Skip to comments.
Tom Perez says in a tweet he has ordered a "recanvass".
Twitter ^
| February 6, 2020
Posted on 02/06/2020 9:38:21 AM PST by rdl6989
Tom Perez @TomPerez
Enough is enough. In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: iowacaucus2020; tomperez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
This should be fun.
1
posted on
02/06/2020 9:38:21 AM PST
by
rdl6989
To: rdl6989
Right now Bernie is leading Alfred E. Neuman in actual votes. There will be recounts until Bernie loses.
2
posted on
02/06/2020 9:39:28 AM PST
by
C19fan
To: rdl6989
Keep counting until Bernie gets -30,000 votes!!!!
3
posted on
02/06/2020 9:40:20 AM PST
by
VanDeKoik
To: rdl6989
If you want to catch rats....NEVER shine a light on them.
4
posted on
02/06/2020 9:40:23 AM PST
by
RckyRaCoCo
(Please Pray For My Brother Ken)
To: rdl6989
They have said that gathering the data wasn’t the problem. They said that transmitting the data was the problem.
How does recanvasing helping them transmit data?
Why are they trying to re-gather data?
This is so nakedly corrupt.
5
posted on
02/06/2020 9:40:54 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
New and improved! now with more canvassing!
6
posted on
02/06/2020 9:43:28 AM PST
by
proust
(Justice delayed is injustice.)
To: rdl6989
7
posted on
02/06/2020 9:43:29 AM PST
by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: rdl6989
The Dem Iowa Caucus didnt kill itself.
8
posted on
02/06/2020 9:43:29 AM PST
by
Flick Lives
(MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
To: rdl6989
He knows that there will never be near the turnout for a do-over that there was for the original.
70% if they're lucky.
Not to mention they've screwed the pooch by marginalizing most of the field.
9
posted on
02/06/2020 9:45:17 AM PST
by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: rdl6989
Imagine a USA without an electoral college. There would be hundreds of these disasters and the country would be in mayhem every election.
10
posted on
02/06/2020 9:45:37 AM PST
by
Kid Shelleen
(Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
To: rdl6989
11
posted on
02/06/2020 9:46:15 AM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: C19fan
“Right now Bernie is leading Alfred E. Neuman in actual votes. There will be recounts until Bernie loses.”
Exactly. The DNC cannot have that so they need to “recanvass”.
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha
To: G Larry
He knows that there will never be near the turnout for a do-over that there was for the original. It's not a do-over. It's basically a re-count.
13
posted on
02/06/2020 9:49:06 AM PST
by
Fido969
(In!)
We can enjoy this now, but remember it’s only a matter of time before the DNC finally gets its act together. Hoping POTUS advances his position rapidly.
14
posted on
02/06/2020 9:49:45 AM PST
by
proust
(Justice delayed is injustice.)
To: ifinnegan
Democrats make up stuff as they go along—recanv_ass means whatever they want it to mean—today.
Tomorrow it will mean something else.
If you don’t agree with their new definition—every day—then you are a bigoted Neanderthal!
15
posted on
02/06/2020 9:50:15 AM PST
by
cgbg
(The Democratic Party is morphing into the Donner Party)
To: Parley Baer
Maybe the count on “the curve”, like grading on “the curve”!
16
posted on
02/06/2020 9:51:03 AM PST
by
Reily
To: ifinnegan
Basically, it means “We’re having a do-over on the vote” — which, as far as I know, has always been illegal in this country. (I’m open to correction if I’m wrong about that.)
17
posted on
02/06/2020 9:52:19 AM PST
by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: Fido969
Too late!
The integrity is GONE!
They know which precincts to eliminate or lie about.
What is the chain of custody for the precinct results?
18
posted on
02/06/2020 9:53:57 AM PST
by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: ClearCase_guy
Why did they need an app to count such small numbers of votes...? 🤔
19
posted on
02/06/2020 9:54:02 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: NewJerseyJoe
Thanks. It’s just a caucus of a party, so I doubt it’s illegal.
20
posted on
02/06/2020 9:54:36 AM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson