[yesthatjallen]

The NYT is creating the narrative the Durham/Barr investigations are nothing more than Trump seeking revenge on his political enemies.

[cgbg]

When the Slimes says “unfounded” that means it is true with metaphysical certainty!

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Russian collusion hoax = Real
Investigating the origins of the Russian hoax = Right-wing, white-supremacist wacko conspiracy! Damnit, why can’t Drumpf just let us destroy him like we do to all other Republicans?

[outpostinmass2]

Ironic, since that was the reason for the Russian hoax and impeachment.

[Brilliant]

The NYT is pure propaganda.

[Alberta's Child]

If they’re creating that narrative, then there’s a reason for it. I suspect the B-17 squadron is right over the target.

[chris37]

It’s almost like they are accusing him of doing what they did.

Which would be an unprecedented tactic.

[DarthVader]

Well so what! What they are trying to do is akin to trying to stop an Abrams tank by shooting tennis balls at it.

[bert]

The Old Gray Whore is foolish in actively attempting to discredit the investigation.

Pissing into the wind is counter productive

[Flick Lives]

Closely overseen by Mr. Barr, Mr. Durham and his investigators have sought help from governments in countries that figure into right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation...

—

If the Dems did nothing wrong, and these are all conspiracy theories, then there is nothing to worry about with Dunham’s investigation. Right NYTimes?

[Zhang Fei]

[Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked without evidence as a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent him from winning the 2016 election.]

---

Murder investigations typically start with on the basis of suspicions. Only with a full investigation, can a determination as to whether those suspicions are correct be made. The Times doesn’t want an investigation to proceed because of what it might unearth.

[janetjanet998]

some good clues in the article

---

His team has interviewed private Ukrainian citizens, a Justice Department spokeswoman has said without explaining why.

[marktwain]

Leakers in the FBI and the NYTs trying to control the narrative before the investigation is released.

[Jim Noble]

Two former senior F.B.I. agents are assisting with the review, the people said

Hmmm....

[Chewbarkah]

NYT’s source is equivalent to “someone who breathed at some time”. They have descended to “fake leaking”.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

...right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation...

Journalism. It's dead Jim.

[BobL]

“have attacked without evidence...right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation”

With the Veritas recordings now released, the flat-out lies coming out of the media are a lot easier to not take seriously.

We now LAUGH at them.

[chuckee]

You can tell fake news by the number adjectives that are planted in a story to create a subliminal narrative. The more adjectives, the less credible the story is. Nouns are great for factual stories. Any time I read a Times story about politics, a noun is as rare as an ice cube in hell. I can glean more facts from a National Enquirer story than I can from that piece of garbage NYT

[Fido969]

“Without evidence”?

Tons of evidence.

Wonder if they’ll use that term to described Pencil Neck’s accusations.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

which Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked without evidence as a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent him from winning the 2016 election.

Without proof? Really? Wow.

[LS]

We don’t care what “narrative” they try to create. Everyone knows.

The problem is, this is “investigations,” and so far, no grand juries and no indictments.

Wake me when someone goes to jail.