Posted on 12/19/2019 12:50:07 AM PST by 11th_VA
Edited on 12/19/2019 5:13:14 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
I agree with your entire post.
The dog was in effect a surrogate border patrol agent. The dog was in effect sacrificed to prevent death or wounding of a human.
Police routinely shoot peoples dogs.Should homeowners routinely fire back and kill police? Dont be stupid.
It’s a dog, a tool, not a police officer.
If you unleash an attack animal on me I will kill it.
But then I do not resist lawful arrest either. But i will not get on that train.
If they can impeach the best President in my lifetime on no lawful evidence, this government has gone Feral, if this is not corrected, that badge means nothing any more, it’s just a matter of time till the dogs are on us.
The rules just changed folks.
K9 AGENT
Canine interesting .. I had never thought of it that way.
Absolutely! A dog is not a person so may not operate as an agent of the state. It would be the same as granting arrest powers to a policeman’s service weapon.
Pretty sure those dogs are considered “Agents’ by the departments that use them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.