Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Bright Idea: Scrap the Solar Investment Tax Credit
Townhall.com ^ | November 13, 2019 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 11/13/2019 4:51:55 AM PST by Kaslin

Without a doubt, President Trump's pro-growth policies have resulted in a booming economy with unemployment rates at historic lows. This extraordinary era of job creation has been made possible in part thanks to the Trump Administration's laser focus on slashing regulations for energy producers and long overdue reductions to the burdensome tax code. However, to keep the economy flourishing, the D.C. swamp needs more draining, and the first target should be to eliminate an unfair tax credit that only still exists thanks to crony capitalism and renewable energy lobbyists.

Temporary tax incentives can encourage innovation but must include mandates requiring businesses to stand on their own. Fifteen years ago, the Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC) was created when solar energy was an emerging market. Now, the solar energy sector is experiencing explosive growth and is about to out-compete natural gas on the cost of energy, thanks to endless taxpayer-funded support and local government mandates.

With extensive foreign investment in solar manufacturing facilities in the United States and now renewable energy accounts for more than one-third of all new generating capacity. In fact, there is so much activity in the solar energy sector, the market has been flooded with cut-rate solar panels, largely thanks to China which stole intellectual property worth billions of dollars. Times have certainly changed, and there is no reason to extend generous solar tax subsides.

Interestingly, the ITC was set to expire in 2019, until Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and five congressmen from the West and East coasts have submitted a proposal to extend for five years, with the hopes of House passage just before Christmas recess. Why would members of Congress be so interested in continuing green energy tax subsidies, which mostly benefit the wealthy? As left-wing Vox.com admitted, clean energy tax credits are highly regressive, with a majority benefiting the top quintile of income earners.

If you are one of those Tesla-driving coastal elites and want to power your home by solar energy with the current price tag of $22,000 for a typical 6-kilowatt residential rooftop system, you should have the freedom to do so. But the tax code and D.C. lobbyists should not force your neighbors to pay for it.

Instead of focusing on special tax credits or obsessing over impeachment, Congress would be wise to continue the tax reform after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. President Trump's signature tax-cut legislation lowered rates removed many individual carve-outs. Extending this solar tax credit would violate the spirit of this major tax-cutting victory.

Congress should change the arbitrary way it offers energy tax credits. Washington, D.C. bureaucrats should not be empowered to pick winners and losers based on political reasons. It's time for Congress to act and stop solar government subsidies.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: energy

1 posted on 11/13/2019 4:51:55 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A better idea - stop manipulating the free market in general.


2 posted on 11/13/2019 4:53:03 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The writer is lazy. He digs around in the bottom of his desk drawer and finds this topic

He certainly knows that it is more likely that PBS will be defunded before the energy tax credit grail


3 posted on 11/13/2019 4:58:16 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I’ve seen the solar ITC used for the installation of solar farms in parts of the Northeast that get fewer sunny days in a topical year than Seattle or Portland.

This is Keynesian economics combined with fascism at its worst ... building sh!t regardless of whether or not it even works in the long run.

4 posted on 11/13/2019 5:02:57 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yep, scrap the subsidies, Under current law they begin a slow years long PHASEOUT under current law. We should accelerate that phaseout or, as a minimum, at least continue to phaseout as provided under current law.

Below is a link with some extracted language explaining the phaseout..

https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2019/11/seia-garners-industry-support-and-lobbies-for-itc-extension/

“The ITC is a federal tax subsidy that, in its current capacity, gives solar system owners a 30% return on a solar project’s total tax liability in any market segment. In 2020 the ITC is slated to drop to 26%, 22% in 2021 and in 2022 it will decrease to a 10% subsidy for commercial and utility markets, and zero for residential, indefinitely.”


5 posted on 11/13/2019 5:10:24 AM PST by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is a PERFECT program to be done at the state level. If the states want to do it, let them, as it’s not too expensive and states like Alaska and the western part of Washington get virtually NOTHING from solar power. If they want to be idiots...let them, but don’t punish honest people in Kansas because of it.


6 posted on 11/13/2019 5:17:57 AM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’d love to see the subsidy dropped...it would save the farmland in MA that is being gobbled up by this plague.


7 posted on 11/13/2019 5:19:17 AM PST by small farm girl (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Scrap every tax credit. They are artificial wealth generation.


8 posted on 11/13/2019 5:33:52 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We have a huge farm under construction in our area. The problem is....it doesn't benefit the Town in which it lies, it goes right to the grid.

Rich farmlands were sacrificed and the farmer has an income for life and beyond and doesn't have to do a damn thing.

Bottom line....The Town loses.

9 posted on 11/13/2019 5:38:08 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“We have a huge farm under construction in our area. The problem is....it doesn’t benefit the Town in which it lies, it goes right to the grid.
Rich farmlands were sacrificed and the farmer has an income for life and beyond and doesn’t have to do a damn thing.

Bottom line....The Town loses.”

You’re lucky. They rammed the damn ugly windmills down our throats in the Midwest. By the thousands.


10 posted on 11/13/2019 5:48:13 AM PST by CrazyIvan (The Democrat party. A collaboration of Cloward-Piven and Dunning-Kruger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They're talking about windmills in the Great Lakes (I'm on Ontario).

Stupid because....we have an opportunity for natural gas via fracking and the damn politicians say....no way. They're just plain stupid....and it's all about money payoffs.

11 posted on 11/13/2019 5:56:18 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Especially Mexifornia, who now mandates that all new housing have solar panels

Watch Newsom scream the loudest


12 posted on 11/13/2019 6:04:19 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Won’t happen in Iowa. They are committed to so-called renewable energy, especially that inefficient eyesore they call wind power. Had to laugh when I read in the DM Register that the broken blades on the turbines end up in landfills. Ooops...


13 posted on 11/13/2019 6:28:07 PM PST by Pining_4_TX ("Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." ~ H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Oil is created deep within the Earth and works it’s way to the surface.

The Earth is benefited by us taking out the oil.
The Earth creates more oil than we use.
Just like water. No matter how much we drink, there will always be more water on the Earth than we can use.


14 posted on 11/15/2019 7:04:02 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson