Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/26/2019 10:13:34 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

I love Trump but I respect America’s Free Constitutional Republic more. I don’t cheer anything the feds do outside of their constitutional limits, Trump or no Trump.

Trump is a businessman “doer” and used to getting things done quickly and under budget.

But government isn’t business. Our Free Constitutional Republic in domestic matters was designed to run SLOWLY. SLOW government is GOOD government. The Nazis were quick. Fascism is quick. Totalitarianism is quick. The separation of powers, checks and balances, and the delegation by the Constitution of certain enumerated powers to the feds were all designed to LIMIT and SLOW government especially in domestic matter.

Unless Trump can show exactly what exactly he intends to do and the specific Constitutional power authorizing him to do it, he needs to stay the hell away, even as bad a CA is. Constitutionally, CA is basically up to the people of CA, NOT the feds.


2 posted on 12/26/2019 10:16:29 AM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good.

Now issue the SAME warning to the governor of Virginia if he persists in threatening the lives of Virginia Citizens whoa re exercising their Constitutional, Civil, and Basic Human RIGHT to keep and bear arms.

This is where the rubber meets the road. All roads lead to Virginia in 2020, Mr. President.


3 posted on 12/26/2019 10:16:55 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; ..

p


8 posted on 12/26/2019 10:25:39 AM PST by bitt (A FRIVOLOUS impeachment vote is a SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Is this Trump meddling in the 2024 election?


9 posted on 12/26/2019 10:25:50 AM PST by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

shoot...”homeless” are Democrat voters....over and over and over again

Newsom isn’t about to turn his state Red...which is what happens when homeless get jobs and a roof!!!


11 posted on 12/26/2019 10:28:30 AM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The way to deal with the homeless situation is for the federal government to file suit against states and cities for not enforcing environmental laws against the homeless.

Penalty is now something like $46,000 per violation per day.


16 posted on 12/26/2019 10:40:39 AM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Dependency has its rewards


19 posted on 12/26/2019 10:45:08 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

governor Newsome is party of Nancy Pelosi’s family (not just politically but personally too)

we can expect tons of lies,deceptions, slanders, and attempts to blame others for his own failures

it all runs in the family

(Newsome will NEVER help anyone find a safe home...never in a million years, Democraps only enable and promote more and more homelessness.....they consider it their voter base

IF PDJT can really help the millions of =street-people= find safe warm homes, WONDERFUL! Its not a federal responsibility but the crisis is so severe and the suffering so heartwrenching, I will gladly pay fed taxes and let the feds fix this horrible horrible suffering problem

however, can the feds actually fix it?
so far, almost everything the fed govt touches turns to more shit

and that’s the very last thing San FranShitco needs


24 posted on 12/26/2019 10:52:15 AM PST by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There are a number of homeless populations:
1. the substance-addicted
2. the lazy
3. the ones that want/need to hide from creditors and child support obligations
4. the independent-minded


25 posted on 12/26/2019 10:52:45 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kalifornia’s incompetence risks medieval disease outbreaks that could spread to other States. Typhus is back. Homeless people famously throw away their antibiotics and thus increase the risk of the spread of tuberculosis. I think one could argue that the Fed Govt could intervene if those fools, Newsome and his toadies, let things worsen. Though I think such intervention would have to include criminal malfeasance charges for those responsible.


26 posted on 12/26/2019 10:53:43 AM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

People who paid $600,000 for a condo won’t like other people getting condos for $225/month rent.

Certain places need to understood as the ultimate luxury goods:
Paris, London, Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, San Francisco, etc.

In the 1940’s, apartments in Beverly Hills were often cheaper than those in Los Angeles.

Prime real estate is one of those things, like Van Gogh and Rembrandt paintings, that are desirable and limited in supply.

Not everyone can have a genuine Van Gogh painting in their living room.

Not everyone can live in California, even if they are willing to work three jobs.

Mayor Pete’s South Bend awaits the hard-working.


27 posted on 12/26/2019 11:06:43 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Soon to be known as “Kimberly Guilfoyle’s Revenge.” :>)


31 posted on 12/26/2019 11:23:54 AM PST by Megiddox69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

In theory, even for the most ardent state-sovereignty-protecting Constitutionalist, there must be some point at which a state of emergency of any type, gets so bad, and so beyond the ability of the state to handle on its own, that everyone would agree the federal government needs to intervene, even take control, at least until that emergency no longer exists.

Therefore, a warning that the feds “will” intervene if the problem isn’t fixed, and continues to get worse, is, in fact, inevitable at some future point.

The issue is, then, when is such a warning appropriate.


44 posted on 12/26/2019 12:41:48 PM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Newsome rminds me of that character from Fast Times at Ridgemont High.


47 posted on 12/26/2019 1:17:18 PM PST by semaj (We are the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Donald, do not intervene!! Let them rot!!


48 posted on 12/26/2019 1:54:03 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Not fedgov’s jobto fixthe state’s problems.

If he can do it for zero dollars, fine, otherwise stay out.


49 posted on 12/26/2019 2:03:20 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Governor Gavin N has done a really bad job on taking care of the homeless population in California. If he can’t fix the problem, the Federal Govt. will get involved!

Empty threats accomplish nothing.

58 posted on 12/27/2019 4:00:04 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson