mission statement, which states, ‘The newspaper shall tell ALL the truth so far as it
can learn it, concerning the important affairs of American and the world,’”
I’m sorry what she did was very low, does not this stupid woman realize Mrs. Bryant lost her husband and child? Does she not care about Mrs. Bryant at all? And the other children and families involved?
Liberal white women are becoming a real problem. This dame should have been fired, straight up, via text message. Send in a friend to collect your personal belongings, or else we’ll put them out at the curb for you.
I’m not sure the public is edified by drudging up Bryant’s past as soon as he passed away. I didn’t approve of the things he seemed to be involved in, but I’m only talking about a short period of mourning.
After that, have at it.
This person didn’t use good judgement.
You know folks, when I was employed, I NEVER would have bad mouthed my employer in public. I may have had disagreements, but it was their business to run, and they should have run it as they saw fit.
This woman has been reinstated. She should shut the hell up.
A business doesn’t need a reason for firing or suspending. Most folks have signed a separation agreement upon employment, and either party can quit at any time they like.
Joke?
The man and his 13 yr old daughter are dead.
No need to immediately bring up the negative.
But, that’s what F’ing liberal do.
That is surely *my* assumption.
The problem on the left is that they think somebody should be punished beyond their sentences. There may be room for discussion as to whether the sentences given for crime are adequate, but once somebody has faced justice, it is not anybody”s right to keep sentencing them for the rest of their life.
It is widely thought that Bryant settled the rape accusations against him for over $2.5 million. He was a heckuva ball player, no doubt about that. He had some questionable actions outside the sports arena. This should be remembered as he is lionized in death by many as if he had no faults.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-03-sp-bryant3-story.html
Archive link of the above in case the LA Times disappears it.
“You can’t say that! He’s a Negro!”
LOL!
NYTimes vs truth, what a contest.
I’m on team Felicia on this one. Go get ‘em, Tigress.
Lecture the boss, yeah, that’s they way to the top.
What a whiney bitch with bad grammar.
Bye, Felicia!
mission statement, which states, ‘The newspaper shall tell ALL the truth so far as it
can learn it, concerning the important affairs of American and the world,’”
“ Nobody wins in this one.“
The reporter was crude and insufferable, and the WaPo was shown to be more concerned with image than facts.
They both lose, but pretty much everyone else wins.
The media has hired a certain number of woke feminists who think domestic abuse is the worst thing in the world and make it their crusade to destroy anyone who has ever been convicted or even accused of violence against women. To them, Kobe Bryant forever is a low-life rapist just on the allegation alone. They are #metoo on steroids.
For that, it makes perfect sense to her to bring up a rape allegation within hours of the celebrity’s death. She wants to make sure the world hasn’t forgotten what one woman alleged to have happened (they eventually settled out of court).
I don’t doubt that when Trump passes, the Access Hollywood tape or the Stormy Daniels allegations will be mentioned by the third paragraph. I’m actually a bit pleased they aren’t limiting this practice to conservatives and Republicans.