destructive effects of the Obama policies destroyed vast swaths of the US economy. They drove us into the abyss out of which , they assured us, we could not return.
The depths to which we sank under Obama are in stark contrast to the enormous growth policies of Trump. Without Obama’s failure, Trump’s success would not be as outstanding. Give credit where credit is due. Obama has made Trump look very, very good.
That clown couldn’t build a square using Legos.
I’ve had this same argument from relatives. I have a Ph.D. in economics and have taught graduate-level courses and have tried to explain Friedman’s concept of Realized Expectations to them to confirm that 3-year old economic policies, most of which were horrible, are NOT responsible for the growth we’re seeing today. I might as well be talking to a fence post. In one argument, I even got this response: “That might be, but I don’t believe it!” whereupon they spin on their heels and stomp out of the room.
The GOP needs to fend off this argument NOW! The general voting public is not smart enough to ferret out the truth here, and point out that, if the Federal gov’t announced a new 10% tax cut to individuals and businesses that takes effect 6 months from now, both groups would start altering their spending and investment plans today, not 6 months from now. The Obama policies are so far in the rear view mirror that they have little, if any, effect today...thank God!
This economy is definitely not Obama’s recovery (2018)
https://nypost.com/2018/09/12/this-economy-definitely-is-not-obamas-recovery/
Everyone knows that America was built on the backs of slaves and that whites had nothing to do with the growth of America. As the economic decline for blacks during the Obama era was across all areas for blacks it only stands to reason the he should have brought back slavery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.