Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Is King: A federal judge says White House aides must answer to Capitol Hill.
Wall Street Journal ^ | November 26, 2019

Posted on 11/26/2019 7:27:11 PM PST by karpov

You may have read that a judge has ordered that Don McGahn, the former White House counsel, must testify in response to a Congressional subpoena. What you probably didn’t read in the impeachment press is that the sweeping ruling essentially eliminates a right to confidentiality between a President and his most senior advisers.

“The primary takeaway from the past 250 years of recorded American history is that Presidents are not kings,” wrote Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson in a ruling late Monday that was hailed far and wide as a victory over President Trump’s claim that close advisers have immunity from testifying.

The judge doesn’t stop there. She embraces a doctrine of Congressional supremacy that essentially says that even the President’s closest advisers must appear on Capitol Hill more or less on command. “With respect to senior-level presidential aides, absolute immunity from compelled congressional process simply does not exist,” Judge Jackson writes.

These aides may be able to withhold some “confidential, classified, or privileged information” in the national interest. But that doesn’t protect advisers like the general counsel from appearing on Capitol Hill, under penalty of contempt, to respond to the priorities of the current Congressional majority.

You don’t have to be a constitutional scholar to see the risks here. If advisers can be forced to appear before partisan opponents on demand, White House discussions are likely to become more circumspect. Presidents are likely to get less honest advice, and advisers will get less candid insight into a President’s views.

Judge Jackson’s 118-page opinion blows past these concerns and dismisses long-time Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memos on adviser immunity as mere “aspirational assertions” about presidential power. This includes William Rehnquist’s 1971 OLC memo that has been relied on by Presidents of both parties.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clownbammyjudge; congress; districtofcolumbia; executiveprivilege; judiciary; ketanjibrownjackson; mcgahn; obamajudge; partybeforejustice; politicaljudiciary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: karpov

Ruling should be IGNORED. Not issued by the Supreme Court.


21 posted on 11/26/2019 8:01:43 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Wrong. Read the Federalist papers, and Jefferson’s writings on the unitary executive. Or, just read AG Barr’s last opinion column on the unitary executive.


22 posted on 11/26/2019 8:03:43 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

Corrupt judges should face more than just embarrassment.

I agree. I mean for a branch of government there is no oversite outside of the legislative branch for impeachment, and they know nothing ever happens with that (except Alice Hastings). As a result, they can rule contrary to their oath and outside of their limits of power. It’s time to get rid of life time appointments. There is nothing in the constitution that states that. It just says “good behavior” which should be literally interpreted as that. Behavior, not life time tenure. You behaved badly! You violated your oath! Here is the proof, your fired, Fock you!


23 posted on 11/26/2019 8:13:11 PM PST by Bommer (2020 - Vote all incumbent congressmen and senators out! VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff35

“He said that they had to respond, to go there and sit in the chair. Executive privileged is still on the table, the judge did not remove that.”

Exactly. The goofballs in the press did not read past the 2nd page.


24 posted on 11/26/2019 8:14:57 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Co-Equal does not mean "except one is more important than the other". Well, the judiciary has already usurped the "we are the numero uno top dog branch" so now this judge has ruled that our "co-equal" branches are acually ranked from highest to lowest 1) Judiciary 2) Legistlative and 3) Executive

Ignore her.

25 posted on 11/26/2019 8:17:51 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Members of Congress are not above the law, either.

This will not stand.


26 posted on 11/26/2019 8:19:09 PM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I think this is such an unwarranted abrogation of Constitutional separation of powers and the office of the Presidency that outright defiance is in order.


27 posted on 11/26/2019 8:22:28 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Would Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, appointed by Obama in 2012, have issued such a sweeping ruling if the President were not a white male Republican?

No. Ketanji is a Commie Democrat judgebot, programmed to spit out pro-Democrat rulings.

#PartyBeforeJustice

28 posted on 11/26/2019 8:22:56 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
The Judge got things really mixed up.

In Canada and other members of the Commonwealth Realm, we used to say: “Parliament is Supreme”. Our executive is embedded in Parliament; so, that never meant the same in the U.S.A.

It meant that Parliament was the final authority. Then, in 1982, we revised our Constitution. Now, in effect, the Judiciary is supreme, because it can overturn laws passed by Parliament, and subordinate legislation passed by Cabinet.

If this isn't overturned on appeal, it may mark the beginning of a transition to a purely ceremonial role for the President. In the Commonwealth, the Queen is our Head of State — with weak, mainly ceremonial powers. The Prime Minister is the Head of Government, where political power is concentrated. You could wind up with Trump wearing kingly garments and cutting ribbons; while Nancy Pelosi is Head of Government, and wielding all the power (or, at least all that's not ceded to the SCOTUS)

29 posted on 11/26/2019 8:28:48 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Ignore the dirtbag


30 posted on 11/26/2019 8:45:48 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

First off, who gives a f*ck what she says? Appeal her decision which will be overturned.

Or, just show up and advise Schiff that you’re invoking Executive Privilege and will be exercising your 5th Amendment rights as you cannot be compelled to answer any questions or make any statements.

Did the last occupant of the White House ever claim Executive Privilege?


31 posted on 11/26/2019 8:48:44 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Maybe I’m mistaken, but I think the “unitary executive” model simply means that the President has full authority over the executive branch of government. I wouldn’t argue with that point at all, because it’s true. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the President exerts any authority over the legislative branch of the U.S. government at all.


32 posted on 11/26/2019 8:50:39 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Ketanji Brown Jackson... Nothing else needs to be said...


33 posted on 11/26/2019 8:55:19 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

One judge, soon overturned.


34 posted on 11/26/2019 8:57:35 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Congress Is King: A federal judge says White House aides must answer to Capitol Hill.

Do federal judges answer to Congress?

NO.

It is federal judges who act as though they are kings and queens.

35 posted on 11/26/2019 9:11:44 PM PST by lightman (Byzantine Troparia: The "praise choruses" of antiquity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Judge Jackson’s 118-page opinion

The US Constitution is written on 4 (four) sheets, and if she needs 118 pages to make the argument, the chance that the argument is flawed is about 100%.

36 posted on 11/26/2019 9:12:53 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I enjoy your posts, but you gotta take the L on this one.


37 posted on 11/26/2019 9:12:59 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Buffoon? Yes Shameless? Absolutely Moron? Check Unqualified and only there because: black justice, female, no experience b/c that didn’t matter? Roger

But this decision will be overturned. She brings up 250yrs of history. That history sets a precedent that guys like McGahn don’t have to testify before anyone. And I would think that if he’s General Counsel/Lawyer, there should exist Attorney/Client Privilege. I know that went out the window with Cohen, but he was a willing participant trying to save his own butt.


38 posted on 11/26/2019 9:21:51 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

There are some really sharp folks on this site and lots of them and, thankfully, they bring a lot to the table from all sorts of different angles. As long as they don’t get nasty and condescending, which they sometimes do, folks have the opportunity to learn a lot from some of the commenters.

Anywho.... I wonder if anyone in the White House, or someone else close to POTUS, gets on here, Breitbart, Daily Caller, etc, to see what’s being bantered about and read some of these comments. Perhaps learn about a different angle of attack, so to speak.

Now it appears that the Dem’s, once again, have realized that they’ve fallen on their faces and are scrambling to salvage something from Schiff’s op.

In line with the information in your post, I just want to see two things:

1. A tweet from the President, calling out Schiff’s failure and then four simple words ...... My turn, Checkmate

2. The next morning announce that he is convening both houses of Congress and start dropping MOABs, all day long. Just have aides fill up tables with all the files of all their corruption, lies, and theft. Then, right when he’s about to walk out of the room, read the list of Congress-folks that used taxpayer dollars to settle sexual harassment claims.

Of course, if he did that, damn near every paramedic and emt in the greater DC area would have to be at the Capitol, as they all started stroking out and having heart attacks.

One can dream, can’t they?


39 posted on 11/26/2019 9:35:43 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: karpov

They need to give these judges a free Pinochet helicopter ride.


40 posted on 11/26/2019 9:43:41 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (Everything I Needed to Know About Islam I Learned on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson