Skip to comments.
Investors Penalize Companies for Adding Women to Their Boards
Bloomberg
| November 25, 2019
| Jeff Green
Posted on 11/25/2019 9:46:20 AM PST by karpov
No excerpt from Bloomberg allowed, story here.
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: corporateboards; quotas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
11/25/2019 9:46:20 AM PST
by
karpov
To: karpov
It’s not because they are women, it’s because they are (rightfully?) judged as less than optimum choices for their roles.
2
posted on
11/25/2019 9:49:32 AM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: karpov
You HARASSED me...!
Who is prettier, HER, or me...??!
3
posted on
11/25/2019 9:50:02 AM PST
by
gaijin
To: karpov
If anyone is biased, it is the market,Obviously, government needs to protect investors from themselves by requiring them to invest in a gender-blind manner.
4
posted on
11/25/2019 9:50:44 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: karpov
Yeah, investors suddenly no longer care about the ONE THING that they care about on account of their own sexisim. Right. Got it.
5
posted on
11/25/2019 9:51:28 AM PST
by
TalBlack
(Damn right I'll "do something" you fat, balding son of a bitc)
To: karpov
I KNOW why u won’t mentor me...!
Cuz you HATE women, don’t you...!
6
posted on
11/25/2019 9:51:39 AM PST
by
gaijin
To: karpov
Does this desk make me look fat?
7
posted on
11/25/2019 9:52:53 AM PST
by
headstamp 2
(There's a stairway to heaven, but there's a highway to hell.)
To: karpov
Just wait till the Gov demands that every board room has to have a Midget/ little person in a director position as well..
To: karpov
9
posted on
11/25/2019 9:54:46 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
To: karpov
It’s a high price to pay for being “stylish” , as Harry Callahan might say.
10
posted on
11/25/2019 9:56:33 AM PST
by
MayflowerMadam
("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")
To: Blueflag
The former CEO of Hewlett Packard is a poster girl for this sort of thing. Back in the old days when I owned so few stocks that I actually paid attention to shareholder election materials, I would vote against celebrity type board members who seemed to have little or no stake in the company's success. Not because they were women (though many were) but because they drew salaries far out of proportion to what they contributed.
A high salaried board member who own few or no shares of the company's stock does not give me the shareholder a warm and fuzzy feeling. It is as simple as that.
11
posted on
11/25/2019 9:57:48 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: uranium penguin
Just wait till the Gov demands that every board room has to have a Midget/ little person in a director position as well..They will definitely see smaller profits then!
To: karpov
13
posted on
11/25/2019 9:58:27 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: karpov
14
posted on
11/25/2019 10:00:49 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(BLACK LIVES MAGA)
To: uranium penguin
Just wait till the Gov demands that every board room has to have a Midget/ little person in a director position as well..OMGosh, that would be SO cool!
15
posted on
11/25/2019 10:01:33 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(BLACK LIVES MAGA)
To: karpov
I’ll know Leftists actually care about fairness when they institute redneck quotas at the C and D level...
16
posted on
11/25/2019 10:03:53 AM PST
by
chrisser
To: karpov
On a tangent issue....
Green portfolios in Blue State Pensions are lagging a full 100 basis points in performance. I got to see a group of investment gurus on a panel being reported on by Bloomberg and they were all singing from the Global Warming Choir, as they try to drag everyone ( specifically Utilities ) into this maddness. Talk about destroying one of the consistent hidden gems. What gets me the most is these are supposed to be the vaulted annointed ones, and they can't see it is a hoax....
17
posted on
11/25/2019 10:07:16 AM PST
by
taildragger
("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Songs of Angry Men!"lk)
To: karpov
“Investors are Sexists” is what they’re trying to say.
18
posted on
11/25/2019 10:20:39 AM PST
by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
To: karpov
One place where some freedom still exists, choosing where to invest. Investors are keenly aware that political correctness doesn’t guarantee financial returns.
19
posted on
11/25/2019 10:22:47 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: karpov
Investors won't mind if a woman is added to a board because of her knowledge and experience, but they will if she is hired to meet a quota. That is quite sensible.
The person hired to meet a quota may surprise you by being competent but the odds are not favorable.
20
posted on
11/25/2019 10:24:40 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(A hero is a hero no matter what medal they give him. Likewise a schmuck is still a schmuck.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson