Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2020 8:46:45 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: nwrep

I would guess this has a lot to do with the high minimum wage in Portland which made business move and they need a new line of revenue. Their arrogance will be their downfall.


33 posted on 01/19/2020 9:29:33 AM PST by 4yearlurker (I dreamed that we were all together again,laughing around the table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

“Clean Energy Works conducted energy audits—and then, for a fee, referred homeowners to contractors for retrofits.”

so, with $30 million taxpayer funding, and say an average $400 cost (via homeadvisor.com) to perform an energy audit and make a contractor referral by a private company, that should cover 75,000 audits ... i wonder how many audits they ACTUALLY did for that $30 million dollars? ...


35 posted on 01/19/2020 9:31:00 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Oregone for Decades, has no sales tax.

So this is new and targets those who earn money and spend it in, Oregone for Decades!


36 posted on 01/19/2020 9:31:26 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Democrats sue Iran over the right to use "Death to America" as their 2020 campaign slogan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Morons on parade. When Walmart moves out and low income Porlanders can’t access reasonably priced goods I hope they show up out front of these idiots homes looking for answers.


37 posted on 01/19/2020 9:31:44 AM PST by Dave911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

We said that they just want another excuse to take money from producers and give it to indolent slobs who vote democrat.


40 posted on 01/19/2020 9:35:52 AM PST by I want the USA back (If free speech is taken away, dumb and silent we are led, like sheep to the slaughter: G Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Soak ‘em. It’ll just be passed on to the public who voted for it.


41 posted on 01/19/2020 9:35:57 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

“Unlike market-rate buildings, where landlords pass along utility costs to tenants and so have little motivation to weatherize, nonprofits that own subsidized housing have a big incentive to save money but often can’t afford to.”

right, because po’ folks who rent privately owned dwellings should be treated as second-class citizens who must pay for the sins of their landlords, whereas those who rent taxpayer-subsidized dwellings get even MORE taxpayer-subsidized freebees ...

“Both men say PCEF can thrive where the nonprofits they ran could not because the program won’t be measured by the strict financial metrics that utility-funded projects are measured by. Instead, PCEF projects can focus more on less easily measured health and climate benefits.”

in other words, PCEF will be freed up to squander their taxpayer money in whatever vague and nebulous fashion they see fit ...

CLEARLY, this utopian, taxpayer-funded, feel-good scheme is doomed from the very start to totally squander this lot of taxpayer money, while funding an entirely new bureaucracy of very highly paid managers and executives ...


45 posted on 01/19/2020 9:47:29 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep; All
”[…] and installing rooftop solar panels [??? emphasis added] at the homes of low-income Portlanders."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Question for Portland residents who have invested in solar panels. Given the rainy and overcast days in the Portland area, are solar panels worth the investment?

Hasn’t Oregon invested wisely in hydroelectric power?

46 posted on 01/19/2020 9:47:54 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Communists always create a crisis to take money from and control the population.
Thats it.
They only want to be masters over the masses. They hate individual freedom. They can’t stand the idea of self made people.
One MUST obey their groupthink. Any outliers are punished.
They ARE The Matrix.


47 posted on 01/19/2020 9:52:22 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Leave me alone, I have no incriminating evidence on the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Taxation is legal plunder.


48 posted on 01/19/2020 9:55:44 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
"The money is supposed to supply clean, efficient energy and jobs to people the city has long slighted."

In what way were "people of color" "slighted" by the Portland government? Are there any legal cases supporting that claim? Were people of color charged higher rates for electricity and garbage service? For water usage? Did police not respond when called? Were stop signs and traffic lights not installed in their neighborhoods? Did they have no sewer service?

Were people of color living in white-majority areas treated differently by the city? Where are the lawsuits proving that?
51 posted on 01/19/2020 10:19:57 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

She should return to working those street corners and back alleys...


52 posted on 01/19/2020 10:23:51 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Exactly what evidence is there that “people of color,” living in the same city as white people, “suffer” the worst effects of global warming, or that there ARE demonstrable negative effects from global warming in the Portland area, or that businesses like Walmart are the primary cause of it? The whole policy is based on unproven and unexamined presumptions.


53 posted on 01/19/2020 10:25:02 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
“The goal is ensuring the green economy benefits folks who are hurt first and worst by global warming”

So, does global warming somehow seek out people of color to harass them, regardless of where they live? If there's an apartment complex in Portland with 104 white tenants and 16 tenants who are people of color, do the people of color suffer "first and worst" from global warming? In what way?
54 posted on 01/19/2020 10:30:03 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

A Socialist slush fund. Congratulations Portland


56 posted on 01/19/2020 10:42:45 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Vote Democrat? Loser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
The Portland Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund, or PCEF, will raise as much as $60 million a year from a new tax on big retailers.

LOL! The funniest part: They think the "big retailers" will pay this tax!!

57 posted on 01/19/2020 10:44:35 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Vote Democrat? Loser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
The new tax, and the still-developing ideas for how to spend the money, signal a sea change in Portland politics.

Not really. Portland has been like this long enough for there to have been a television comedy about the sickly pretension of its "woke" inhabitants. What is interesting about this sentence is that while they do know who they want to plunder - evil capitalist corporations - what they're going to do with the swag is still undetermined. But I think I know. It will go where it always does - into the capacious pockets of the self-adoring social warriors. Look, for example, at the well-fed, self-righteous little gauleiter in the picture. That's where.

58 posted on 01/19/2020 10:49:17 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Maybe she could use the first couple of bucks to buy herself a hairbrush. Nappy headed ho.


59 posted on 01/19/2020 10:52:18 AM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

The goal is full blown Communism.

I regurgitate at the idea someone has failed these people.

Total B. S.

Who gives people this F’d in the head, power?


61 posted on 01/19/2020 11:18:11 AM PST by DoughtyOne (The Leftistist media and particularly CNN NEWS should come with a ten day supply of Cipro.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Didn’t Obama have the same intentions with the $787B “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009”?
“Invest in infrastructure, education, health, and renewable energy”
How’d that work out?


62 posted on 01/19/2020 11:22:26 AM PST by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson