Will America's Ships Survive the Year of the Rat?

2020 is the 100th anniversary of an important U.S. law that becomes more vital each year: the Jones Act. As the United States fends off China's effort to become the world's dominant economic and military power, this law has become especially important. Yet despite the law’s significance, some Americans want to repeal it, effectively allowing China to expand their ocean dominance by moving into America's domestic waters.

Last year the world learned that China's economy has surpassed Japan's to become #2 in the world, second only to the U.S.A. A major part of China’s growth has been its heavily-subsidized industry of building and operating ocean-going ships. This is huge because 90% of all global trade goes by 41,000 container ships.

But China is shut out of America’s market because of the Jones Act (part of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920). The Jones Act, in simplest terms, requires cargo between domestic ports to be carried on vessels that are American-built, American-flagged and owned, and American-crewed. Much of the world has similar restrictions governing their internal trade, known as cabotage laws, and counterpart laws that restrict foreign air carriers and trucks from engaging in America’s domestic trade and passenger travel have been on the books for many years.

Some American interests want to end the Jones Act in 2020, which under the Chinese zodiac calendar is the year of the rat. Motivated by possible cheaper fares offered (and subsidized) by foreign nations, they want to open our domestic waterways to foreign ships, owners and crews.

Free enterprise is not at stake. At the heart of foreign shipbuilding operations are massive subsidies. Many other countries have major shipbuilding subsidies (which the U.S. does not), but none as massive as China’s.

Since China announced its Belt and Road Initiative years ago, the country has invested mega-billions not only to control global cargo ships but global transportation itself. The government’s official plan subsidizes its state companies not only to build cargo ships but also to control port facilities all over the globe. This includes facilities on both ends of the Panama Canal, in Europe, in South America, in Africa, the Middle East, the Indian Ocean and of course the South China Sea—covering the major global shipping lanes.

A Harvard study found that in 2006 China designated shipbuilding a “strategic industry” and since then, “Chinese subsidies dramatically altered the geography of production and countries’ market shares.” This aid gives them an estimated 13-20% advantage in ship construction costs, which then is boosted further by lower wages and regulations. And once built, according to United States Maritime Administration (MARAD) officials, China pays an estimated $7-million per year per ship to reduce operating costs.

Where would foreign flags be flying without the Jones Act? As explained by MARAD officials:

Domestic waterborne transportation is . . . between ports, coastlines and almost all states and territories -- including Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. Each year, tens of thousands of vessels transport over a billion tons of cargo, with hundreds of ferry operators transporting millions of passengers, contributing billions to our nation's economy through freight and passenger revenue, taxes and private investment. . . . To ensure the survival of this key industry, Congress has passed legislation (the Jones Act) reserving this waterborne domestic trade to specific U.S. vessels.

Those clamoring to end the Jones Act ignore the national security aspects of inviting foreign powers to handle America's internal trade. A smaller U.S. maritime fleet, for example, is of less assistance to our military in times of emergency. Instead, asserting that only money is important, they promote the notion that foreign interests could handle our internal cargoes more cheaply.

That would be the ultimate example of being penny wise and pound foolish. Even the father of modern capitalism, Adam Smith, wrote in The Wealth of Nations that a country (in his case the United Kingdom) should protect its maritime trade from foreign competition.

Here's a preview of what would happen if our domestic shipping fleet began to resemble its international shipping counterpart. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics reports that now only 182 of over 41,000 ocean-going cargo ships are American (0.4%). The vast majority are built in the subsidized shipyards of China, South Korea and Japan. Currently under construction worldwide are another 2,995 ships (as tracked by the shipbrokers BRS Group). Only 8 of those commercial ships are under construction in America.

The Jones Act is not just about economics, it is about the national interest and security. Repealing the law would be an American surrender to nations that want a global maritime monopoly, and would put America’s 40,000 Jones Act vessels in economic peril. This would be bad any year, but especially now during the Year of the Rat.

Ex-POTUS, Barack Hussein Obama remains hidden in his fifteen million dollar, walled mansion...saying very little and that’s also a big ditto for his once big mouth wife, Michelle. He & she best remain that way....for it he and his wife that worked very hard to destroy the American Nation Republic.

They both are and were enemies of the state, enemies of all Americans, Blacks, Hispanics, Whites, etc, etc.!!! Obama is the low life that triggered the spying on fellow Americans. It is truly he and his wife that belong behind bars...we shall see, as time travels by!!!

This falls right in line with the treason committed by obama and hillary when they secretly engineered the takeover of Port Canaveral’s container ship operations to Saddam Hussien’s nuclear bomb scientist.

Why are they not on trial for High Treason for this?

https://theamericanreport.org/2016/09/22/obama-clinton-handed-port-canaveral-to-brother-of-saddam-husseins-n

The Jones Act is useless. Ocean shipping to ports which are both in the US or its possessions, is too limited and expensive. Who ships goods from NYC to LA by ship? It goes by truck. The only place where the Jones Act works is between the US and Puerto Rico, Hawaii and Guam. You want to ship stuff to those places you have 2 lines and double rates. National security is not a valid issue. We have a navy. The Jones Act is a make work project for the Merchant Marine Academy.

Flame away.

“But China is shut out of America’s market because of the Jones Act (part of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920). The Jones Act, in simplest terms, requires cargo between domestic ports to be carried on vessels that are American-built, American-flagged and owned, and American-crewed. “

If you want to ship some raw material from Alaska to California, you have to use over-regulated,, high taxed, unionized US ships. It’s far cheaper to ship it to China, process and then ship to California.

If you want to keep this nutty progressive era law, then cut taxes and regulations DRASTICALLY. Also institute a right to work policy. Then people will register ships here.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.