Stanford Law Professor Pamela Susan Karlan, who showed herself to be a colossal, sophomoric, bitter, self-impressed, narrow-minded jerk, is quoted in her Wikipedia article as saying she is the LGBT partner of a Stanford lecturer, Viola Canales, who writes in her Wiki article that she is the partner of Karlan and that she, Canales, "teaches courses that combine law and fiction writing." ! Can't make this stuff up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
2 posted on
12/05/2019 7:05:42 AM PST by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
"..."I want to apologize for what I said..."Not an apology, you pinheaded pissant political slut whore.
3 posted on
12/05/2019 7:05:52 AM PST by
budj
(combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
sorry toots karlan, that’s not an apology.
President Trump has nothing to apologize for. He did nothing wrong.
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Help me out here. Is that a real apology when she says the President should also apologize for all of his actions?
She seems like a rabid partisan b**** who cannot resist getting her partisan digs in, no matter what the subject being discussed is.
She could have been on the Supreme Court if Hillary had been elected ; think about that.
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
That is NOT an apology. That is the professor acknowledging that she was caught. The President has nothing to apologize for.
6 posted on
12/05/2019 7:08:09 AM PST by
madison10
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
I want to apologize for what I said earlier about the president's son. It was wrong of me to do that. I wish the president would apologize, obviously, for the things that he's done that's wrong... That's an apology? Another arrogant, self-important, person they dug up whose opinion is anti-Trump. Wouldn't it be refreshing to have someone testify based on the facts?
7 posted on
12/05/2019 7:08:19 AM PST by
econjack
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Perhaps Jessica Kwong can write (LOL) lie a nice article about the young man.
8 posted on
12/05/2019 7:08:41 AM PST by
PGalt
(Past Peak Civilization?)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
She is the perfect Broward county Democrat.
12 posted on
12/05/2019 7:12:50 AM PST by
rrrod
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
That’s not an apology. You can’t bash your apologee when you are the apologer and call it an apology.
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
She couldn’t do it without taking one more dig at Trump.
15 posted on
12/05/2019 7:16:11 AM PST by
Hugh the Scot
("Jesus was a fundamentalist".- BipolarBob)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
If that bitter, dumb, lesbian hag is their “star” they are really screwed.
16 posted on
12/05/2019 7:16:29 AM PST by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Sorry lady, but there is no quid pro quo in an apology... you are either sorry or you’re not.
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
I bet she regrets it. She got called out and looked like an idiot on national TV.
She’s not sorry, though.
21 posted on
12/05/2019 7:22:34 AM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(I trust President Trump.)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
I guess everybody is hypersensitive these days. I don’t find anything offensive in what that woman said.
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
A non-apology apology. They are good at that...................
26 posted on
12/05/2019 7:24:21 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain...................)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
It was a bad day for that “snarky, bisexual, Jewish wom[a]n” and the rest of the rats.
27 posted on
12/05/2019 7:25:49 AM PST by
maggief
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
I believe the exchange was scripted. Obviously the question was prepared, but it appears that the question was given to the Snarky Bi-Sexual Jewish woman in advance.
Watch the exchange again
28 posted on
12/05/2019 7:26:52 AM PST by
Michael.SF.
(Youth, speed and energy can always be overcome with experience and treachery.)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Another bullShiite, weak, pussified, liberal-style excuse for an “apology.”
30 posted on
12/05/2019 7:29:06 AM PST by
cld51860
(Volo pro veritas)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
She is Gender Fluid as well. Can’t imagine any man or woman wanting to share a bed with her.
32 posted on
12/05/2019 7:30:22 AM PST by
duckman
( Not tired of winning!)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
It’s a nasty person who can’t resist a snark even at inopportune times such as a hearing in which she is supposed to appear impartial.
33 posted on
12/05/2019 7:31:19 AM PST by
Sans-Culotte
(With every passing day, I am a little bit gladder that Romney lost in 2012.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson