Posted on 02/05/2020 7:41:20 PM PST by robowombat
Inside Pakistan Assembly, Islamic political party urges Prime Minister to declare jihad against India
FEB 5, 2020 4:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER
“Doing Jihad is mandatory in Islam. If a Muslim does not do Jihad, he is no longer a Muslim.”
He doesn’t mean picking up the kids from school, either.
“Pakistani ministers brazenly call for Jihad against India inside the Pakistan Assembly,” OpIndia, February 4, 2020:
Exhibiting its fervent anti-Indian or anti-Hindu narrative, Pakistan has once again called for ‘jihad’ against India on Monday.
Jamiat Ulema-e Islam, Fazlur (JUIF), a Deobandi trained party of Pakistan led by Maulana Fazal ur Rehman who is leading a crusade against Imran Khan government by organising protests across Pakistan, has now openly urged Pakistani PM Imran Khan to declare Jihad against India at the Pakistan Assembly yesterday.
Opining that mere announcement of war with India would force the international community to intervene and resolve the decades-old Kashmir issue between the two countries, Maulana Abdul Akbar Chitrali, a member of the Pakistan assembly even audaciously suggested a date, February 10 (Monday) for starting the Jihad against India.
Other leaders in the Pakistan Assembly asserted that war is the only option available in order to “liberate the people of Kashmir and to complete the unfinished plan of the subcontinent’s partition….
On 19 February 2019, Pakistani railways minister Sheikh Rasheed had threatened Indians and the Hindus with a nuclear war and had claimed that no bells would sound in Indian temples.
In fact, Rasheed had also opposed the release of Indian pilot Abhinandan Varthaman. He had appealed to every Muslim to join “Jihad”. “Doing Jihad is mandatory in Islam. If a Muslim does not do Jihad, he is no longer a Muslim,” he had said.
If we compare Israel and Pakistan, the Pakistanis got a large country, much bigger than Israel to live in. Like the Palestinians, there was no Pakistani folk and the country was not built on its traditional homeland. So there it is, and having its two state solution has not pacified the Muslims in Pakistan. Now they have nuclear weapons and are threatening nuclear war with India. So land for peace did not produce peace. Why would it work in Palestine or Israel? Probably the two state solution is seen by radicals as just a transition between a Palestine with no Muslim state to one with no Israel.
Can some Muslim apologist explain again how “Jihad” actually means inner struggle, not holy war? I don’t think Pakistan understood it.
“Doing Jihad is mandatory in Islam. If a Muslim does not do Jihad, he is no longer a Muslim.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Until everyone in the west acknowledges this truth we are all in danger from misguided notions that peace is possible with Islam.
Islam has always been a religion of war and conquest.
Mad Mo made it so.
Threatening a nuclear war with India. Don’t they know about the Russo-Indian mutual defense treaty.
After all, both Pakistan and India have nukes and there are many that suggest that WWIII could start with a nuclear war between them.
No similar threat exists with regard to the Middle East conflict.
The Paki’s would lose really badly in a nuclear war with India.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.