Posted on 12/11/2019 5:36:41 AM PST by Kaslin
House Democrats are stampeding to impeach President Donald Trump without evidence of any crime. On Tuesday, they announced two articles of impeachment based on a new, rigged definition of an impeachable offense. They claim Congress can impeach a president who "ignored and injured the interests of the Nation" even if he hasn't violated any law.
That's a dangerously vague standard. After all, who's to say what's in the national interest? Democrats and Republicans always disagree about that. That's why we have elections.
To back up their charges, House Dems issued a 300-page impeachment report, written by Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff. The report plays tricks to frame Trump and damage his reelectability while bending over backward to inoculate Joe Biden from accusations of foreign scandals. This isn't a fact-finding report. It's a Democratic campaign plan. Dems cannot undo 2016, but they're determined to rig 2020. Tellingly, it treats Joe Biden as if he's already got the nomination.
Lacking a crime, Schiff resorts to an abusive prosecutor's trick: obstruction of justice charges. The report shows Schiff's the one hiding evidence.
The impeachment focuses on Trump's July 25 call asking Ukraine's president for a favor: Help the U.S. investigate Ukrainian tampering with the 2016 election and Biden's role, as vice president, getting a prosecutor there fired while Hunter Biden was on the payroll of a company possibly under investigation.
Trump didn't say military aid depended on the investigations, but Democrats claim it did. Schiff's report comes up with zero evidence of that.
The Committee grilled 18 witnesses. Only one, Ambassador Gordon Sondland, had first-hand knowledge of whether Trump intended a quid pro quo for aid. Sondland said Trump was "crystal clear" that aid did not hinge on investigations. Schiff dismisses that as a "false exculpatory" on page 24.
Instead, Schiff inflates testimony from disgruntled diplomats and National Security aide Tim Morrison. They never talked to Trump, but heard rumors aid was delayed waiting for Ukraine to act. They "believed" or had an "understanding" of it. Slippery words, on page 134, that Schiff tries to pawn off as evidence.
Lacking proof, Schiff charges obstruction. He implies, on page 107, that Trump hid the transcript of the July 25 call on a highly classified server. Nonsense. Morrison and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman both testified the call record ended up there by mistake. And when asked, Trump released it.
Schiff also tries to nail Trump with obstruction for withholding documents and instructing White House officials not to testify, as page 217 claims. That's farcical.
Democrats are rushing to impeach, and Schiff refuses to "allow the White House to engage us in a lengthy game of rope-a-dope in the courts." But Trump's entitled to court review of what he has to release. The Constitution gives judges, not Schiff, final say. Trump's not guilty of obstruction unless he defies the courts.
It's Schiff who's thwarting justice by impeaching without key witnesses or documents.
Instead, Schiff's report makes exonerating Biden top priority. The 300-page report mentions the Bidens 239 times and is riddled with statements like this, on page 103: "Multiple witnesses ... testify that they were not aware of any credible evidence to support claims that former Vice President Biden acted inappropriately."
Schiff's report has an entire section titled "President Trump Promoted False Information About Former Vice President Joe Biden." All politicians badmouth rivals. What business is it of the Intelligence Committee?
Schiff insists allegations of wrongdoing by Biden "have been discredited," "lacked any basis in fact," "are without merit" and are a "false narrative."
The real false narrative is about the whistleblower. On page 143, Schiff's report disingenuously claims first hearing about the whistleblower on Sept. 9. He also claimed that in media interviews, until The New York Times caught him in the lie. Truth is, his staff guided the whistleblower to file a complaint.
Yet Schiff refuses to surrender documents on his involvement and sees no reason to testify in a Senate trial. Without the whistleblower, there would be no impeachment. Did Schiff orchestrate a phony scandal, once the Mueller investigation led nowhere? It's alarming to hear Senator Susan Collins, R-Maine, speculate that perhaps witnesses are not needed. And Senator Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., express reluctance to compel a House member to testify. The nation needs to know.
Trump's already gotten a raw deal in the House. He deserves fairness in the Senate.
Only if the definition of "The Nation" only includes them!
Public Serve Us on full display!
From this point forward, every President will be impeached if the opposition party holds the House.
Heckuva legacy, Nancy-pants!
Bttt
Treason.
No justice if Schiff doesn’t swing.
Dems having served as Representatives of the people for decades upon decades have proven they least interest is the people...until it’s election time to lie for their votes.
Dems having served as Representatives of the people for decades upon decades have proven they least interest is the people...until it’s election time to lie for their votes.
yep. ever since gore pulled his bullsh** in 2000, election results are contested in the courts.
this current crap will result in the trivialization of the impeachment process for all future presidents.
once again, the communists strive to destroy our institutions.
my loathing runs deep for these scum.
We have Democrap politicians sanctimoniously lecture us about “no one above the law” while their “sanctuary” cities ignore federal immigration laws, protect criminal aliens, and allow their city streets to be littered with drug needles, filth and homeless tents… all while crowing about how they “care about the environment.” In reality... have they not impeached themselves?
Do they think we don’t notice their brazen hypocrisy is exposed with every lying syllable their corrupt mouths utter?!
Yeah, but at some point soon it will become meaningless to the point of becoming ceremony. They can charge money for it and donate it to charity. Sort of like a political Dean Martin Roast.
"Two scoops? Have you looked in a mirror lately? Do they make mirrors that big? More like two dozen! You're impeached, Pal. Here's a coupon for Jenny Craig." ~ Don Rickles' ghost.
If the dems are rewarded at the ballot box than yes, any republican President will be impeached by any dem controlled congress. I think that other than Trump, the rest of the GOP still likes to fight like gentlemen, with strongly worded letters and statements about being deeply concerned. They will never impeach anyone for any reason.
But if the dems are savaged at the ballot box over this, they will not do it again. We must as a nation make it so.
To be fair, the House could impeach a president over his choice of breafast cereal.
It is up to the Senate and voters to render a verdict on the House’s wisdom or lack thereof.
We will win this.
An existential contradiction if ever there was one.
High crimes and misdemeanors, the constitution is very specific.
High crimes and misdemeanors, the constitution is very specific.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.