Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch: Court Forces Release of Clinton WikiLeaks Discussion Email that Confirms State...
Judicial Watch ^ | September 30, 2019 | Staff

Posted on 09/30/2019 1:07:21 PM PDT by jazusamo

Full title: Judicial Watch: Court Forces Release of Clinton WikiLeaks Discussion Email that Confirms State Department Knew About Her Email Account

'She guards it pretty closely'

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the State Department provided a previously hidden email which shows that top State Department officials used and were aware of Hillary Clinton’s email account.

On December 24, 2010, Daniel Baer, an Obama State Department deputy assistant secretary of state, writes to Michael Posner, a then-assistant secretary of state about Clinton’s private email address:

Baer: “Be careful, you just gave the secretary’s personal email address to a bunch of folks …”

Posner answers: “Should I say don’t forward? Did not notice”

Baer responds: “Yeah-I just know that she guards it pretty closely”

Mr. Posner had forwarded Clinton’s email address, which was contained in an email sent to State Department senior leadership, about WikiLeaks.

It appears the State Department produced this email in 2016 in redacted form , blacking out Clinton’s personal email address and the discussion about Clinton’s wanting to keep her email address closely guarded.

Judicial Watch sought the email after a former top Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) State Department official testified to Judicial Watch about reviewing it between late 2013 and early 2014.

The testimony and the email production comes in discovery granted to Judicial Watch on the Clinton email issue in a FOIA lawsuit ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Clinton also faces potential questioning under oath in this lawsuit.

Despite a recent court order requiring production of the email, the DOJ and State Departments only produced it 10 days ago after Judicial Watch threatened to seek a court order to compel its production.

“Judicial Watch just caught the State Department and DOJ red-handed in another email cover-up – they all knew about the Clinton email account but covered up the smoking-gun email showing this guilty knowledge for years,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

The scope of court-ordered discovery that produces this email find includes: whether Secretary Clinton used private email in an effort to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); whether the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 and 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.

During a recent hearing , Judge Lamberth specifically raised concerns about a Clinton email cache , carterheavyindustries@gmail.com, discussed in a letter to Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) and wants Judicial Watch to “ shake this tree ” on this issue.

Judge Lamberth also criticized the State Department’s handling and production of Clinton’s emails in this case stating, “There is no FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence.”

The court rejected DOJ and State efforts to derail further Judicial Watch discovery. Judge Lamberth called their arguments “preposterous” and cited a prior Judicial Watch FOIA case in which he ordered U.S. Marshals to seize records from a Clinton administration official.

Judge Lamberth detailed how the State Department “spent three months from November 2014 trying to make this case disappear,” and that after discovering the State Department’s actions and omissions, “Now we know more, but we have even more questions than answers. So I won’t hold it against Judicial Watch for expanding their initial discovery request now.”

Judge Lamberth stated his goal was to restore the public’s faith in their government, which may have been damaged because of the Clinton email investigation.

The court granted Judicial Watch seven additional depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Hillary Clinton and her former top aide and current lawyer Cheryl Mills were given 30 days to oppose being deposed by Judicial Watch.

On December 6, 2018, Judge Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

This Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

Judicial Watch’s discovery over the last several months found many more details about the scope of the Clinton email scandal and cover-up:

###


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 201012; 20101224; 2015; baer; billpriestap; cherylmills; clinton; clintonemails; danielbaer; emails; heathersamuelson; hillaryclinton; hillaryemailserver; judgelamberth; judicialwatch; jw; priestap; priests; privateserver; samuelson; statedepartment; tomfitton; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: jazusamo

Judge Lamberth must have good bodyguards


21 posted on 09/30/2019 2:08:45 PM PDT by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So many criminals...so little time.


22 posted on 09/30/2019 2:20:14 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Try to imagine the furor if Sec Pompeo were running a private e-mail server out of his basement, seeking funds for his “foundation” by selling access to President Trump...


23 posted on 09/30/2019 3:02:44 PM PDT by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
And that Sessions clone has said what exactly?

At this point all I have to say anymore is, So what?

24 posted on 09/30/2019 3:16:27 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’ve never seen anyone fired over the Hatch Act! I never even seen anyone made slightly uncomfortable over it. In my experience GOP administration pretend to enforce it, Rat administration’s “What’s a Hatch Act?”.


25 posted on 09/30/2019 3:26:00 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Is there a "live" person at the DOJ who gives a hoot?

Everyone in flyover country wants to contribute to the hemp rope fund to solve the problem(s) with a swift drop from a wooden platform (see Ft. Smith, Arkansas photo).


26 posted on 09/30/2019 3:37:31 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Bush Sr. was running against the Clinton Crime Syndicate at the time.....................


27 posted on 10/01/2019 6:08:03 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Judicial Watch. It’s what it feels like to have a political party.


28 posted on 10/01/2019 6:26:26 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Judge Lamberth also criticized the State Department’s handling and production of Clinton’s emails in this case stating, “There is no FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence.”

So what are you going to do about it, Your Honor?

L


29 posted on 10/01/2019 6:29:02 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Intelligence departments are in need of a purging session question is can it be done fast enough?.


30 posted on 10/01/2019 9:07:28 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

O personally reported this to Diplomatic Security and Informanagement when I was directed to forward an Email for SecState/ HRC22@clintonmail.com on an official business announcement. This happened in 2009.

I have written Trump at Whitehouse.gov and contacted these clowns at Judical Watch and nothing. I have given both permission to FOIA my email account.

I have written this before here about how State blacklisted me and my ambassador in Georgetown Guyana gave me a verbal reprimand and a Ceasse and Disist order from the Secretary’s Office.


31 posted on 10/01/2019 6:02:19 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson