Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators predict deal will be reached for impeachment trial
The Washington Times ^ | Updated: 10:04 a.m. on Sunday, December 22, 2019 | Alex Swoyer

Posted on 12/22/2019 7:37:08 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

The President’s attorney - the Solicitor General - should present a Writ of Mandamus to the Senate Majority Leader NOW, which should be forwarded to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who would be the presiding judge.

That Writ should specify dismissal with prejudice of the case for failure to present and illegitimacy of the charges.

Prolonging this just gives Schumer and Pelosi a chance to try to blackmail McConnell into giving ground, when there is NO reason to give ANYTHING.


41 posted on 12/22/2019 8:29:58 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Mitch should tell Pelosi not to worry, the Senate “Trial” will be as “fair” as her Impeachment Hearings.


42 posted on 12/22/2019 8:31:28 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There is nothing to negotiate. Take it or leave Chucky.


43 posted on 12/22/2019 8:33:01 AM PST by 2dogjoe (Have a Blessed Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I do not think the democrats running for the presidency want it lasting months. They’d rather it be done now. If not they are literally handing the nomination to Biden.


44 posted on 12/22/2019 8:35:59 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Nope. Can’t do it, or House R managers will bring in all the Biteme witnesses and expose McTurd and Lindsey and even Yertle’s wife. I don’t see how they can allow any witnesses. If they allow one, they will have to allow all.


45 posted on 12/22/2019 8:41:53 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
Yeah, I don’t understand the House wanting the Senate to call witnesses that they themselves didn’t call. It makes no sense.

I believe it is because the House wanted to get the President impeached before Christmas and didn't want to spread it out for more months waiting for Mulvaney and Bolton to testify.

The House has passed it on to the Senate hoping the Senate can get Mulvaney , who has already put his foot in his mouth by saying that "there was a Quid Pro Quo just get over it"
. Also they think Bolton might get tripped up and add to their case. -Tom

46 posted on 12/22/2019 8:47:49 AM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wait just a minute. If this is so earth shattering, they all should be working on it 24/7 through the holidays. How dare they fly off on frivolous vacations instead of doing their sworn duty.


47 posted on 12/22/2019 8:47:51 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The United States Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
...................
The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
....................
House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House, Chapter 27. Impeachment, From the U.S. Government Publishing Office:
................
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-112/html/GPO-HPRACTICE-112-28.htm
...............
Sec. 5. Effect of Adjournment”: .....an impeachment proceeding does not expire with adjournment. An impeachment proceeding begun in the House in one Congress may be resumed in the next Congress.
..............
Sec. 8. Following the adoption of a resolution to impeach, the House appoints managers to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate.
.............
So, the “sole power” requires that the rules adopted by the House can only be changed by the House. Yes, the House could change its own rules and the Speaker could appoint themselves.
..............
Modifying that “sole power” to force changes on the House would require a constitutional amendment.


48 posted on 12/22/2019 8:48:33 AM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

WTF? No Deal!!!!!!
Why do democrats ALWAYS get everything they want??? After the way the house treated the republicans, why are they even speaking to them?


49 posted on 12/22/2019 8:53:20 AM PST by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Because the letter after the name means bugger all anymore.

A pol is either uniparty or he/she ain’t.


50 posted on 12/22/2019 8:55:41 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Klobuchar cant even vote as an impartial Senator, since she is running for POTUS vs Trump in 2020.

Ditto for Sanders, Warren, Bennett and Booker.


51 posted on 12/22/2019 9:00:05 AM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Congress critters always make deals and rarely do their jobs.


52 posted on 12/22/2019 9:01:57 AM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No agreements, no deals...republicans must dictate terms.


53 posted on 12/22/2019 9:06:18 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You dumb bastiges. You make a “deal” with the house they own you. So much for a bi-cameral congress. Here’s the deal, you march over the documents, we conduct the trial as we see fit. Take it or leave it.


54 posted on 12/22/2019 9:16:43 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

My guess is that they are postponing it to happen closer to the election. The senate can pass a resolution saying that they will not consider any impeachment resolution that is not given to them for more than two weeks after the house vote.


55 posted on 12/22/2019 9:17:56 AM PST by amnestynone (We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Once the House has spoken, **the speaker doesn’t get the decision as to whether or not she transmits that decision** to the Senate.

She must think she can pull another con job like she does with her sheep,it’s getting very dark for the left they triggered the trap door the stand on.


56 posted on 12/22/2019 9:18:12 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker
Dearest repubs: Grow a pair. No “deals”. Throw this sack of total bullshi* OUT! Don't you have enough proof over the decades that the DIMs/Leftists can't be trusted on ANYTHING? Haven't you realized that they are incorrigible malignancies on civil society? Wake up!
57 posted on 12/22/2019 9:22:53 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Actually, I think Jim may be right. That has been their MO on Kavanaugh, russia hoax, ukraine. They raise an issue with perjured or irrelevant testimony, the media repeats it as if it’s serious, they milk that until it is debunked and then, poof, another perjured witness talking about another earthshaking issue. That’s been their MO the entire Trump administration.

Ukraine is not going anywhere. If there’s a Senate trial, there will be another issue, more perjured testimony from new witnesses from yet another deep-state agency. And we will spin our wheels for six months debunking it while the Senate cannot confirm judges.


58 posted on 12/22/2019 9:24:04 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Well....Mitch McConnell did a fine job of not caving on the filling of the Antonin Scalia vacancy on the Supremes, when the Rats demanded that Obloviate be allowed to fill it. McConnell held it open until Trump was elected and filled it with Gorsuch. I believe he’ll hang tough; especially after his recent stemwinder speech.


59 posted on 12/22/2019 9:32:42 AM PST by Tucker39 ("It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Exactly. I just heard this morning about “new imformation” that may come forward.


60 posted on 12/22/2019 9:35:10 AM PST by 38special (For real, y'all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson