Posted on 11/14/2019 9:11:29 AM PST by McGruff
White House counselor Kellyanne Conway confronted CNN's Wolf Blitzer on live television Thursday after he played footage of her husband criticizing President Trump and Republicans as part of MSNBC's coverage of the impeachment hearing the day before.
Conway accused CNN of "embarrassing" itself by playing the remarks from frequent Trump critic George Conway, suggesting it was only doing so in a bid to drive ratings and make her look bad.
Blitzer then told Conway he had a final question for her.
Its a sensitive question and its a political question. Its a substantive question," Blizter says. "I dont want to talk about your marriage, I know there are issues there. Your husband, George Conway, is a lawyer
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
By staying with him, she drives him further crazy, and at some point, perhaps this becomes valid grounds for a divorce ...
Anyone who chooses to be interviewed by Blitzer, or anyone else on CNN, deserves what they get.
Her husband was all over the TV yesterday, talking about the President. It was a valid question on Blitzer's part.
Gee, I don’t remember he Dems or Repubs acting like this over Mary Matalin and Carville.
Nah, she is only embarrassing herself and the fat pig she is still married to, she casts nothing on Trump.
If it really bothered Trump he'd fix the problem.
I think Kellyann can be useful in the up coming race, and if she becomes more bother than worth, Trump has no problem saying, "You're fired".
I did not need to know that.
The affair, I mean, not the lymphoma.
Hear! Hear!
Class is not CNN’s strong suit.
Fake news is their strong suit.
And Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.
5.56mm
She’s a public figure so she’s fair game as despicable as it me be. And when both spouses are out in the public eye, so is the marriage. As for her job, there are surely more than a few females with less baggage who could do as good or better job for Trump. I doubt there would be much if any fallout from Trump’s base if she were to be let go. It would be kinder in the long run for the children. I’m sure the husband makes enough money to ensure Kelly Anne won’t have to use the orange welfare card at the checkout of the local discount super market. And she would have all the time she needs to write that book which should be a brisk seller given the breadth of her fan club.
Even James Carville would not do this to Mary Ann Matalin.
The Conways are beyond dysfunctional.
What does this have to do with what I wrote?
For real or Fake News to smear her?
Yep.
Time to get out or get done with her husband.
Does not say when that was. Pre 2001 they were dating, not having an affair.
I assume the Affair was before she Married George.
I’ll have to wake her up and ask her about it.
Link please.
George is Kellyanne’s problem, and I don’t care how she chooses to solve it. Neither, apparently, does Trump think it is his problem, or he would do something about it.
Regardless, we are all entitled to an opinion, and mine is that you are way too generous to that jelly-like piece of dog-excrement on the bottom of Kellyanne’s shoe.
:)
Kellyanne handled it as well as one could be expected to do.
Still, you can’t really blame Blitzer for bringing it up.
The issue is so very obvious to everyone.
I greatly value Kellyanne’s presence handling interviews for the president, but her ‘marriage situation’ has become a distraction, sorry to say.
It was inappropriate for Wolf to analyze her marriage on the air that way, but any newsman would be tempted to bring it up. Reporters are for the most part, very nosy people.
Those same questions are on everyone’s mind to some degree.
She’s a tough Lady, for sure. Most would have dissolved in tears, or become enraged, having their very private life thrown on the countertop for close focus and open speculation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.