Skip to comments.Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Remarks at the National Sheriffs’ Association Winter Legislative and Technology Conference (re defeating "sanctuary city" protections given to illegals)
Posted on 02/10/2020 3:53:26 PM PST by ransomnote
Remarks as Prepared for Delivery
Thank you, Sheriff Hall, for that kind introduction. And thank you to the National Sheriffs’ Association for inviting me to your conference. We are grateful for the work that you all do every single day to keep our communities safe.
The highest priority of the Department of Justice — and I know it is your highest priority as well — is the safety of the American people. That is our charge, and we are fully committed to meeting it. The very first duty of government is to protect the safety of its citizens.
At the top of our list is continuing – indeed, escalating – our efforts to combat violent crime. As you all know, the way we accomplish this is in a partnership, shoulder to shoulder with the nation’s sheriffs and other state and local law enforcement agencies.
Through our Joint Task Forces and such initiatives as our newly-inaugurated, nationwide Project Guardian – targeting violent gun offenders – we are continuing to reduce the level of violent crime. I am committed to pressing this joint work forward.
I also want you to know that this administration is doing everything we can to support local law enforcement. Just last month, we implemented President Trump’s Executive Order directing us to establish the Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. This is the first commission on law enforcement since President Lyndon Johnson’s Commission in 1965, and I think we can all agree that it is long overdue. The nature of crime and the challenges facing our heroic police officers have changed dramatically since the 1960s, and I look forward to our Commission studying those challenges and developing strategies to combat them.
These efforts are important because, as everyone in this room knows, few callings are more essential to the strength and prosperity of our nation than that of law enforcement. It is the rule of law that is fundamental to ensuring both freedom and security, and it is our more than 900,000 men and women on the beat who, every single day, uphold the rule of law. I have said it many times: there is no calling in America more noble than serving as a police officer.
At the same time, law enforcement faces more and greater challenges than ever before. Just last weekend, someone shot two New York police officers less than 12 hours apart in what appear to be premediated assassination attempts. These attacks are heinous. They are horrifying. And they come against a backdrop of cynicism and disrespect toward law enforcement that has propelled a cycle of violence and distrust between police officers and the communities they serve.
This is a very disturbing trend. Without trust between the public and the police, all of us will be less safe. It is therefore incumbent on everyone to work together to reverse this trend. We must all work tirelessly to ensure that the public has confidence in the police who protect them, and that our police officers understand how much we value their dedicated public service.
Nor are these the only challenges police officers face today. In addition to the changing nature of crime and the rise of anti-police sentiments in some communities, our officers must confront a wave of social problems, such as homelessness, drug addiction, and mental illness – problems that demand solutions beyond their authority and expertise. It puts tremendous strain on men and women in law enforcement when we ask them to do the work of social workers at the same time that they are charged with protecting the public from dangerous criminals.
Another aspect of the crime problem in this country, and one I will focus on this evening, is the challenge presented by criminal aliens. These are individuals who enter our country – frequently illegally – and then proceed to commit crimes. While there is no current data on the number of criminal aliens in our country — a deficit partly attributable to the local policies I will discuss this evening — the Obama Administration estimated in 2012 that there were nearly two million removable criminal aliens in the United States. Assuming that estimate was accurate, the numbers are likely even higher today despite the Trump Administration’s consistent and concerted efforts to find and deport this criminal population.
For many decades, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, the priority for immigration enforcement has been identifying these criminal aliens and deporting them from the country as soon as they are eligible for release by state and local authorities. Those efforts are a vital part of how we keep our country safe. Immigration enforcement is an essential part of law enforcement.
Unfortunately, in various jurisdictions, so-called "progressive" politicians are jeopardizing the public’s safety by putting the interests of criminal aliens before those of law-abiding citizens. They have put in place policies and laws designed to thwart the ability of federal officers to take custody of these criminals and thereby help them escape back into the community. They often proudly brand their jurisdictions as “sanctuaries,” and package their obstructive policies in idealistic and misleading rhetoric about “protecting the immigrant community.”
