Posted on 02/07/2020 4:04:18 AM PST by WWG1WWA
An attorney has uncovered heavily redacted emails from the FBI, which indicated the agency has been providing false testimony on former DNC staffer Seth Rich who was murdered in 2016. One America's Caitlin Sinclair has more from New York.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZFEa1K1l8Y&feature=emb_logo
I would think the message sent to conservatives would be important.
Wray’s testimony on Wednesday just exacerbated the problem.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To expound on the point I was making above, if you haven’t seen Wray’s testimony, here’s an article link ... I’m posting the whole text below:
House Republicans Rebuke FBI Director Wray for Tepid Response to Damning IG Report
https://bongino.com/house-republicans-rebuke-fbi-director-wray-for-tepid-response-to-damning-ig-report/
House Republicans unleashed on FBI Director Christopher Wray about the bureau’s lackluster response to the damning problems uncovered in the DOJ Inspector General’s report on FISA abuses, according to the Washington Times.
At a House Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday, Wray claims he went “above and beyond” to provide accountability and made more than 40 changes to the bureau’s FISA policies and practices.
“The failures highlighted in that report are unacceptable — period,” he said. “They don’t reflect who the FBI is as an institution and they cannot be repeated.”
“I do not think anyone has carte blanche to bypass rules, and I intend to make it painfully clear that is unacceptable at the FBI today,” he continued.
Congressman Tom McClintock said to Wray, “You used the word ‘unacceptable.’ I would think you would find a stronger word for what has happened by the actions of people who sullied the reputations of every decent person at the FBI and disgraced the agency you now head.
He continued, “I’m terribly disappointed you can’t summon the outrage to put it in stronger words than ‘this is unacceptable and doesn’t represent the FBI,” he said. “Unfortunately at the moment, it does represent the FBI or at least the leadership of the FBI. You were appointed to clean things up.”
Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan (R) ripped Wray for his response letter to the IG report where the Director simply called its findings and recommendations “constructive criticism.”
“I appreciate your comments about Mr. Horowitz’s report saying it was unacceptable, but I’m concerned because it didn’t seem to me that you had quite the same outrage in your response letter to Inspector General Horowitz,” said Jordan.
He continued, “And when all that’s pointed out to you in a 400-page report, you say, ‘Thanks for the constructive criticism. A 400-page report that said there were 51 assertions that the top people at the FBI made to the court that weren’t backed up, that weren’t supported at all, and it’s called ‘constructive criticism’?”
“I’m concerned you’re not taking this seriously enough,” Jordan said. “Are you taking it serious enough, Director Wray?”
The IG report was released on Dec. 9 and identified 17 “significant inaccuracies or omissions” in applications for FISA warrants for former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Those inaccuracies resulted in “applications that made it appear that the information supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case.”
I emailed Sean:
RE; “Good FBI”
Sean, the fish rots from the head. Left long enough the entire fish is rotten.
Apparently he thinks differently or is scared of the FBI.
I would direct you to my tagline, good sir or madam. Videos, generally, 99% SUCK. They're inevitably poorly edited, contain 30 seconds of worthless introductory footage and 10 seconds of actual content, which is usually blurry, from a poor angle, and don't really contain the contents they purport to contain.
Sorry. The leadership could not get away with what it does without a corrupt rank and file.
I wouldn't trust any FBI liar any further than I could throw them.
The real clue to the fact that the organization is completely corrupt is the fact that they won't allow recording devices during their 'interviews', because it would document their malfeasance.
Yet local LE wraps it up in three minutes....I read the DCP Detective was Wasserman-Schultz brother.
9 of the 12 people who saw what was/is on Weiner’s laptop are now dead, including NYPD.
Or so I’ve read in various articles.
Fire up DuckDuckGo or StartPage and search “attending physician, Seth Rich, Washington DC, and maybe add “Kim Dotcom.”
Follow those links and you will see there are questions and non-satisfying half-baked answers.
Where is the physical evidence of a struggle?
At what range were the bullets fired?
Where did the bullets hit?
How many were fired vs how many hit Seth?
I did not remember that. Thank you for adding it to the thinnest of high profile *random violence* cases.
Nothing about this case adds up.
Where are the forensics?
A criminal act is a matter of *public record*. It is a crime against the people. Seth’s parents do not own it.
It all adds up when you realize Seth was the guy who gave the DNC emails to Asante. Like Podesta said, “...punish severely”.
I’m like you 100%. Beck’s latest “Ukraine: The Final Piece” is worth the 90 minutes. You can shave 7 to ten off the front and another 7 at the end.
If there is one thing that is consistent across grieving parents, it is their need to understand the *why*.
Those who are devastated by having to bury a child—the one agony that no one should ever have to suffer, need and seek some sense of closure.
Others around them often try to stop them from obsessively reviewing police, accident reports, gory photos, whatever they can get. But, they *have* to do this if they are to find some semblance of peace.
Many times, after months or years of dark nights of the soul, the tortured parents conclude that the *why* will never truly be understood in earthly terms.
*This* is normal.
Seth’s parents behavior is way outside the range. Their anger is fine. Misdirection onto the President is not a problem; totally ok at their stage of grief.
But, to actively fight against a good faith effort to get the truth about how their son died—this is what is so concerning.
I’ve been over the kimdotcom stuff in detail, and I would chime in thus:
He was probably murdered, not as part of a robbery. Random or targeted, who knows. I had grown kids in DC for years, they never would have taken the walk he did, where and when he did, so random (hate whitey) shooting is possible.
Two hits in the liver? He bled out right on time, I’ve seen it before more than once. Absolutely no problem with the timeline, involvement of providers at WHC not necessary to explain the facts.
My big city trauma work was a long time ago, but anyone I ever worked with would GTFO any stranger or especially anybody who tried to intervene in about two seconds. That’s just not how things work.
More felony BS engaged in by our DOJ(sic) under OBAMA!!
So much harm done by the traitor’s administration. They infiltrated every branch of government, everyone associated with it. I knew it was there, but never imagined it could be this vast.
For your info
From Judicial Watch on Twitter
https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1228045357604577281
@JudicialWatch Sues FBI for Seth Rich Documents. There is significant public interest in the Seth Rich murder and the FBI’s game-playing on document production in this case is inexcusable.
bump to the top
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.