Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi says Trump lawyers have 'disgraced' themselves, suggests disbarment
The Hill ^ | January 30, 2020 | Mike Lillis

Posted on 01/30/2020 10:18:59 AM PST by jazusamo

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday hammered the lawyers leading President Trump's impeachment defense, saying they've trampled on the Constitution while questioning how they've been allowed to keep their jobs.

"I don't know how they can retain their lawyer status, in the comments that they're making," Pelosi told reporters in the Capitol.

Pelosi was responding largely to comments made Wednesday evening by Alan Dershowitz, a celebrity lawyer on Trump's legal team, who asserted on the Senate floor that presidents cannot be impeached for actions designed to boost their reelections — if they believe that retaining a grip on the White House is in the best interest of the country. And "every public official I know," he added, considers that to be the case.

"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," Dershowitz said.

The exception, said Dershowitz, an opinion contributor to The Hill, would be cases where the conduct violated a specific law. The Democrats' two impeachment articles, charging Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, fall outside the federal criminal code.

"The articles of impeachment violate the Constitution," Trump's leading lawyers, Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone, said at the outset of the Senate trial. "They are defective in their entirety."

Democrats have vehemently rejected the White House arguments, saying impeachment is an inherently political — not judicial — response designed to protect the country from elected officials who violate the public trust, crime or none. Their impeachment case hinges on allegations that Trump violated that trust in withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine to press the country's leaders to find dirt on his political rivals.

Pelosi on Thursday accused Trump's Republican allies of trying "to dismantle the Constitution" in their defense of the president.

"Some of them are even lawyers," she said. "Imagine that you would say — ever, of any president, no matter who he or she is or whatever party — if the president thinks that his or her presidency ... is good for the country, then any action is justified — including encouraging a foreign government to have an impact on our elections.

"[That] is exactly what our Founders were opposed to — and they feared," she added. "I don't think they made the case. I think they disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about and what a president's behavior should be."

Pelosi's comments came several hours before the Senate launched the ninth day of the impeachment trial, featuring the second day when senators will be allowed to ask questions of Trump's defense team and the House Democrats' prosecuting the case.

A central battle throughout the Senate process has revolved around questions of whether new witnesses and material evidence, which has emerged since the House voted to impeach Trump last month, will be allowed to appear.

Democrats have argued for the new information, noting that every other Senate impeachment trial in the nation's history has featured witnesses. Republicans are virtually united in their opposition to that plan, saying it was the job of the House, not the Senate, to conduct the underlying investigation.

One witness, in particular, is a focus of the fight: John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, has offered to testify before the Senate under subpoena. And his forthcoming book includes first-hand allegations of the president telling him directly that he was withholding aid to Ukraine to secure politically tinged investigations into his Democratic rivals — a direct contradiction of Trump's defense.

The Senate is expected to vote on the question of whether to call witnesses on Friday. At least two Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Mitt Romney (Utah) — have indicated they're likely to support that strategy. Democrats, however, need four defectors to secure the new information.

A wildcard in that debate is John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court who's presiding over the Senate trial.

Pelosi on Thursday said a Senate vote to acquit Trump would be invalid without calling new witnesses.

"He will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial; and you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation," she said.

She also called on Roberts to step in and break a tie vote, in the event that three Republican senators vote for witnesses, creating a 50-50 tally. "I would think that they would have confidence in the chief justice of the United States," she said. "That's interesting to me that they're afraid of breaking a tie with the chief justice of the United States."

Pelosi declined to say if the House committees that have investigated Trump's pressure campaign in Ukraine — the issue that led to Trump's impeachment last month — would move to subpoena Bolton if the Senate does not.

"This is in the Senate now," she said. "We'll see what happens after that."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cipollone; dershowitz; fakeimpeachment; impeachment; nancypelosi; nutcase; nutjob; peach45; peachfotyfi; pelosi; presidenttrump; sekulow; senate; senatetrial; tds; trump; trumplegalteam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: Real Cynic No More
Why would Roberts be the one called to break a tie vote? Shouldn’t it be VP Pence?

The vice-president is left out of the impeachment process by design.

121 posted on 01/30/2020 1:42:43 PM PST by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

An acknowledgement that Trump’s defense team is decisively winning!


122 posted on 01/30/2020 2:04:51 PM PST by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Vile Botxian has a Bachelor of Arts in political science. My 10 year old grandson could earn the same degree and get straight A’s.

The Vile Botoxian is wiley and manipulative, like a trailer trash hooker, but she’s otherwise dumber than a bag of hammers. She also has dementia and is evil as h*ll.


123 posted on 01/30/2020 2:10:56 PM PST by RooRoobird20 (“The Democrats haven’t been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

cause she is?


124 posted on 01/30/2020 3:57:41 PM PST by Chode (Send bachelors and come heavily armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Seems like she's that crazy Red Queen yelling, "Off with their heads!"

Totally nuts.

125 posted on 01/30/2020 4:09:49 PM PST by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Well, if you don’t include the President.

;)


126 posted on 01/30/2020 4:18:51 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

i meant acting like the traitor she is


127 posted on 01/30/2020 4:31:16 PM PST by Chode (Send bachelors and come heavily armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
""[That] is exactly what our Founders were opposed to — and they feared," she added."

She knew them personally (/sarc).

Had she actually said disbarment I'd suspect she was thinking disBarrment, worried about her future in the clink.
128 posted on 01/30/2020 4:37:41 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Yeah - they really went nuts with Obama.

Still butt-hurt over Hillary.

Their evil knows no bounds.


129 posted on 01/30/2020 4:40:07 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Noted. Understood.


130 posted on 01/31/2020 5:52:46 PM PST by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and our forests)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson