[canuck_conservative]

The statute only protects whistleblowers from any employer revenge, it contains no restriction on naming the person

[pepsi_junkie]

The statute only protects whistleblowers from any employer revenge, it contains no restriction on naming the person

At this point you don't still think Roberts understands the law? Well let's stipulate that he understands it and just ask if anything thinks he actually cares about it? He twists and distorts it however he wishes to get it to mean what he wants it to mean to reach the objective he desires. So that means he can reject a Senator's question because .... reasons.

[timestax]

The statute only protects whistleblowers from any employer revenge, it contains no restriction on naming the person

That's right !!

[timestax]

The statute only protects whistleblowers from any employer revenge, it contains no restriction on naming the person

That's right !!

[Sacajaweau]

You're absolutely right.

I'd ask the day that the whistleblower went to Schitt's office.