Skip to comments.
Review of Russia Inquiry Grows as F.B.I. Witnesses Are Questioned
NYT ^
| Oct. 19, 2019
| Adam Goldman and William K. Rashbaum
Posted on 10/19/2019 7:11:33 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
The NYT is creating the narrative the Durham/Barr investigations are nothing more than Trump seeking revenge on his political enemies.
To: yesthatjallen
When the Slimes says “unfounded” that means it is true with metaphysical certainty!
2
posted on
10/19/2019 7:13:56 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
To: yesthatjallen
Russian collusion hoax = Real
Investigating the origins of the Russian hoax = Right-wing, white-supremacist wacko conspiracy! Damnit, why can’t Drumpf just let us destroy him like we do to all other Republicans?
To: yesthatjallen
Ironic, since that was the reason for the Russian hoax and impeachment.
To: yesthatjallen
The NYT is pure propaganda.
5
posted on
10/19/2019 7:15:48 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: yesthatjallen
If theyre creating that narrative, then theres a reason for it. I suspect the B-17 squadron is right over the target.
6
posted on
10/19/2019 7:15:55 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
To: cgbg
When the Slimes says unfounded that means it is true with metaphysical certainty!
Has there ever, in recorded history, been an allegation (absurd or not) leveled against a conservative that was labeled unfounded in MSM reportage?
Yes, its a rhetorical question.
7
posted on
10/19/2019 7:17:59 AM PDT
by
daler
To: yesthatjallen
It’s almost like they are accusing him of doing what they did.
Which would be an unprecedented tactic.
8
posted on
10/19/2019 7:20:18 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Where's Hunter?)
To: yesthatjallen
Well so what! What they are trying to do is akin to trying to stop an Abrams tank by shooting tennis balls at it.
9
posted on
10/19/2019 7:21:45 AM PDT
by
DarthVader
(Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
To: daler
The other dig is when they throw in “without evidence.”
10
posted on
10/19/2019 7:22:13 AM PDT
by
garyb
(What if you can't trust the voice in your head?)
To: yesthatjallen
The Old Gray Whore is foolish in actively attempting to discredit the investigation.
Pissing into the wind is counter productive
11
posted on
10/19/2019 7:22:35 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: yesthatjallen
Closely overseen by Mr. Barr, Mr. Durham and his investigators have sought help from governments in countries that figure into right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation...
—
If the Dems did nothing wrong, and these are all conspiracy theories, then there is nothing to worry about with Dunham’s investigation. Right NYTimes?
12
posted on
10/19/2019 7:25:06 AM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
To: Alberta's Child
A good defense is a good offense.
They're trying to get ahead of the release of these investigations.
They're going on the offense that these investigations are purely political. When the reports are released this will be their defense.
To: yesthatjallen
[Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked without evidence as a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent him from winning the 2016 election.]
Murder investigations typically start with on the basis of suspicions. Only with a full investigation, can a determination as to whether those suspicions are correct be made. The Times doesn’t want an investigation to proceed because of what it might unearth.
14
posted on
10/19/2019 7:28:02 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: yesthatjallen
some good clues in the article
His team has interviewed private Ukrainian citizens, a Justice Department spokeswoman has said without explaining why.
To: yesthatjallen
Leakers in the FBI and the NYTs trying to control the narrative before the investigation is released.
16
posted on
10/19/2019 7:30:13 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: yesthatjallen
Two former senior F.B.I. agents are assisting with the review, the people saidHmmm....
17
posted on
10/19/2019 7:32:40 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
To: yesthatjallen
NYT’s source is equivalent to “someone who breathed at some time”. They have descended to “fake leaking”.
To: Flick Lives
If the Dems did nothing wrong, and these are all conspiracy theories, then there is nothing to worry about with Dunhams investigation. Right NYTimes?
************
Exactly right. If they’re so innocent they should welcome, if not push for, this investigation.
To: yesthatjallen
...right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation... Journalism. It's dead Jim.
20
posted on
10/19/2019 7:40:52 AM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson