Posted on 11/25/2019 9:46:20 AM PST by karpov
I have no problem with qualified women being on boards. If, however, a company adds a token female to satisfy some woke sjw whiners I will not own their stock or support them otherwise.
The erosion of meritocracy hurts the company, and shareholders literally see this.
Right up there with the pure BS “Diversity is our strength” bosh. That always rankled me.
Author Jeff Green is more WOKE than the average WOKE millennial. He is absolutely obsessed with WOKEness and writes nothing but garbage like this article...
Investors Penalize Companies for Adding Women to Their Boards, 11/19
Why Stop at 10%? Advocates Push for Even More LGBT Characters on TV, 11/19
Nike, Under Armour CEO Replacements Were Missed Opportunity for Women, 10/19
Women Exceed 25% of Board Seats on S&P 500 for the First Time, 10/19
Female CFOs Brought in $1.8 Trillion More Than Male Peers, 10/19
Black Executives Hold Few Positions That Lead to CEO Job, 10/19
Sexual Harassment Training Now Required for 20% of U.S. Workers, 10/19
The Few Startups with Female Founders Raise More Venture Cash, 10/19
Corporate Diversity Programs Are Working, Straight White Men Say, 9/19
The Cable Industry Adds More Women and Minorities, But Cant Keep Them, 9/19
Americas First Gay Credit Union Gets Green Light From Michigan, 9/19
WeWork Adds Harvard’s Frei to All-Male Board After Criticism, 9/19
Multinational Companies Reveal Gender Bias in Job Ads, 9/19
WeWorks All-Male Board Is Pretty Typical of IPOs These Days, 8/18
A $750 Billion Midwest Fund Group Pushes for Board Diversity, 8/19
Just wait till the Gov demands that every board room has to have a Midget/ little person in a director position as well..
I've been a reporter at Bloomberg since 2001 and for the last several years I've covered various aspects of corporate governance. I'm currently part of a team at Bloomberg that covers managing diversity - exploring how companies are adapting to changes in policy related to gender, race, sexuality, age and other topics. I also continue to write about corporate governance and workplace issues. When I'm not reporting, I'm a father of three who lives with his wife and dog in Troy, MI.
The bottom line for “diversity” is reduced efficiency and investors are well aware of it. When standards are lowered to get the right look, investors go elsewhere, as they should.
Diversity in 2019 has only one meaning (no white men allowed).
Why even give Bloomberg hits?
Yep - hiring women to meet some asinine gender “equality” goal instead of because they are the best fit is a recipe for disaster....just think about when they push for at least one each of the plethora of “new genders” because it’s a crime to put “women” in a limited niche like that because it makes it sound like there’s only two sexes....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.