Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2 posted on
01/27/2020 1:51:10 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(It's a New Year, and time to up our FR Monthlies by 5-10%. You'll <hardly miss it and it will help.)
To: SeekAndFind
Certainly a step in the right direction...
3 posted on
01/27/2020 1:52:23 PM PST by
EinNYC
To: SeekAndFind
Promises made..promises kept.. GET OUT FREELOADERS
4 posted on
01/27/2020 1:54:01 PM PST by
AmericanCheeseFood
(Fox Shadowbans People On Comments)
To: SeekAndFind
By letting the Illinois injunction stay in effect, the Supreme Court is essentially providing the Left a venue for the mass importation of new Demonrat voters.
5 posted on
01/27/2020 1:54:01 PM PST by
backwoods-engineer
(Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
To: SeekAndFind
Roberts holding firm... For now...
6 posted on
01/27/2020 1:55:19 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
To: SeekAndFind
So Northern Illinois has to keep admitting welfare cases? OK...
8 posted on
01/27/2020 1:58:26 PM PST by
Eleutheria5
("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
To: SeekAndFind
Welfare didn't exist when my ancestors immigrated to America. The argument by the left is always “we are all descendants of immigrants.” There were no freebies for my ancestors waiting for them when they arrived. Just the hope and promise of America so their motives were clearer.
9 posted on
01/27/2020 1:58:42 PM PST by
dhs12345
To: SeekAndFind
11 posted on
01/27/2020 2:03:59 PM PST by
JPJones
(More Tariffs, less income tax.)
To: SeekAndFind
Good. It’s how immigration used to be.
My parents sponsored a German couple in 1957. We were financially responsible for them.
12 posted on
01/27/2020 2:07:29 PM PST by
Pelham
(RIP California, killed by massive immigration)
To: SeekAndFind
Roberts could stop this injunction crap tomorrow if he wanted to.
L
13 posted on
01/27/2020 2:10:11 PM PST by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: SeekAndFind
Why aren’t all these nationwide injunctions handled this way? It’s ridiculous for one lousy judge to determine what happens outside his district.
14 posted on
01/27/2020 2:14:08 PM PST by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: SeekAndFind
Nice to have 2 trump scotus justices
15 posted on
01/27/2020 2:18:02 PM PST by
pangaea6
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
The Supremes put the smack-down on Corpseburg's 2nd Circus Court of Schlemiels:
- "judge" Amalya L. Kearse (Peanut Boy Carter)
- Guido Calabresi (Rapin Bill Clinton)
- Susan L. Carney ("Æthelblack the Unready" Obama)
These three clowns were upholding a nation-wide injunction by a Rapin Bill "judge" for SDNY - George Daniels.
They all emerge from the Supremes woodshed with blistered arses.
20 posted on
01/27/2020 2:34:13 PM PST by
kiryandil
(Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
To: SeekAndFind
Looking like Federal Judge can only speak for the State in which he rules.
I believe Barr spoke about Federal judges ruling for the entire USA is not right.
To: SeekAndFind
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan said in the opinion (pdf) they would have prevented the rule from taking effect.But you're in the minority, hahahaha! Crying into the wind!
28 posted on
01/27/2020 2:53:56 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: SeekAndFind
Glad to see that finally a Justice is addressing the issue of lower courts issuing nationwide injunctions. As he said, these are protecting people who are not parties to the case, and negatively affecting others or the entire country. These judges are out of control, and this is the first sign that the supreme court is going to rain these people in. Thank God for Justice Gorsuch.
31 posted on
01/27/2020 3:07:49 PM PST by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
This is a YUGE win for President Trump, our country, AND the rule of law ...
36 posted on
01/27/2020 4:10:29 PM PST by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: SeekAndFind
I didn’t even need to read the article to know which 4 voted against. It is vital that Trump win in November so that he can replace at least one or two of the Gang of Four with strict constructionists. 4 Leftist ideologues on the Supreme Court is frightening. We really need to whittle that down to secure our rights.
38 posted on
01/27/2020 4:26:30 PM PST by
FLT-bird
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson