Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House considers arguing that Trump wasn't impeached
CBS ^

Posted on 12/20/2019 2:45:05 PM PST by bryan999

The White House is considering making the argument that President Trump has not officially been impeached, given that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not transmitted the articles of impeachment to the Senate, two sources involved in the president's impeachment defense told CBS News.

The House voted to impeach Mr. Trump on two articles of impeachment — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — on Wednesday. However, Pelosi told reporters on Thursday that the House would wait to deliver the articles until the Senate had laid out the rules for the trial.

"When we see the process that's set forth in the Senate, then we'll know the number of managers we'll have to move forward, and who we would choose," the California Democrat said. The House must vote on a resolution designating impeachment managers to prosecute the case against Mr. Trump in the Senate before delivering the articles.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: constitution; impeachment; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: bryan999

We all know the far left is crazy. They just show it every day. What a Circus. Clowns to the left of me Clowns to the right . . . Clowns everywhere.


21 posted on 12/20/2019 2:56:48 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

But all the White House has to do is say thery are considering it...and then sit back...


22 posted on 12/20/2019 2:56:50 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Why, indeed? Why didn’t the Democrats just pass a resolution of censure? What’s the difference? Geez.


23 posted on 12/20/2019 3:00:08 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

The House must vote on a resolution designating impeachment managers to prosecute the case against Mr. Trump in the Senate before delivering the articles.

I would be interested in just where they got this?

Maybe they shouldn’t have voted until they had
the managers.


24 posted on 12/20/2019 3:00:12 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PCPOET7

Not quite.

The House has up to the end of the next Congress to send impeachment to the Senate.
......
That’s two more years.
........
That’s enough time for the Dems to try to get control of the Senate.
........
That’s the hustle Polosi and Schiff are up to.
........
Trump is impeached by the House for now, but not by Congress.
........
If Reps regain control of the House, they can nullify the unforwarded impeachment.


25 posted on 12/20/2019 3:00:28 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

He should argue this, just because it will get under their skin.

The Senate should change the rules to say that only the Speaker of the House can be the “manager” and only the Speaker can present the case on the Senate floor during the trial. This could actually have the result of forcing her out of the Speakers chair, because the House Democrats likely won’t want her to be the one presenting the case.

Political payback is due.


26 posted on 12/20/2019 3:00:54 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

instead of arguing it, why not just state it unequivocally and tell the Dems to prove it’s not true?


27 posted on 12/20/2019 3:01:03 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
-- The Senate has the freedom to make up it's own rules about how impeachment is done --

Only over conducting the trial. The senate can't force the house to abide by house rules or axiomatic principles of procedure.

Meanshile everybody has 1st amendment right to say what they think, and Mitch and POTUS are taking good advantage of that.

28 posted on 12/20/2019 3:01:42 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Yup. An impeachment that isn’t forwarded can be revoked.


29 posted on 12/20/2019 3:02:35 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Anyone besides our domestic enemies at CBS reporting this?


30 posted on 12/20/2019 3:03:04 PM PST by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68

The managers only present the impeachment to the Senate.
There is no prosecution, this is a legislative not a judicial process.
.........


31 posted on 12/20/2019 3:03:14 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Nah, the Senate can change the rules too. They can say that they won’t hold any impeachment trials if it takes more than 10 days for the House to present the articles after a vote.

And like I said above, they could also dictate who must present the case during the trial. Pelosi wants to play games, McConnell can play too. Force her to present the case herself. See if the House keeps her in the Speaker’s chair.


32 posted on 12/20/2019 3:04:02 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Read the Constitution. It says that the Senate has to immediately take up the debate.


33 posted on 12/20/2019 3:06:33 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDOC-99sdoc33/html/CDOC-99sdoc33.htm

IV. Sequence of events at the beginning of a trial...................9
1. First a message(s) from the House of Representatives
is received containing the information that the House
has voted impeachment, adopted articles, and appointed
managers. The Senate then adopts an order informing the
House when it is ready to receive the managers to
present the articles of impeachment.................... 9


34 posted on 12/20/2019 3:07:33 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: philetus

I agree with you they should state it unequivocally. But ultimately it will still just be an argument. My personal opinion is, a POTUS is impeached once the House votes it. So personally I think he is impeached. But I see how others argue differently. Trump should state he isn’t impeached just to put pressure on them, to annoy them. But at the end of the day Pelosi and others (esp the media) will mock him for saying it. So likely Trump is weighing the politics of this argument.

Still I say, McConnell should change the rules a bit just to take the spotlight away from Pelosi, and to even embarrass her or force her out of the Speaker’s chair. Change the rules to say the trial must start no later than 10 days after the House vote, and that only the Speaker of the House can present the case on the floor of the Senate.

Make her pay a price.


35 posted on 12/20/2019 3:08:34 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bryan999
I created a thread two days ago and was skewered by half the thread's commenters that TRUMP WAS AN IMPEACHED PRESIDENT!.

image

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3801950/posts

Now two days later, I'm lookin' to pee on the flapjacks of those that jabbered their keyboard lips at me wailing TRUMP IS IMPEACHED!.

But I'll settle on reposting this gem from Freeper Bon mots:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3802335/posts?page=29#2

36 posted on 12/20/2019 3:09:04 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Why didn’t the Democrats just pass a resolution of censure? What’s the difference? Geez.

Censure wouldn't appease the Democrat moonbat members OR Democrat moonbat base.

THEY believe that impeachment without conviction actually means something. Some of them ACTUALLY BELIEVE that Hillary is president now, and not a delusional drunk grandmother wandering in the woods.

This is more analogous Schrödinger's turtle than Schrödinger's cat. In both outcomes, the turtle lives.

37 posted on 12/20/2019 3:09:22 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Senate doesn’t have to accept anything sent by the House. Its a sovereign body.

There’s nothing senators loathe more than House members telling them how to run their chamber.

Its NONE of Pelosi’s f*ckin’ business how the Senate manages its affairs.


38 posted on 12/20/2019 3:12:14 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

I don’t believe what you have cited is the Constitution. You are citing the Senate rules, and it does not say “immediately” it says they have to “receive a message” and “appoint managers”.

Those rules can be changed on a simple majority vote.


39 posted on 12/20/2019 3:13:01 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I think you are mistaken. Impeachment comes from the House. Removal (conviction) comes from the Senate. Article II section IV of the Constitution uses the terms “impeachment” “removal” and “conviction”.


40 posted on 12/20/2019 3:15:18 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson