Click pic to see full screen
Posted on 10/19/2019 4:18:23 AM PDT by Liz
Brad Parscale, Trump's campaign manager, tweeted these amazing stats gleaned from Trump's Dallas rally last Thursday.
53,985 voters identified
12% have not voted in the last 4 elections
21.4% Democrat
11% Latino
These are winning numbers that will help win #FourMoreYears for @realDonaldTrump!
We continue to outperform 2016, Parscale tweeted.
NOTE: Trump is raising huge amts of campaign cash online with one simple sentence: "Help us fight Democrat impeachment."
T/Y.......a Green Beret original.
Nice insight.
Excellent. :)
(HAT TIP FREEPER GRUMPY GRESH WRT Dems' secret agenda to do "the people's work."):
1. Meetings with HSBC banking reps to arrange money laundering for cartels. Payoffs to politicians to off shore secret accounts.
2. Meetings between DEA agents and Mexican cartel reps to negotiate how many drugs will be seized and where as well as who will take the fall.
3. Meetings between DEA officials, middlemen and HBSC agents to arrange recycling of captured drugs to middlemen and back into the market.
4. Meetings with Chinese officials and DEA on fentanyl importing to Mexico and direct to US.
5. Meetings with US commanders in Afghanistan regarding opium imports and processing into heroin in Mexico or elsewhere.
======================================
House Republicans demand details on Dems' mysterious trips to Mexico
Fox News ^ | 09/09/2019 | Adam Shaw, Brooke Singman / FR Posted by Olog-hai
EXCERPT Republicans on the House Oversight Committee are calling on their Democratic colleagues to provide more details about a series of trips taken to Mexico while staff were touring border detention facilities, amid reports that at least one Democrat has been involved in “coaching” migrants there on how to exploit U.S. immigration law.
In a letter to Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., obtained by Fox News, ranking member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said there were at least two committee staff trips into Mexico in August — one of which required Border Patrol agents to provide a special escort back into the U.S.
“Although you have the authority to direct Committee staff to travel internationally on official committee business, you have not explained why you authorized this travel into Mexico or what you sought to learn through these trips,” Jordan wrote, adding that Republicans were not notified of the trips. Jordan went on to accuse Democrats of seeking “to delegitimize the administration’s border security efforts and vilify the men and women who protect our border.” He said GOP members are concerned the trips “could continue to result in misleading information about the administration’s border security efforts.”Fox News has reached out to Cummings' office for a response to Republicans' claims. […]
According to The Washington Examiner, staff from (Texas Democratic Representative Veronica) Escobar’s office recently coached migrants in Ciudad Juárez on how to exploit federal immigration law — including telling would-be border crossers to pretend they cannot speak Spanish to exploit a loophole that would let them enter the US. ......more at foxnews.com.....
===========================================
The late Chairman Elijah Cummings, Democrat-Md, apparently authorized at least two tax-paid committee staff
trips to Mexico in August — one of which required Border Patrol agents to provide a special escort back into the U.S.
CONG JIM JORDAN WRITES: “.....you have the authority to direct Committee staff to travel internationally
on official committee business, yet you have not explained
<><> (A) why you authorized tax-paid travel to Mexico or<><> (B) what you sought to learn through these trips,”
adding that Republicans were not notified of the trips.
ELECTORAL VOTE ANALYSIS---A 2020 projection where Trump wins re-election handily (via The Hill):
President Trump appears likely to win reelection next year, according to three different economic models Moody’s Analytics uses to measure presidential contests. Moody’s modeling, which has only missed on one presidential election since 1980, found that Trump, who won by a 304-227 margin in the Electoral College in 2016, could easily surpass those results in 2020......the 2020 projection by pollster Mark Zandi looks very bad for Democrats.
The three different models showed Trump winning either 289, 332 or 351 votes in the Electoral College over his eventual opponent. The projections are based on how consumers feel about their financial situations, stock market gains achieved under Trump and the prospects for unemployment.
“If the economy a year from now is the same as it is today, or roughly so, then the power of incumbency is strong and Trump’s election odds are very good, particularly if Democrats aren’t enthusiastic and don’t get out to vote,” Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics and co-author of the paper, told CNBC. “It’s about turnout.”
Of the three models, Trump performs best under the “pocketbook” measure, which gauges how people feel about their finances.
Democrats are consumed by impeachment and are accusing each other of being Russian spies.
Love it!
DONALDCRATS
Donaldcrats
: )
Great
Nobody does it better! Makes me feel sad for the rest. Nobody does it half as good as Trump. Donald you’re the best!
That’s awesome! I love hearing that we as a collective are working our butts off. I think we just might make 2020 the year president trump not only wins the electoral with a higher amount but the popular vote as well. I’d like that just to shut the national popular vote contract people to shut up. That’d be hilarious if California was forced to give trump the electoral votes. Of course they are not to 270 yet so that won’t happen.
They are patriots to the US Constitution.
JoMa
I dont think Biden is ready to make the decision to pack up>>>>>>>
A lot of noise in the Swamp is saying Hillary will run. She is starting to position herself by cancelling public appearances with those who are too radical.
See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3787405/posts
If that happens, then Slow Joe will pack it in for sure.
Click pic to see full screen
Waboom!
Love Sun Tzu.
. . . which is precisely what we observed on 9/12/09, when about a million opponents of Obamacare congregated on the Mall in DC.Reaction of the journalism cartel? Crickets.
The Republican Party must sue the journalism cartel. The named defendant must be, “The Associated Press, all other wire services, and all members/subscribers thereof.” The tort must be, libel, and antitrust violations. The wire services were created to conserve scarce, expensive telegraphy bandwidth in the distribution of news. But that created virtual meetings of all major journalism outlets, and
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.- Adam Smith, Wealth of Nationsthe inevitable result has been a conspiracy to promote journalism at the expense of the public. Journalism’s propaganda campaign to the effect that journalism is objective is inherently false because objectivity is a laudable goal but not a state of being. Efforts to attain objectivity are hard and unpleasant work because journalists - or anyone - believes that their own opinions are true and not self-interested. And attempting to be objective means denying one’s self the luxury of taking that for granted.For journalists to claim their own objectivity does not reflect truth, but instead it tends to redefine objectivity to mean whatever is congenial to self-satisfied journalists within their cozy mutual admiration society.
Journalism is about bad news - news which reflects ill on society and thus promotes the idea that more government is needed. Thus journalism, empowered by its wire service cartel, defines “liberal” or “progressive” or “moderate” or “centrist” - any and all politically positive labels - to mean nothing other than what is congenial to promoters of big government.
The effect is that the journalism cartel systematically libels conservatives, and never libels “liberals.”
The defense would cite the unanimous 1964 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision, which asserted that the right of government officials to sue for libel was reduced by the First Amendment. But the First Amendment did no such thing. Antonin Scalia pointed out that the Bill of Rights was, you could say, politically an emergency measure. The Constitution was new, and had been ratified narrowly on a promise to add a bill of rights by amendment. That promise had to be fulfilled, or the legitimacy of the whole Constitution would have been lost. Accordingly, the Bill of Rights enumerated only the rights that government was most likely, historically, to violate - and covered the rest in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
andThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.Scalia’s point was that it was important that none of the enumerated rights be controversial. The rights which were enumerated, therefore already existed, in the eyes of the people, at the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights. “The” freedom of the press already existed - freedom of the press within the constraints of pornography and libel law. It would have been controversial to have attempted to repeal libel law, and could have been seen to have been a poison pill designed to kill the Bill of Rights. Precisely the sentiment that the Federalists could not afford to provoke.So libel law and pornography law survived the passage of the First Amendment untouched. Since the Sullivan decision claims that the First Amendment changed libel law, it is to that extent incorrect. And Sullivan was oblivious to the fact that the wire services created an anti-conservative journalism cartel. Given the drastic, orders-of-magnitude, decline in the cost of telegraphy bandwidth which characterizes the Internet Era, can you imagine the Feds allowing the AP to be created now, if it didn’t already exist?
In the Nineteenth Century, telegraphy bandwidth cost was a significant factor. Now, it is de minimus.
9M left and he is burning $ like crazy.
He will be burnt out and done before Thanksgiving!
Keep watching after the Biden Turkey Bomb hits the ground.
“I fear for the safety of our President, may he have the best security and may Divine Providence continue to shield him from harm.”
________________________
Holy Father, please hear our prayers; see that he possesses the wisdom to succeed in this undertaking.
We pray in the Name of JESUS.
Amen!
Ya but that was just because the line was so long if no lines 200,000
Three years ago an old blue collar worker in the rest belt said he never thought the day would come when he'd vote for a Republican... and he did - he voted for Trump.
We can help switch registration for people attending rallies... give them the opportunity to become Republicans...Wanting President Trump to win is good - but giving him the House allows him to get more things done...
Great idea... but let's also have our people carry those sign at Biden's rallies... We can follow Biden from stop to stop - town to town.
Very Alinsky of you...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.