Posted on 01/31/2020 9:03:09 AM PST by yoe
In case you were wondering why you didnt see former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondis argument against Joe and Hunter Biden on the three major networks, all you have to know is that ABC, CBS, and NBC did not air her remarks.
Bondi stood before the U.S. Senate and made the case against the actions of former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden over their dealings with Burisma Holdings in Ukraine, but only Americans watching cable TV were able to watch
Pam Bondi outlined how Hunter Biden sat on the Ukrainian gas companys board during his fathers term as vice president at the time he was supposed to be handling the U.S.- Ukrainian relations.
During Mondays arguments, White House attorneys divulged the bank statements that showed Hunter Biden having received $3 million over the course of a year and a half.
Bondi exposed the Bidens alleged corruption in Ukraine, but also brought up Hunter Bidens from the Bank of China after traveling aboard Air Force Two to China.
On what grounds did Justice Robert's make that decision? I was under the impression that the Chief Justice was impartial.......
Eric Ciaramella, everyone knows his name Justice Roberts....are you worried who might be caught up in Ciaramella's web?

Crime Inc.
I don’t like to make a lot of vanity posts but there’s something I’ve wanted to mention here.
Sometimes I watch the impeachment proceedings on c-span2.
C-span often has a liberal bias and often has a lot of liberals calling. Usually they will split the phone calls into pro Trump and against Trump.
In this case I’ve been shocked over several days that 9 out of 10 calls are strongly in favor of the president and in opposition to the impeachment.
Even from Democrat leaning States the calls are pro Trump and the callers talk about everything from the unfairness to the president, to wasting the taxpayers money and time on this impeachment, to the issue of the Biden’s corruption.
The Lame Street Media aka Democrats TASS network will hopefully all go bankrupt because of lack of viewership.
Amen !
Their licenses need to be pulled for refusing to air any opposing arguments. Per FCC regs they are supposed to give both sides equal time.
Just because the person happens to be the whistle blower does it mean they don’t exist in the world. The person works and the government and there is an unrelated report that he was plotting with someone else to take down the president. Obviously such information is important to the president’s defense. I really despise liberals and rinos like Roberts who act as though bringing out information against democrats is embarrassing and should not be said in public.
How can he refuse to state that person’s name in a question unless he has been informed the person is the whistle blower? My understanding is that he has no such official information. Therefore he should act like an intelligent judge and simply deal with other matters without revealing the whistle blower status.
I think many Americans, and even some liberals, know this farce is really a coup disguised as an impeachment. And more than a few realize the implications to our political system should something like this succeed.
This entire scam was widely recognized as being unconstitutional and a violation of due process. There was a lot there to make people both skeptical and nervous.
Its all backfiring on the Dems bigtime.
I think this could be considered campaign contributions to democrats. Its obvious to anyone the networks are telling only one side of the story in order to help democrat candidates.
Everyone knows the Democrat's motive for this big waste of time is pure malice.
This is SO SEXIST of the networks.
They are DISCRIMINATING against WOMEN.
Gonna be a hoot to watch these media ass hats when the dam breaks.
The media is the enemy of the American people.
Here is Pam’s presentation in total.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kqmojRRqB0
It is long, because it is through. It is the reason Hunter biden does not need to be called as a witness. Everything, Every question is already a matter of public record which she presents in extreme detail
Aside from the content, there is Pam. She is the future
“Just because the person happens to be the whistle blower...”
He’s not even a whistle blower. He doesn’t qualify under the law’s definition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.