I’m sorry, but having this determined by 9 people is insane. This shouldn’t even be entertained by courts. Now we have to pray that sanity prevails.
Good article.
We would all be better off if the court was required to say, “In the matter of Law XXXXX, passed by Congress on MM/DD/YYYY, the court finds the law to be unconstitutional and we hereby abrogate it.” Or some such. Or else support the identified law.
Legislating from the bench is a bad thing. Wait for Congress to do something, then consider saying they did something wrong. But the Court should not act first.
No.
It is beyond the job of congress. It is a direct assault on freedom of association.
The government should not be involved in this at all.
What I know about transgenders. .
Dudes get themselves mutilated then demand to be called women, and vice versa.
They’re all mental and lying to them about what they’ve done is cruel.
Sex is extremely binary, male or female, with very rare exceptions. It is a genetic characteristic.
Gender is a construct. A behavioral issue.
“ACLU attorney David Cole suggested the Court is empowered to read into the statute a definition that was not originally intended by Congress and, “if the democratic process disagrees…it can change it.””
BS... they’ll do the same as they did when Congress passed the Defense of Marriage act. The court will just overrule Congress and create their own unchallengeable law if they don’t agree with the will of the people.