Posted on 12/03/2019 7:24:45 AM PST by House Atreides
The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.
In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.
Professor Wæver says more resistance to change could potentially threaten democracy although the U.N. would counter that the end justified the means in much the same way countries like Greece had their debt crisis solutions forced on them by European Union bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg.
“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” he says.
“And then it’s within their competencies to decide ‘and you are doing this, you are doing this, you are doing this, this is how we deal with it’.”
He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses. See the full interview below:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Just imagine what they’d do if they succeeded in one world government.
Yep, start with the biggest polluter, go for China frist for certain.
Well, the UN would not be able to use airplanes or gasoline powered tanks (Green New Deal donchano), so that would be interesting.
Going to war, with all the carbon footprint of a war, to reduce the global carbon footprint is beyond Lewis Carrol or even P K Dick.
Indeed. . .I fart in their general direction and their mother was a hamster and their father smelt of elderberrys.
Yea, three men, wearing skirts and armed with stuffed unicorns will show up and cry! But, they will be accompanied by that powerful little girl who knows everything and has power over all things climate!
Need any more proof that climate change is a stalking horse for Global Government?
Jar-Jar Binks: “I vote we give to the chancellor supreme powers to create an army”
The globalists are making their move.
Lol
What Ole ACTUALLY looks like:
No I’m from New York City and still remember that day and would gladly trade off..
I wouldn’t have even lost sleep though it wouldn’t be fair that hundreds of prostitutes got killed too
This shows what the “real” agenda is behind the climate change fraud.
The goal for the U.N. is to immanentize the eschaton
Ah, academics. They hate the military, until they realize that people would only comply with their hare-brained schemes under threat of military force.
I read the article earlier and did not think this man favored the idea. He seemed to think it would lead to global war and not in anyone’s best interests. Did I get that wrong?
#1 — where will the UN get the troops?
#2 — where will the money come from to pay for it?
#3 — who believes that the Security Council — which would have to approve military action — would pass such a resolution?
The climate change hoax is just a stalking horse for a one world totalitarian government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.