Posted on 01/03/2020 10:13:30 PM PST by bitt
Think about all of the media panel discussions on gun ownership you have watched; segments where second amendment advocates were ridiculed by media pundits for daring to bring up the possibility of the U.S. government using arms against U.S. citizens who hold opposing political views… There are hundreds of recent reference points.
Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.
At the same time as national Democrat political candidates are arguing to remove the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, the highest ranking Democrat in the United States; a person only two succession-steps away from the presidency; is arguing in DC federal court the House could begin an armed conflict against the Dept. of Justice.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
p
You mean, the Sgt. At Arms is going to march over to DOJ and kill everyone? Sure Nancy. Why not?
Wait, what?!?!?! Have they failed so miserably in the Coup they are resorting to armed conflict?
Nothing would surprise me when it comes to antics of their Dark Lord; the vile, demonic Botoxian.....NOTHING. They’re evil and totally insane.
My money is on the DoJ. I’m pretty sure they have more gunslingers than the House.
The House is overweight with bullslingers.
I pity her, she needs intervention. It’s so sad when granny just looses it to Dementia.
Nancy doesn’t really want to know what an armed conflict would look like. She’d lose - bigly.
Okay, I am calling my odds-maker in Vegas to check the point spreads on the upcoming betting lines....my money is on the DoJ....(total insanity, but it is fun!)
You’re supposed to label satire posts. /s
You’re supposed to label satire posts. /s
she may be demented, but she was moderately retarded long before any dementia set in.
Jim, where is the fun in that? LOL
If the legislative branch tried to field an unconsttitutional armed force, anyone materially or vocaly behind it should be instantly arrested, tried, put into isolation, and tjhe office filled with candidates who can make laws that abide by the Constitution as intended.They do not have and shuld not have executive powers beyond Roberts’ Rules of Order.
This is about the DOJ refusing to turn over secret grand jury information, a position supported by the courts. Nazi is outvoted by the other two branches of government, so her loony legal counsel says they might have to send over the Sergeant at Arms to seize this information by force.
That sounds like advocating the overthrow of the government to me.
Absolutely panicked over the corruption in Ukraine which her and her colleagues are involved in heavily!!! The actions of late by the Dems has been INSANE no other explanation than they have NO CONTROL over Trump, Barr, & Durham they are behaving like children not able to control the situation they are ALL involved in!!! This does NOT excuse our side either many on our side are also up to their eyeballs in this corruption and in CYA mode!!!
Even Kafka couldn’t have come up with a story as absurd as the situation Nanzi Peelousy, Adamn Schitt, Hhuck Scummer and Jerrold Nadless have wrought.
hopefully,Presindeng Trump lays it all out for the world to see during the SOTU address.
I went to the link and listened to the audio. When the judge asked the lawyer if the House had other remedies besides having the court rule, the lawyer responded.
Plain as day he said We can send the Sgt at Arms over and we can go have a gun battle...
He then repeated We can send the Sgt. At Arms over and maybe have a gun battle.
These people are insane in my opinion—TDS 24/7/365
Here is what the article states:
“Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.”
So the phrases used in the article are more hyperbolic than what was actually said. What WAS said was bad enough.
I don’t think the article was meant to be satire, but I would not call the article absolutely accurate. Of course LSM does worse all day long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.