Posted on 02/08/2020 1:41:09 PM PST by taildragger
Freepers
Grab the Popcorn for this 12 minute video.
Stunning performance by Steve Bannon, Maher is gobsmacked IMHO....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUOY8wY60W4&feature=youtu.be
I’ve been listening to War Room: Impeachment with Steve Bannon, Raheem Kassam & Jason Miller. They’re all good, but Bannon is one very sharp fella’. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed the program ... hope they keep going, supposedly it was only until impeachment was over. They do have a War Room: Pandemic site going where they’re posting news on the coronavirus.
Hmmm ... looks like it’s War Room: 2020 now (despite what is in the link) yay!!
https://warroom.org/category/war-room-impeachment/
Does anyone know if Bannon is still in contact with Trump?
And they seem dead set on proving that every chance they get.
Hate and their insatiable hunger for power is all they have to sustain themselves.
Quite Satanesque.
Maher filibustered him and wouldn’t let him finish a point. I’d like my twelve minutes back. The last Maher video I will click on. These people make me puke.
MENSCH??? You must NOT be JEWISH! He is FAR from a nice guy.
Just the usual Leftist BS from Maher. Its gonna be like Rwanda and Nazi Germany because Trump calls his political enemies “scum”!!!!!
Yeah. Good thing the Democrats have abided by the the Marquis de Queensbury rules Bill......
I despise Bill Maher, he is a totally dishonest person.
Schmendrick is another good Yiddish word, akin to nincompoop.
Or schlump.
My theory is that they simply went off the rails by believing their own campaign propaganda. 2016 was one of the nastiest campaigns ever. Not only was Trump called every name in the book - racist, xenophobe, sexist etc etc - it’s the only campaign I can recall where in one candidate actually went out of her way to insult the voters directly calling them a “basket of deplorables” (which, afaik, deplorable is an adjective not a noun) and “irredeemable”.
Who thought that insulting the voters was a winning strategy?
They did. And then they were shocked that they lost. But the thing is, they painted themselves into a logical corner. You can’t come back from calling someone a racist; it is probably the only unforgivable thing in America today. You can’t redeem someone who is irredeemable. So there is no reconciliation available, no path for them to come together. So they are lost in the upside down.
I wouldnt be surprised if Dems spent $3 billion on ads attacking Trump this year.
That’s a new one for me. I’ll try to remember it. Schlump.
Yes, I agree. This is imo what Bloomberg is doing in the race. We’ll see how he does after California and Super Tuesday, but I figure it is likely to come down to a brokered convention. It will be a mess, but his money will be perhaps the biggest factor.
And actually it was Steve Bannon who said a couple weeks ago, he may not actually be in this to buy the the nomination for himself, though it is possible he could once the Superdelegates get to vote. Rather he is in it to throw the nomination to a candidate he prefers - which is likely not going to be Sanders or Warren.
But at the same time he is building the infrastructure for a campaign. He has promised to pay his staff through November. He will have a well oiled machine, and plenty of cash to contribute to the parties (state and national) and the Democratic Congressional Committee and other PACs. He’s already spent more money than all the other candidates combined and has bought up so much airtime in advance that the other candidates who can’t commit to various media markets until they raise the funds will find there is no airtime left for them to buy. He could hand all that off to whomever is the eventual nominee and his cash will probably be a big factor in who that will be.
Candidates have to be sold equal amounts of airtime to any candidate who can pay for it. PACs can be squeezed out, but candidates cant.
Explain how that works. If Channel 1 has 20 commercial spots per hour available for sale, and Bloomberg buys all 480 spots every day for the next 30 days how exactly do they apportion it if other candidates show up with cash? Do they cancel the Bloomberg spots?
I understand they have to make them available to all candidates, but how can they sell what has already been sold? There are only so many spots available. Are they required to cancel the ads they already sold?
Stranger Things. :) Good reference.
It does seem like they've cut themselves adrift from the mainstream. They are now on a different path. Only time will tell if it's the path of redemption. If they continue with the AOC/Tlaib/Omar/Bernie wing; they are done. Maybe even to the point of a national uprising against them. It's getting hard to think of them as human anymore with their clear anti-American ideology. I've stuffed them into an enemy subhuman pocket for now.
How many Americans died during the World Wars to defeat their brand of ideology? Not going to let it happen in the USA after defeating it abroad.
Maher is so emotionally invested in a Hitler-esque parallel to Trump he misses the entire boat. He knows nothing was done incorrectly by Trump but puts his cheerleader shriek in play for anything they call out Obama, Clinton or the Agencies out on.
Steve Bannon is looking good :)
Interesting. Maybe we will look back on 2020 as the turning point for America and her future... HUGE money vs anti-deep state.
Cage match. Will billions buy final globalism?
Yep. We've got irreconcilable differences that will never heal or dissolve. It means that, at some point, there's going to be a showdown of some kind between the left and right.
The final split is going to be violent, or it'll be non-violent. We just can't know how it will play out, until we're on the very cusp of the thing.
Obviously, we all hope for the latter, but the history of the left indicates otherwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.