Posted on 11/16/2019 3:15:51 AM PST by kevcol
Former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton weighed in on President Trump's tweet on Friday that criticized a witness in the impeachment inquiry, stating "witness intimidation is a crime."
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“””””””some fool will nominate her and she could very well receive the nomination from an exhausted convention””
That COULD happen if the democrats realized they have absolutely no chance against President Trump and throw her out there as an expendable candidate so the real ones can prepare for 2024.
The replies are hilarious. I think that Hillary, like many on the Left, live in a special world where they see only the image of themselves that they think the world sees. They create a lie and believe that the rest of the world believes it. This makes them incapable of seeing irony.
Hillary believes she has crafted the image of being the Good Witch in the “Wizard of Oz;” she’s the Mother Teressa of politics. She built that image and then moved her black heart into it. The rest of the world sees through the image and recognizes the black heart.
My feelings is this woman was "not America first" and that is why she needed to go.
There are a lot of Obama hold overs in the State Department, even if they did work for other Republican Presidents, that are bad and need to be removed.
This is probably the most bureaucratic org in the vast sea of the FERAL Government
Says the women who intimidated every female that her husband sexually assaulted!
Cato the Elder was always saying that about Carthage.
They tried with Bush as well with the federal attorneys.
as with Russia, why isn’t Clinton being grilled about Ukraine interference in the 2016 election to try to stop Donald Trump?
enough of this farce.
General Patton smelled the battlefield and visited the salted Carthage grounds..... per the movie
Is that the felony-committing Hillary commenting?
She’s always weighing in. She weighs in on floorboards,steps,chairs,couches,dining room booths.
Which leads one to question if she was a licensed attorney when she served on DNC's Watergate staff?
Hillary is a professional at this stuff.
She just eliminates the witnesses altogether. Arkanciding them by the dozens over the years.
I'm sure she regrets not eliminating all those bimbos that "erupted" after Bill's sexual exploits. Instead she "intimidated" them from being considered serious, accomplished women.
I'm sure they don't appear in her latest tome, The Book of Gutsy Woman.
I mean Margaret Thatcher didn't even make it into the book because, according to Hillary, Britains first woman prime minister did not do enough to knock down barriers for others.
Except for being a strong, conservative woman who broke the "glass ceiling", a phrase that Hillary reserves for herself. Even though she has never broken any glass ceilings. Unless you consider her being the first woman to be a two-time loser running for president as a first.
The woman is delusional. If you ever have a moment of regret about Trump being president, just count our blessings that she is not in White House instead of Trump.
Yes they are and yes you are, but like I mentioned yesterday which drew a lot of fire, what we think doesn’t matter or have any influence in judgement with this. What THEY decide to think is how the narrative will proceed with the media’s help.
Bimbo Eruptions...enough said
If you were cruel man, you may prefer asphalt, like me.
Not enough. The dust particles would compost and slime together forming a new, possibly more Constitutional-killing organism when reconstituted.
I would doubt Hlllary was a licensed attorney when she served on the Watergate staff but she probably didn’t need to be as she wasn’t giving legal advice to an outside party. You can still work in law for your own employer (in this case the Dem majority on Capitol Hill), you just can’t issue legal advice or appear in court on behalf of a client. In her case, she is either ignorant of the law or she knows a bit about it and deliberately violates it on a consistent basis.
Should have been: I have done FAR more for Ukraine than 0.
ML.NJ
Why do liberals use “full stop” at the end of statements?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.