Skip to comments.
FULL TITLE: Jason Chaffetz: Pelosi and impeachment – There have already been 3 votes. Here's why...
Fox News ^
| 17 October 2019
| Jason Chaffetz
Posted on 10/17/2019 7:00:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
FULL TITLE: Jason Chaffetz: Pelosi and impeachment There have already been 3 votes. Here's why there may not be a fourth
Speaker Pelosi isn't refusing to hold a vote on impeachment. She is refusing to hold a fourth vote on impeachment. There have already been three votes. They all failed. Miserably.
In other words, Congress has explicitly voted NOT to pursue impeachment.
In December 2017, January 2018, and against in July 2019 under Pelosi's leadership, the House held votes on whether to open an impeachment inquiry. The results weren't even close.
All three votes came up as "privileged resolutions." Under Congressional rules, members can vote to table the resolution or to proceed. To affirmatively table a privileged resolution kills it, meaning the resolution has failed.
Though the first two impeachment votes came up during the Republican majority, the votes to reject or table them were indisputably bipartisan.
In December 2017 there were 126 Democrats who joined House Republicans to reject Rep. Al Green's impeachment resolution 364-58.
A month later, a new resolution was introduced with similar results: Again, 121 Democrats voted to table. Support for impeachment rose from 58 votes in December to 66 in January. But that was before Democrats won a majority in 2018 and Nancy Pelosi became Speaker.
Do any of us want to live in a country where Congress can unambiguously reject legislation and the Speaker of the House can force it through anyway?
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: Texas; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 201712; 201801; 201907; algreen; botox; california; coup; house; impeachment; jasonchaffetz; massachusetts; michigan; mittwit; nancypelosi; pelosi; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; texas; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
21
posted on
10/18/2019 10:48:43 AM PDT
by
bitt
To: LucyT
In December 2017 there were 126 Democrats who joined House Republicans to reject Rep. Al Green's impeachment resolution 364-58. A month later, a new resolution was introduced with similar results: Again, 121 Democrats voted to table. Support for impeachment rose from 58 votes in December to 66 in January.
With Democrats having won dozens of new seats, Rep. Green tried again just three months ago in July 2019. His impeachment resolution was one of four introduced in the 116th Congress. This time even more Democrats voted against an inquiry 137 up from 121 in the previous Congress.
The House has explicitly voted against pursuing an impeachment inquiry, hence the current proceeding is invalid. Just because Speaker Pelosi decrees there is an impeachment inquiry doesn't make that inquiry valid. To the contrary, that motion was brought to the floor of the House and it failed three times. These are the seeds of a Constitutional crisis.
22
posted on
10/18/2019 11:02:14 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(America First!)
To: bitt
Democrats Cut Scalise Mic to Avoid Impeachment Question
Yesterday on the House floor the Democrats cut the microphone when Minority Whip Representative Steve Scalise was speaking. Congressman Scalise asked, Has the House been authorized to conduct an impeachment inquiry into President Trump?
23
posted on
10/18/2019 11:11:54 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(America First!)
To: bigbob
24
posted on
10/18/2019 7:20:36 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: trebb
Ahh, another Parrothead, it would appear!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Democrats only believe in democracy when they win. No, IMHO, the democrats always believe in democracy, the 51% and mob rule.
What they do not believe in are the rights of the people and a republican form of government.
26
posted on
10/19/2019 2:28:37 AM PDT
by
eartick
(Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
To: Vendome
And there is one less vote now to imprach because Elijah Cummings is room temperature and there needs to be a special election to replace him.
27
posted on
10/19/2019 2:34:08 AM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
To: eartick
“IMHO, the democrats always believe in democracy, the 51% and mob rule.
What they do not believe in are the rights of the people and a republican form of government.”
The media and Democrats, favorite words when discussing their view of American Government. “Our Democracy”. Just another lie on the lips of those who would enslave us if they could. I am beginning to think that even Democracy is NOT what they want to believe in, when tyranny is what they seem to desire, as you have so eloquently stated.
28
posted on
10/19/2019 3:08:08 AM PDT
by
wita
(Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
To: JennysCool
Jimmy actually built a Casino down here and it went bust so he put up a entertainment facility that caters to kids called “Margaritaville”,
Wouldn’t call myself a “Parrothead” but I do have some of his music.
29
posted on
10/19/2019 3:19:33 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The COUP continues-—with the identity of a Shape Shifter.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson