Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein leans toward acquitting Trump as his lawyers end their impeachment defense arguments
LA LA Times ^ | By Molly O’Toole, Jennifer Haberkorn, Eli Stokols Jan. 28, 2020 12:13 PM

Posted on 01/28/2020 2:22:46 PM PST by Red Badger

Just after President Trump’s defense lawyers ended arguments in their Senate trial Tuesday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California became the first Democrat to suggest that she could vote to acquit him, despite serious concerns about his character.

“Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge,” Feinstein said Tuesday, after the president’s team finished a three-day presentation in his defense. “That was my view and it still is my view.”

Still, she indicated that arguments in the trial about Trump’s character and fitness for office had left her undecided. “What changed my opinion as this went on,” she said, is a realization that “impeachment isn’t about one offense. It’s really about the character and ability and physical and mental fitness of the individual to serve the people, not themselves.”

Asked whether she would ultimately vote to acquit, she demurred, saying, “We’re not finished.”

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: dp0622
That’s a real word!

Which word? You got me wondering now!

61 posted on 01/28/2020 3:44:54 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
She still thinks she should vote to remove if she doesn't approve of things like ones character or physical fitness?

The issue was revisited at the time of the Clinton impeachment, when those who sought to remove the President from office, basing their arguments principally on the English experience and The Federalist No. 64, claimed that a President could be removed for any misconduct that indicated that he did not possess the requisite honor, integrity, and character be trusted to carry out his functions in a manner free from corruption.

She's maybe been reading or having someone read to her bits of the Federalist Papers.

Probably for better in this case, our case, as it prevents Schiff and Nadler from simply voting on the basis of hate.

62 posted on 01/28/2020 3:58:15 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

I forgot!!


63 posted on 01/28/2020 4:00:27 PM PST by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point do you at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The idea of Pile of Shift being the next California Senator is gaining steam - even Meghan McCain said today that Shiftless is running for Senate.


64 posted on 01/28/2020 5:14:46 PM PST by EC Washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EC Washington

The U.S. Senate consists of some of the nastiest narcissistic psychotics in the entire country. Schitt would fit right in.


65 posted on 01/28/2020 5:21:05 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast (It's the corruption, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson