Posted on 01/15/2020 3:57:39 AM PST by a little elbow grease
RUSSIA HOAX II: HERE WE GO AGAIN...
New York Times' NEW hoax starts like the Steele Dossier lie; nefarious speculation over a document of murky origins concocted by "experts."
The Times is playing the handmaiden to panicked actors in all out SAVE BIDEN mode.
Add in the threat of violence from many and you may see the stage set for a rejection of the 2020 election by the left
Failure retread! The definition of insanity is to try the same thing and hope for different result.
McConnell should delay the Senate trial for 4 weeks...lol.
The 'rats have never accepted 2016. You'd have to be a complete idiot to think they'll accept 2020.
Sadly I have to agree with you. Right now it appears the Deep State is prepared to hunker down, ride out four more years of Trump, and then go back to business as usual.
History will record that Donald Trump shot his presidency in both feet when he selected Jeff Sessions to be his AG.
Correct. There are the usual lies (Republicans hate women, etc) that everybody discounts. Then there are the lies llike "people will die because of Republicans repealing Obamacare". That lie inspired Hodgekinson to arm up and go kill Republicans. There are lies like Biden's about Americans who are pro heritage. Those inspire Antifa and lead to violence.
___________
I hear what you are saying, but I still cannot be certain just how successful (or not successful) the media and the left have been. Maybe their "result" has been successful.
I guess we'll see in November, that is if DEMOCRAT voter fraud doesn't take it away from us.
The Dems are desperate.
All these ‘impeachment’ hoaxes are about RUTH BADER GINSBERG, nothing more.
They figure she will not last thru the next term of office of whoever wins 2020, and they are scared to death that Trump will nominate her replacement, thus having a solid conservative majority on the SCOTUS for the first time in decades, and it will last for decades more........
________
Mary McCord ......
..... what an uptight freak. We used to have a crazy neighbor who looked like this. She used to chase her husband around their yard wielding a garden rake.
_________
.... yep.
____________
Ugh....... the left foot shot was just a flesh wound.
;-)
Like the claims from Crowdsrike and the DNC do we know it really happened as we're told it did, or the motives, or is this run-of-the-mill hacking and disinformation?
Russia hacked Ukrainian gas company at center of impeachment inquiry: report
Don’t get too far ahead of yourself. I strongly think we are taking a detour.
Thanks ; a little elbow grease;.
P
Great cartoon, but...a bit depressing, to be sure.
______
From the comments section:
trnathens says:
"My theory is that he wanted to get impeached, and knew that losing the House allows him to disclose EVERYTHING as a defense, in a trial, under oath, subject to perjury, knowing that the press will be covering it live, to the whole world.
Thats why Rudy is bullet-proof on any allegations of wrong-doing, because he was acting as a lawyer, representing a client (not the Office of the President, or as a government employee of the President, but the man himself, the defendant Donald J Trump, not PDJT), who is allowed to lawfully search for any exculpatory information, and can get their own subpoenas.
But he really wanted to wait and drag it out closer to the election. But this way will work, too."______
I'm no lawyer, but this is interesting.
Prof. Woland says:
"The problem with the Senate impeachment trial is that the average Democrat is brain dead and cannot be persuaded or convinced of the truth even if it walks up and bites them in the face. They are impervious to shame and facts. And the Lawfare scum is even worse. They know they are lying and dont care. They know that the cost of this thing blowing up in their faces is the loss of the moral high ground and 40 years in the wilderness like the Republicans after Watergate. So time to put the sword in their necks and send them all back to hell."
___
Yoi!
The Left branded McConnell, “Moscow Mitch”. Ridiculous
So, by adding “evidence” to the already passed articles of impeachment, doesn’t that mean that the House would have to vote on them again?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.