Nancy Pelosi: No Vote on Impeachment Inquiry; Rejects Precedent, Rules

Breitbart ^ | 3 Oct 2019 | Joel B. Pollak

[gswilder]

Hard to believe they are trying to impeach Trump for doing his constitutional duty. Biden is not above the law. Hillary got a pass because she was a dem running for president. So any dem running for president, or any office, cannot be investigated?

Biden did the crime. Not Trump. World is gone crazy.

[DrPretorius]

Let’s have no more “suggestions” about what the constitution really means. If something is not explicitly stated then any “suggestions” are bullshit. And there is no explicit requireent that the Senate must act on any House impeachment.

[Brooklyn Attitude]

“That infuriating witch. What chutzpah to bring up OUR founding fathers and OUR Constitution when she and the other Communist/Dems are working day and night to tear our country apart and end our freedoms.”

Infuriating indeed. A domestic enemy talking about defending the constitution against domestic enemies.

[Bellagio]

LOL! Pelosi and her Dem cabal undermined our election integrity, our security, conspired & committed TREASON by certifying for President an unqualified natural-born fraud, fake-birth certificate holding half-white anti-American Islam loving mulatto Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama!

[rolling_stone]

if nan continues the repubs should start an impeachment inquiry of their own on adam schiff..and nan

[FormerFRLurker]

McConnell is planning to throw President Trump under the bus. I can think of no better explanation for his recent behavior. He has tax cuts passed and Kavanaugh appointed and figures Trump won’t get anything else accomplished. Maybe he’s trying to get his name in the history books?

[wastedyears]

The unwashed and stupid masses will believer her without hesitation.

[dp0622]

Yeah we can DREAM that Rs would vote that away too or that it will ever happen :)

But fantasy is fun sometimes :)

[Repeal 16-17]

Has the Senate ever refused to hold a trial after the House voted to impeach? Simply hold a quickie trial where the House managers look like idiots, followed by a vote coming no where near the two-thirds needed for removal.

[patriotfury]

Not saying this has to be a factor here, but like the Clinton’s, the Feinstein family, the Reid family, the Biden family, and others, the McCon family also received tens of millions of dollars from the ChiComs in the early 1990’s. And maybe much more. They are totally compromised.

Any Senate investigation into the president, if it were at some point widened to include the Bidens, could shine a light on the corruption of many other senators and congressman.

In going after Trump, (who is innocent), any scrutiny on this subject matter is playing with fire...

[gnarledmaw]

Trump: Heres some rope Nancy.
Nancy: Im gonna hang you with it!...(Hands full, need a place to anchor this...MY NECK! YES!...OOOh hes in trouble now...)

[cabbieguy]

If that be true Ms Pelosi, then there is no rule that says the white house or the administration has to appear before your corrupt committee’s.

[CAGOPgramma]

Yet still getting paid as if she’s actually doing the work she was hired for!! Fraud!!

[Cboldt]

Constitutional Crisis
It’s before the Federal Courts in the NAdler demand for grand jury material [Rule 6(e)] case. Nadler is asking it be revealed to Congress to facilitate “a proceeding.”
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/454905-house-panel-to-file-application-for-grand-jury-material-underlying

[CAGOPgramma]

PELOSI is interfering an election.......:deliberately!!! She’s a fraud!!

[GailA]

Standard class travel.

BREAKING: Nancy Pelosi’s Son, Paul Jr. Was Exec At Gas Company That Did Business In Ukraine
https://nationalfile.com/breaking-nancy-pelosis-son-was-exec-at-gas-company-that-did-business-in-ukraine/

[faucetman]

““There is no requirement under the Constitution, House Rules or House PRECEDENT ....”

Well, there isn’t enough of a precedent, only 100% of all presidential impeachment inquiries did the full House vote to authorize an investigation.

[timestax]

bttt

[Jacquerie]

<>However, the Supreme Court ruled in Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224, (1993) that how the Senate tries an impeachment is a "political question," meaning its solely up to the Senate to decide how to hold the trial (except for express Constitutional commands).<>

Excellent point.

So, turn the trial around into a week long indictment of Obama, Holder, Lynch, Rice, Power, Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller.

Call in Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch and Devnin Nunes as witnesses. Enter all the evidence into the Congressional Record.

Don't allow rat witnesses, just as they treated the GOP on the House Intell and Judiciary committees.

Oh, and after week or so of outing Obama's coup, vote to acquit our beloved President.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Sounds like an idea.