Under President Trump’s leadership, we have taken concrete steps to combat the dangerous and unlawful policies of so-called “sanctuary” jurisdictions. This evening, I will be announcing a set of additional actions that the Department of Justice is taking to protect the American people by ensuring the proper and lawful functioning of our nation’s federal immigration system.
Let us state the reality upfront and as clearly as possible: When we are talking about sanctuary cities, we are talking about policies that are designed to allow criminal aliens to escape. These policies are not about people who came to our country illegally but have otherwise been peaceful and productive members of society. Their express purpose is to shelter aliens whom local law enforcement has already arrested for other crimes. This is neither lawful nor sensible.
It is not lawful because the Constitution vests the federal government with the sole authority to make and enforce immigration law. For decades, Congress enacted immigration laws authorizing the removal of aliens in the United States who commit certain crimes. Those laws have been passed by members of both political parties and signed by presidents of both political parties. For example, in 1996, President Clinton signed into law a federal statute that prohibits restricting information sharing about aliens.
Despite this long bipartisan record, some state and local politicians have developed schemes to prevent DHS both from accessing critical information about criminal aliens and taking physical custody of criminal aliens. But that is not the proper role of local governments.
The Founding Fathers carefully divided responsibility and power between the federal government and the state governments. The “Supremacy Clause” in Article VI of the Constitution provides that the “Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof… shall be the supreme law of the land.”
This Clause is a vital part of our constitutional order. Enforcing a country’s immigration laws is an essential function of the national government. And no national government can enforce those laws properly if state and local governments are getting in the way. While federal law does not require that “sanctuary jurisdictions” actively assist with federal immigration enforcement, it does prohibit them from interfering with our enforcement efforts.
In addition to not being lawful, these policies are not sensible. Innocent people are routinely threatened and hurt by illegal aliens whom local jurisdictions have set free in the face of federal immigration detainers. Each of you, your colleagues, and other law-enforcement officials in the field are being put in harm’s way by these ideologically driven policies. And tragically, it is often the very immigrant communities that these policies are marketed as protecting who are disproportionately harmed — when criminal aliens are returned to the streets rather than removed from the country as federal law requires.
While there are many examples of the real-world damage these policies inflict, here are two stories that illustrate this terrible problem:
As everyone in this room knows, whenever a criminal is wrongly released, the lives of your officers are unnecessarily put in danger. Consider what happened in Athens-Clarke County, Georgia. There, an alien attempted to hit an officer with his car after he was released on bond and his detainer was not honored. And this individual’s original arrest was not for petty offenses. He had five outstanding warrants for a range of charges, including kidnapping and false imprisonment.
The reality is that sanctuary policies increase the already serious dangers facing police officers by putting criminals back on the streets rather than transferring those criminals to federal immigration authorities for deportation in compliance with federal law. These policies are textbook examples of misguided ideology triumphing over commonsense law enforcement. And it is the public and our police who pay the price.
Nor has this trend abated. To the contrary, politicians in sanctuary jurisdictions have become even more aggressive in their attempts to interfere with federal immigration law, going beyond their refusal to share information and facilitate jail transfers.
These efforts are unlawful. States may not regulate the presence of aliens in the United States in a way that obstructs Congress’s regulation of aliens. Congress has decided that aliens who have no lawful right to be here should be removed, subject to certain processes and hearings. That is particularly true for aliens who have committed crimes in the United States. State and local governments may not stand in the way of that vital federal mission.
To be clear, while states cannot interfere with federal law enforcement, they are certainly permitted to assist the federal government with the fulfillment of federal law. We strongly encourage local law enforcement officials like the people gathered here this evening to assist us and I know that many of the brave men and women in this room do just that — working side-by-side with DHS every single day, whether through a 287(g) partnership with DHS or otherwise.
