The F.B.I. never tried to place undercover agents or informants inside the Trump campaign, a highly anticipated inspector general’s report is expected to find.
The DoJ is investigating itself again, eh?
No undercover F.B.I. agents or informants.
Is there a particular, law-enforcement-or-F.B.I. specific usage of those terms, and so anyone put within the campaign doesn't fit those definitions?
OR, did the F.B.I. only facilitate someone ELSE putting in informants or agents (Ciamarella, Vindman)?
Or, did the F.B.I. just reach out to known never-Trumpers, but didn't place them?
How many FBI does the NYT have on staff these days?
How many FBI does the NYT have on staff these days?
Whitewash.
Except we already HAD this story and the FBI claimed it was an “informant” and not a “spy placed by the FBI”
Just one placed by the DNC who called the FBI as a concerned citizen.
"Found no evidence".
Did they actually LOOK, or did they studiously avoid existing evidence even after it was pointed out to them?
OR, this is cover, to set it up that there was never any possible legitimate purpose for the F.B.I. infiltrating the campaign, and so any such infiltration was, is, and by definition must be illegal?
ABSOLUTE BS.
Quit trying to ‘gaslight’ us ...
No informants just whistleblowing Democrats who set up sting operations and insulted Trump supporters who shop at Walmart...
New York Times still thinks they are a credible source of news, and can make up anything they want. It’s either they think that, or they are monkey see, monkey do like Schiff who so far gets away with it.
PANIC IN DC!
HISTORIC!
HUNTERS BECOME THE HUNTED!
BOMBSHELL!!!
.............Errrrr.......ummmmmmmmm..........Never mind.
I wonder what the rest of the story is here, the parts that the Deep State didn't want in the report. I'm guessing that we'll never see the truth but it's something like one of these:
"The Justice Department’s inspector general found that it was the CIA that placed undercover agents or informants inside Donald J. Trump’s campaign in 2016 . . ."
"The Justice Department’s inspector general found evidence that the FBI placed undercover agents or informants inside Donald J. Trump’s campaign in 2016, but they are talking about the F.B.I. because that is not the correct abbreviation for the Deep State's investigative arm."
"The Justice Department’s inspector general made a successful effort to look in all the wrong places and ensure that he found no evidence that the F.B.I. attempted to place undercover agents or informants inside Donald J. Trump’s campaign in 2016."
So many interpretations, and recent years have taught me to read this sort of exoneration as if Bill Clinton had written it. We are facing a coup from government insiders, and I do not trust anything from their Ministry of Propaganda.
The FBI already admitted it did this. They just didn’t like them referred to as ‘spies’ or ‘spying’.
Why would I beleive the NY Times now after they lied to me for 3 years about Russian collusion? Sorry, they have zero credibility any more.
Dem anxiety on High.
Trust Sessions!
No one ever said they did. What is at issue is the wiretapping. Sleazy CYA word games
So NY Slimes you lying to us now or on inauguration day 2017?
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/226311
NY Times reporter contradicts his own reports on wiretapping
Paging Lisa and Peter: What is an OCONUS Lure?
They just somehow “got there.”