Posted on 02/06/2020 7:19:59 AM PST by artichokegrower
Three federal judges heard arguments in Pasadena Wednesday about whether major oil and gas companies are financially responsible for the damages caused by climate change.
(Excerpt) Read more at kqed.org ...
I am in agreement with this lawsuit and believe to protect the citizens of San Francisco that all fossil fuel originated energy must be cutoff immediately from entering the city. This means no electricity, no natural gas, no gasoline and such. We must act to protect those poor San Franciscans.
Don’t they have to, above all, prove “climate change” even exists?
Is Chesea Boudin, the new radical DA for SF, part of, or pushing this legal travesty?
Our climates are controlled by the sun’s activities. Man does not control the climates on Earth. The sun controls any changes in our climates. Our politicians know this scientific fact. Our politicians have no problem telling lies for money.
there is no such a thing as a fossil fuel...
I would shut down those companies and let San Franciscans stew without power.
These lawsuits are nothing more than a way for governments to tax the citizenry or remove profits from companies.
Here’s an idea. Stop selling fossil fuels and power generated by it to California.
Anybody suing officials for the much more easy to prove charge of providing aid and refuge to criminals who then rob rape and murder Americans?
Yeah I am with you on that, let them descend back into time before energy was harnessed. Will they revert back to using whale oil? 8>)
Yes they should pull a power company trick and shut the gas off.
Danger, Might be a bad air day in californicate. We will stop selling gas for two weeks.
If the CA legislature really believes any of this climate change pseudo-science, easy - just ban the consumption of any fossil fuels.
Now.
No waiting.
Need to finish populating the 9th Circuit with saner minds.
Me too. “May all you ecological bass turds freeze to death in the dark.” (nully’s Dad ~ 1972)
Yep, just like they raped the tobacco industry years ago by saying the tobacco industry lied about the effects of cigarettes, as if no one knew that smoking was bad for your health. During the discovery and trial they claimed they needed the money to pay for the health care of smokers. Then they put the settlement into the general fund and paid for everything but the smokers’ healthcare.
They are coming after the smokeless tobacco companies now.
No money in that. And they would quickly find themselves hanging from lamp posts.
I’m not seeing the downside.
Goodbye to the Intermountain Power Project, which is in Utah.
Why sue for oil and gas companies are financially responsible for the damages caused by climate change when they should sue the consumer for causing climate change because they cause the companies to produce the product.
OH WAIT IT’S CALIFORNIA
“Don’t they have to, above all, prove “climate change” even exists?”
and even more importantly prove DAMAGES from same ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.