we're going to need you to wear a bag on your head while you testify."
...so they won't be able to see Brennan's face, I suppose.
What a farce!
LOL - fortunately people in the middle are seeing through this more and more.
What a crock of Schiff.
It's a composite character Democrats created to leak false intel on Trump.
If anything Democrats are likely trying to find someone who can play the role in public just like they did with Christine Blasey Ford.
I’d call this “harboring a felon”.
So they bring in No. 2.....who will corroborate what No. 1 said....and No. 1 will corroborate what No. 2 says.
Sounds like the kids in the playground who deciding what to tell mom about "the incedent".....
If all the kids agree on the story....Mom will believe.
Except Mom isn't dumb....and neither are we.
Why? Does Hillary Clinton want him whacked?
BECAUSE...there is no “whistleblower”!
Ol’ Schiff-face simply filed a bunch of papers, and !SHAZAM! a “whistleblower” appears!
We’ve had the transcript for how long already? Now we are going to get to hear what the actual guy who leaked it to the first Whistleblower remembers? Isn’t that a crime of itself? Or did he wright it all down or copy the phone call? Also a crime. And now he is going to what? Sit up there in a hood with a phony voice and read the transcript? Burn the CIA to the ground. Fire everyone, end all the pensions. Enough of this TREASON!
It’s like the msm and dems live in a complete fantasy world and expect others to live there with them
This person is not a whistleblower. This person leaked classified information they weren’t allowed access to. This leaker should be arrested, indicted and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. If that happened I suspect we wouldn’t have any more “whistleblowers” stepping up to the plate. I suspect the 2nd one knows the gubmint will figure out he told the 1st scum bag about the call and he is just trying to save his wothless, gossiping, seditious self by saying he is a whistleblower. They both belong in the same cell Epstein was in.
Of course, since we already have the transcript of the call, what, exactly, are they revealing?
BTW, why would a Ukrainian investigation into corruption hurt Joe Biden?
LOL.
5.56mm
I keep seeing this.
Can somebody tell me what the justification is for these "growing concerns" about safety?
Does the country have a history of assassinating government witnesses?
Do the Republicans have a history of assassinating government witnesses?
Does President Trump have a history of even roughing up somebody?
Or are the Democrats projecting again (*cough* Mark *cough* Rich *cough* Andrew *cough* Breitbart *cough*) ?
-PJ
CNN is nuts. Will buy a ticket to see these Nazis hanged for treason.
The best way to do that is to make the person's ID public.
If anything happens to them then criminal complaints can be taken.
What a public service that would be. All kinds of crimes could be prevented by doing so.
/showing flaws in some idiot's thinking
How convenient. SCIFs in the belly of the Deep State beast - CIA and NSA respectively.
But there is no Deep State so any concerns are silly - right Fake News?
secret
“testimony” and kangaroo court trials being so very very American, after all
/s