Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans signal renewed confidence they'll avoid witness fight
The Hill ^ | 01 28 2020 | Jordain Carney

Posted on 01/28/2020 5:39:24 PM PST by yesthatjallen

Senate Republicans emerged from a closed-door caucus meeting on Tuesday voicing renewed confidence that they will bypass a nasty witness fight in the impeachment trial.

“The consensus is that we’ve heard enough and it’s time to go to a final judgement,” Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) told reporters.

Asked if the trial proceedings should go past Friday, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), another member of Senate GOP leadership, said it “shouldn’t.”

“We’re kind of confident,” Thune added.

The chamber is expected to vote Friday on whether to allow new witnesses or documents in President Trump's trial. If they skip witnesses, that will pave the way for a swift vote to acquit Trump.

Democrats will need four Republican votes in order to call for additional witnesses. Both sides would then make motions for specific individuals, and the Senate would vote on whether to call them.

Senate Republicans had voiced confidence last week that they would be able to finish the trial with no witnesses, a strategy Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has advocated both publicly and privately.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: impeachment; johnthune; witnesses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2020 5:39:24 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

So which is it?


2 posted on 01/28/2020 5:41:37 PM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’d bet 90% of the Dems don’t want witnesses. They know the outcome and what a waste of time witnesses would be.


3 posted on 01/28/2020 5:41:40 PM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

A different story than on the previous threads about this. Hopefully there will be less pearl-clutching on this one.


4 posted on 01/28/2020 5:42:20 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

maybe there were just horsetrading..or maybe someone read Romney the riot act over his own connections.


5 posted on 01/28/2020 5:43:20 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
From their lips to God's ears. May it be Amen and Amen 🙏
6 posted on 01/28/2020 5:43:58 PM PST by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

“I’d bet 90% of the Dems don’t want witnesses. They know the outcome and what a waste of time witnesses would be.”

guaranteed ... but everyone of the Dems will vote for witnesses while praying that the GOP has 51 votes, and they’ll attack the Republicans for voting against witnesses ...


7 posted on 01/28/2020 5:44:31 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

“I’d bet 90% of the Dems don’t want witnesses. They know the outcome and what a waste of time witnesses would be.”

guaranteed ... but everyone of the Dems will vote for witnesses while praying that the GOP has 51 votes, and they’ll attack the Republicans for voting against witnesses …

>><

BINGO!!


8 posted on 01/28/2020 5:45:52 PM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Both sides would then make motions for specific individuals, and the Senate would vote on whether to call them.

No deal! If there are enough RINOs to vote for witnesses, then there are enough RINOs to block all of Trump's witnesses while approving the Dems'. Unacceptable!

Should be one vote on one negotiated list of witnesses.

9 posted on 01/28/2020 5:47:35 PM PST by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I hope someone showed Romney an engraved invitation for his staff person to testify on Burisma.


10 posted on 01/28/2020 5:47:42 PM PST by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This thing is over.

Nancy can go to sleep now.


11 posted on 01/28/2020 5:47:54 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Welcome to the whipsaw express.

McConnell says one thing. Caucus participants say another.

Sounds like to much to hope for. Lets hope they’re right.


12 posted on 01/28/2020 5:53:00 PM PST by DoughtyOne (It's a New Year, and time to up our FR Monthlies by 5-10%. You'll <hardly miss it and it will help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

“I’d bet 90% of the Dems don’t want witnesses. They know the outcome and what a waste of time witnesses would be.”

guaranteed ... but everyone of the Dems will vote for witnesses while praying that the GOP has 51 votes, and they’ll attack the Republicans for voting against witnesses ...”

Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case. Sounds very Swampish.

If that IS the case than the Turtle’s “we don’t have the votes” is a ruse to get some dems to switch.


13 posted on 01/28/2020 5:54:15 PM PST by JPJones (More Tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: laplata

I agree.....They just want to say....It wasnn’t a real trial without witnesses....blah, blah, blah


14 posted on 01/28/2020 5:54:53 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Well, McConnell can’t come out now and say they are aligned for no witnesses. I think, in the end, they will align against witnesses, with Collins (and maybe Romney) the sole GOP votes against the caucus.


15 posted on 01/28/2020 5:55:37 PM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

disagree....Designated Dems will vote against witnesses if push comes to shove.


16 posted on 01/28/2020 5:56:35 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: laplata
I’d bet 90% of the Dems don’t want witnesses.

They also don't want witnesses so when Trump is cleared they can claim it was a cover-up.

17 posted on 01/28/2020 5:56:45 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I sure Romney got an ear full.
Only about 10 years too late.


18 posted on 01/28/2020 5:59:08 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“””””””””I agree.....They just want to say....It wasnn’t a real trial without witnesses....blah, blah, blah””””””

It doesn’t matter what happens. It doesn’t matter who testifies or what proof is brought forward.

When it is over the democrats/media will complain about every bit of it and make up whatever they want anyway.


19 posted on 01/28/2020 5:59:18 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

-“We’re kind of confident,” Thune added.-

huh?


20 posted on 01/28/2020 6:01:07 PM PST by bricklayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson