You'll now be unfriended on Facebook by any rabid liberals! (which is usually not a bad thing). EVERYBODY PANIC!!
Posted on 11/13/2019 1:06:30 PM PST by libstripper
Full title:
"Rand Paul Goes There – Drops ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella’s Name on Live Broadcast – Demands Testimony (AUDIO)"
Excerpt:
Rand Paul finally went there — after threatening to out the CIA whistleleaker, the Kentucky Senator dropped Eric Ciaramella’s name during an interview on DC-based WMAL.
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” Rand Paul said.
“But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
“”””””””””Personally, I think it’s Taylor..”””””””
He sure came off as a complete doosh today.
If I read the statement correct. Sen Paul attacked the flank rather than frontal assault. He indicated that an individual named Ciarmella was a material witness in the Hunter Biden affair because of close association.
By using the name Ciarmella, the alleged whistle blower is kept in the news and we learn there is in fact a bigger kettle of hot water with fish in it. The Ciarmella corruption thus supersedes and replaces the telephone call hoax where the name is taboo.
The press can now use the name with impunity discussing Rand Paiuls assertions
Brilliant gambit
The Democrats will never put that stiff on the stand.
“Now “get tough” with him, Schiff. Lol...”
Why should Schifferbrains get tough with him? I heard Schiffy say just this morning in the hearings he doesn’t know the “whistleleakers” name.
My lands, dude. You can’t read. It’s there in black and white: both “whistleblower” and “Eric Ciaramella” in the same conversation.
Don’t trust GP. Trust the transcript. Trust the audio.
Sheesh, you really REALLY hat GP for some bizarre reason.
How many times does shifty have to say it? “I said it wasn’t true the first time. I said it wasn’t true the second time and I’ll say it the 40th time, - I DO NOT KNOW who it is!
With a straight face!
Unbelievable. Guess you can say I watched the farce. I closed my eyes and listened and opened them when I heard a Republican being called on.
It will be fun later tonight to see what the LSM reports. Will they say it’s over and done with right now. It was such a success??
I’m in the Facebook gulag right now for posting links to stories mentioning his name. The last time, I screen captured my post and posted the capture after the first post was deleted. My comment was “As expected. It took 40 minutes.” Off to the gulag I went, it seems for taunting them.
I knew Paul eventually would do this.
I really thought he’d do it on the Sunday show he was on
Please post a slightly smaller version—the leaker’s cut off.
They’d best get used to wearing those ugly frowny faces: they’re gonna be wearing them for a long time to come.
Yes it was. The Republicans appear to be organized. I have a lot of confidence in Nunes and Jordan, and Paul. These people are not just looking out for Trump but also the Republic itself
Eric CIAramello. haul him in.
Yes it was brilliant.
And wait for the first democrat connected to the inquiry in the House to publicly state that Sen. Paul outed the whistleblower. To which Sen. Paul can say, “No I didn’t, I never called him the whistleblower ... but you just did”
And with one sentence Schiff if painted in a corner.
RAND PAUL DID NOT NAME THE ‘WHISTLEBLOWER’!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.