But when state and local governments try to obstruct rather than assist federal law enforcement, we are not taking those efforts lying down. Under President Trump, the Department of Justice has challenged the dangerous policies of self-proclaimed sanctuary jurisdictions on a variety of fronts:
This evening, I am announcing further actions the Department of Justice will take to protect the American people and allow for the proper and lawful functioning of our nation’s federal immigration system:
Today is a significant escalation in the federal government’s efforts to confront the resistance of “sanctuary cities.” But by no means do the efforts outlined above signify the culmination of our fight to ensure the rule of law, to defend the Constitution, and to keep Americans safe. We will consider taking action against any jurisdiction that, or any politician who, unlawfully obstructs the federal enforcement of immigration law.
The year 2020 marks the 150th anniversary of the Department of Justice. Learn more about the history of our agency at www.Justice.gov/Celebrating150Years.
DHS could use the Paine Field in Everett.
What’s with all the Barr graffiti?
Thanks more good Barr news below:
Barr announces sweeping new sanctions, ‘significant escalation’ against left-wing sanctuary cities
AG Barr launches Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
Commission launched to address problems plaguing law enforcement; panel reaction and analysis.
Charging that so-called “sanctuary” cities that protect illegal immigrants are jeopardizing domestic security, Attorney General Bill Barr announced a slew of additional sanctions that he called a “significant escalation” against left-wing local and state governments that obstruct the “lawful functioning of our nation’s immigration system.”
Speaking at the National Sheriffs Association 2020 Winter Legislative and Technology Conference in Washington, D.C., Barr said the Justice Department would immediately file multiple lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions, and implement new national reviews of left-wing sanctuary governments and prosecutors.
“The department is filing a complaint against the State of New Jersey seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against its laws that forbid state and local law enforcement from sharing vital information about criminal aliens with DHS,” Barr said.
(Original: U.S. Armed Forces - We Must Fight - PresidentReagan (HD) 2015
This time the fight is against the global deep state.
This time the President's Army is in it, too.
(The World's Largest Work From Home Army.)
Think sanctuary cities are bad? Get a load of this:
H.R.5383 - New Way Forward Act
These are the 43 Corruptocrats that signed onto this bill,
which is even worse than sanctuary cities.
H.R.5383 - New Way Forward Act - Cosponsors
While he's there, AG Barr might tell those Sheriffs that they might
consider keeping an eye on these people that must be being
forced by organized crime, foreign interests, madness,
greed or hate to attempt the nations destruction like this.
Today is a significant escalation in the federal governments efforts to confront the resistance of sanctuary cities. But by no means do the efforts outlined above signify the culmination of our fight to ensure the rule of law, to defend the Constitution, and to keep Americans safe. We will consider taking action against any jurisdiction that, or any politician who, unlawfully obstructs the federal enforcement of immigration law.
Less speeches, more indictments, please!
We already know that you can write and deliver a nifty speech. Show us what we still don’t know about you.
These things take time!
Suddenly I’m hearing that “Waada, Waada, Waada noise that
Charlie Brown’s faceless teacher made whenever she spoke.
Any-whoo....How’s about that Oscar award show. Those actors are sumthin’ else!!
Brilliant strategy by Barr.
Two different (liberal) districts, similar themes. And a direct suit against states.
He sees an unobstructed shot to the USSC.
Supremacy will carry the day, easily and relatively quickly.
Federal law is clear on this issue as well, as is all precedent.
I am looking for a way out of this lib run state. We live on the Olympic Peninsula, 5 beautiful acres, that we don’t want to sell. We are presently shopping for a Diesel Pusher so we can easily travel and get the hell out of this failing state.
Big Time Bump
It is a shame no one in his cabinet has told him those guys are breaking several laws and they could just be arrested. Maybe Sessions is advising him.
B$ not one indictment just another stalling move.
Yep usually about the same amount as the statute of limitations takes to run out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.