Posted on 02/05/2020 9:15:38 PM PST by davikkm
President Donald Trump released a devastating video criticizing Mitt Romney after the Utah senator voted to impeach him as president.
Slick, slippery, stealthy Mitt Romney had us fooled, the narrator of the anti-Romney video says over images of Mitt Romney in sunglasses.
The video reminded Trump supporters that Romney initially visited the president after he was elected, trying to win Trumps favor so he could be nominated Secretary of State.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1225203837226700800
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
With any luck the two of them can share a cell at Club Fed.
If they have one big enough to hold their egos.
No telling where Romney and the Mormon mafia made their money. Ukraine is just the tip of his iceberg.
What are the odds that the next time Romney comes up for re-election the RNC refuses to help finance his campaign?
I thought it was more like a couple of hundred...
Never had me fooled. Nor did he ever fool a lot of FReepers. (unfortunately he did fool way too many of them .)
Oh, I can imagine what he will say in his speech tomorrow.
Romney is dirty just like Biden but hides behind the Mormon church. He should be immediately kicked out of the GOP. No excuses. Force him to turn independent like Amash.
Everyone knew Trump was taking Romney for a ride at this dinner.
= = = = = = = = = = =
Was it mitt who complained about PDJT and the two scoops of ice cream?
Mean Mr President.
Bad as Comey crying because the President wanted him to commit to supporting him.
HOW DARE HE! expect a holdover to pledge allegiance to a BNG????
Speaker Pelosis Son Paid $180K annual by InfoUSA (No Experience necessary)12/29/2019, 7:03:41 PM · by Liz · 7 replies
theunionjournal.com ^ | December 29, 2019 | Carlos Christian
Shortly after Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, in 2007, Paul Pelosi Jr. was employed by InfoUSA at $180,000 a year as vice chairman for Strategic Planning. Paul Pelosi had a full-time day job as a mortgage mortgage officer for Countrywide Loans in California but didnt report to work http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3804232/posts
Top Romney Adviser Worked With Hunter Biden On Board Of Ukrainian Energy Company
Federalist ^ | September 26, 2019 | Erielle Davidson Posted on 10/4/2019, 8:14:46 PM by cocoapuff FederalistAccording to Burismas website, Joseph Cofer Black (Romney adviser) was appointed in February of 2017 and continues to serve on its board. The timelines would indicate that Black and Biden worked together at Burisma,
Thats all???
Dear Utah, Please primary this scumbag.
The left wing loves him now, but only until his next vote for another Kavanaugh to be on the bench. He votes with Trump 80% of the time. It’s not 100% but its better than the other GOP Senator from Utah.
I honestly cannot understand how he can say anything about his conscience. It isn’t about conscience but facts and the law. The POTUS can be impeached for specific reasons.
Abuse of power is an incredibly nebulous charge and is not one of the enumerated reasons to impeach a POTUS in and of itself. But even if it were, the specific facts and evidence just don’t lead to a guilty charge at all let alone an impeachment. It was Biden who bragged about blackmailing Ukraine to fire the prosecutor. Biden opened this door. Why wouldn’t the POTUS want to know more about that? He is entitled to know what his predecessors dealings were for many reasons related to his job as POTUS. He said “a lot of people are talking about this” - that video was public record, and embarrassing to both the US and Ukraine. Of course Trump had plenty of reasons to inquire about it, and mend fences too among many other reasons. Zelensky took it further and said that the US Ambassador was undermining his government - this is all part of the same conversation - Biden’s video, the Ambassador’s actions, a new government in Ukraine, US-Ukraine relations... all part of the job of POTUS to make good decisions.
And so he asked Zelensky “if you can” (thus not a threat) let the DOJ know what you find out. This is perfectly appropriate. He did not say “tell me” he said refer it to the DOJ, since the DOJ would weigh the evidence of potential corruption, not the office of POTUS. And all the hard evidence supports the POTUS position that he was not demanding anything. Even if he could have gained a political advantage from it, so what? Every incumbent has a huge advantage over the challenger in that they have access to information and world leaders that the challenger does not have. Hillary had some 25 years worth of networking as First Lady (and chief adviser to Clinton), Senator, and Secretary of State and used all of it including allies in the Intel Community to try to dirty up her opponent.
Sondland told all the others in the loop via text message that POTUS wanted no quid pro quo. Sondland testified that POTUS told him he wanted no quid pro quo, only that Zelensky would live up to his campaign promise to crack down on corruption in Ukraine. That is basically the only hard evidence that exists; all the other evidence was opinion but ironically nearly all of those who testified said Ukraine was known for endemic corruption thereby underscoring Trump’s questions about Biden’s blackmail. Ukrainian officials say there was no pressure and they didn’t know anything about delay of aid, and in fact the aid was not delayed or withheld - it was delivered before the Congressionally mandated deadline. POTUS is entitled to review the situation before releasing aid for he is Constitutionally required by Article II Section 3 of the Constitution to see that the laws are faithfully executed. There was a new government in Ukraine sworn in after the aid was appropriated, and then a video of Biden claiming he blackmailed the old government. Trump had every right and responsibility to examine the situation before signing off on the release of funds. If POTUS thought for any reason that the aid was going to be used in a manner contrary to US policy or the law as intended (e.g. corruptly) he could appeal to Congress to rescind the aid. That is, technically speaking, the way the Constitution and the appropriations are structured. He is not just entitled to review the release of aid he is required to under the Constitution.
POTUS Trump did absolutely nothing illegal at all. I don’t know where Romney gets his conscience from but it makes no sense at all.
Why?
Because State is infested with socialists/communists. that’s why.
According to the British press back in 2012, Mitt Romney made the bulk of his fortune with the help of Robert Maxwell - the late father of Jeffrey Epstein's girlfriend and procurer Ghislaine Maxwell. It is apparent that Romney has "binders full of" skeletons in his closet, and good reason to fear President Trump. Things are getting quite interesting.
Ya he did.
He used “I” 59 times. Only a fraction of those were “I did this” or “I did that”, but those were sprinkled in too, mostly to trigger the Dems.
C’mon, get real. He said “I keep my promises.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.