Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The most important Iowa result is in. Democrats should worry about the low turnout.
The Washington Post ^ | February 4, 2020 | Karen Tumulty

Posted on 02/04/2020 2:04:00 PM PST by Trump20162020

Even as the Iowa Democratic Party was trying to sort out the chaos in its reporting system, a party official announced that turnout was “on pace” with what they had seen in 2016.

In other words, it was mediocre. About 170,000 people participated in the 2016 Iowa Democratic caucuses, far short of the unprecedented 240,000 voters who turned out in 2008 and launched Barack Obama on his way to the White House. What was so exciting a dozen years ago was not only how many Iowans showed up, but who they were: young people, first-time caucusgoers, an ethnically diverse mix of voters in an overwhelmingly white state.

Until recent days, there had been plenty of buzz among Democrats that this year would set a new record. There was even some loose talk that turnout could reach 300,000, which would be incontrovertible evidence of the passion that their party is feeling about the prospect of defeating President Trump in November.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2020; caucus; iowa; iowacaucus; turnout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2020 2:04:00 PM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Meanwhile, the Republicans had record turnout despite the fact that Trump was running without any effective opposition.


2 posted on 02/04/2020 2:06:57 PM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

White privilege.


3 posted on 02/04/2020 2:07:04 PM PST by JusPasenThru (KAG 2020.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Low turnout, and still can't process the results.

4 posted on 02/04/2020 2:08:14 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Yeah, but it looks like 2% voter fraud in the Republican primary.


5 posted on 02/04/2020 2:08:22 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

“I wonder how many Trumpers registered as Dems to participate in this caucus. “

One of the comments. Nice to know operation Chaos is working lol


6 posted on 02/04/2020 2:08:29 PM PST by max americana (Fired ONE libtard at work at every election since 2008 because I enjoy them crying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Hey the results are coming in but I dont know how to post a thread.

Butt in first then Sanders then warren then biden...


7 posted on 02/04/2020 2:10:10 PM PST by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point finger at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Operation Chaos

Wasn't this some 2008 thing about voting Obama? That worked out real well...

8 posted on 02/04/2020 2:10:26 PM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

“...170,000 people participated in the 2016 Iowa Democratic caucuses, far short of the unprecedented 240,000 voters who turned out in 2008 …”

That’s an interesting stat. When we’re made to think Dem’s are ramped up in full Trump Derangement Syndrome Rage, they’re looking just kind of beat down and broken.

10/10 Will vote Trump again.

Side note - I have 6 millennial nephews, 4 can vote. They’re all pro-Trump. There is hope out there.


9 posted on 02/04/2020 2:10:53 PM PST by BBQToadRibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Wasn’t 2008 the year Obama Packed the Caucuses by hiring a fleet of buses to haul in Chicagoans??


10 posted on 02/04/2020 2:19:41 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

While psychology and sociology are totally fraudulent pseudosciences I do have to give honorable mention to anthropology. It is very “creative” for sure.


11 posted on 02/04/2020 2:20:00 PM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

What I’ve seen in the photos re “turnout” is

Alot of fugly young bois and gurlz


12 posted on 02/04/2020 2:20:56 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (Guns up . . . We cominÂ’ PS: Eric The Blower Ciaramella. PASS IT ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

More proof that Trump has nothing to worry about. The Dims can’t even get their own voters to turn out, let alone independents.


13 posted on 02/04/2020 2:21:52 PM PST by FormerFRLurker (Keep calm and vote your conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Be vigilant out there everyone. This is a very very bad week for Democrats, and every time things get bad for Democrats, there is a mass shooting. Just saying.


14 posted on 02/04/2020 2:22:50 PM PST by KobraKai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

[Meanwhile, the Republicans had record turnout despite the fact that Trump was running without any effective opposition.]


Not exactly. But it’s understandable. It’s not like Bill Weld was gonna become the nominee.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Iowa_Republican_caucuses
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Republican_caucuses


15 posted on 02/04/2020 2:22:51 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

How long does it take to count 170k votes. 10 guys in a cage wearing green eye shades could do it.


16 posted on 02/04/2020 2:23:33 PM PST by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020
Wasn't this some 2008 thing about voting Obama? That worked out real well...

No. It was voting for Mrs. Clinton to cause floor fights at the convention.
17 posted on 02/04/2020 2:29:14 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

I hate to go to WaPo site to give them traffic.

But NOWHERE in the article said anything about the turn out from yesterday. Only speculating about the number is going to be low.

Thanks for wasting my time, Karen Tumulty of WaPo.


18 posted on 02/04/2020 2:29:33 PM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = USSR; Journ0List + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Wrong thread idiot!


19 posted on 02/04/2020 2:30:04 PM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

That low?

Really?

What were the GOP numbers? I know a lot of people who went.


20 posted on 02/04/2020 2:30:51 PM PST by redgolum (If this culture today is civilization, I will be the barbarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson