Posted on 12/04/2019 9:41:30 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
On Wednesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said he would vote for impeachment because the Democrats “have credibly argued” that President Donald Trump has obstructed Congress.
Napolitano said, “I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses. The easiest one, because this existed in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton — is obstruction of Congress.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I don’t recall Obstruction of Congress being one of charge’s in Clinton’s impeachment
I am not going to mention that this man has an advancing hairline, to do so would be duplicitous and juvenile. Much like his baseless statement “I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses. The easiest one, because this existed in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton — is obstruction of Congress.” Exactly what impeachable offenses has President Trump committed? Napolitano and the Democrats shrink from any specificity, because the would be forced to back it up with more than just empty accusations and obvious emotional ranting. Sorry Judge, nothing here. There go the Judge! There go the Judge! There go the Judge!
To late. I quit watching all TV.
Fox needs to end this guy’s contract.
The Judge didn’t get a job in Trump Admin.
Thank God.
The guy must have quite the ego to think his weak resume stacks up against the others that were considered.
I’m not a pointy headed liberal but I believe all three branches of Government are equal. When there is a dispute between Congress and the President, then the Judiciary Branch will decide who is correct. Seems fairly simple to me.
Turley smarter than Nappy and he is dragging Dems all over the place right now.
I can’t think of a bad three letter word.
There was a time I liked this guy. Now I wish he would just shut up and go away!
I tape Laura...Might watch Lou Dobbs, and Tucker.
EVen with Laura, whenever she has one of the liberal left on there to debate, like eg with Bongino or with Candice Owens I turn her off.
Funny, how Tucker, Hannity, Dobbs, Laura... they NEVER... NEEEEVER ever have the midget judge on their shows. They know the guy is an idiot...
Good thing you aren’t in Congress you little goombah
Yes it’s simple — but let the courts determine who’s right.
Related:
> The guy must have quite the ego to think his weak resume stacks up against the others that were considered. <
Trump was probably just being polite. I suppose Napolitano hinted to him that he wanted a SC nomination. And then Trump said something back like “Yeah, maybe.”
And then petty little Napolitano heard what he wanted to hear.
Next tell us, if you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be?
I care just as little about the answer to that one. Lol
Shut up Nappy. You idiot. And if I were Khan you would swing freely from the tallest tree.
The bad word I applied to Judge Nap with regard to his chosen lifestyle in the UK refers to a cigarette in neutral terms.
This guy has been a Never Trumper since he was reprimanded by Fox a year or so ago. He has zero character if he can be bought out at his age.
It’s ok, I don’t watch Fox, and don’t know anyone who has agreed with him on anything.
Hey Nap, FUYAH.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.