Posted on 09/27/2019 8:10:29 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
The whistleblower’s identity remains obscured, the details of his work for the CIA cloaked in secrecy. But the document he delivered reveals almost as much about the investigative mission he carried out in stealth as it does about the alleged abuses of power by the president.
From the moment he learned about President Trump’s attempts to extract political dirt on former vice president Joe Biden from the newly elected leader of Ukraine on July 25, the CIA officer behind the whistleblower report moved swiftly behind the scenes to assemble material from at least a half-dozen highly placed — and equally dismayed — U.S. officials.
He wove their accounts with other painstakingly gathered material on everything from the intervention of Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani in the U.S.-Ukraine relationship to alleged efforts by American diplomats sent to Kiev and attorneys in the Office of the White House Counsel to contain or suppress the accruing damage.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
So how does a nobody at the CIA get access to private phone calls by the President?
By spying!
Material that is, at best, hearsay.
“So how does a nobody at the CIA get access to private phone calls by the President?
By spying!”
Polygraph every person on the call. Only way to be sure.
Agreed, and notice how the press is twisting it. I’ve never seen anything like this. This isn’t how reporting on Bathhouse Barry was done.
It’s just amazing how media just write one false story after another and the writers get paid to do it. We know this isn’t true based on the transcript of the conversation. The Whistleblower report was false as to the content of the conversation because we have the transcript of the conversation, yet the media continues to report on the Whistleblower report that was released after the transcript as if the allegations of what was supposedly said in the conversation overrules what was actually said in the conversation. Mind blogging dishonesty.
Usually, the false reports of the press are written with technically correct but incomplete information to get the reader or viewer to draw a false inference - in this case, they are just openly and blatantly lying outright repeatedly.
He “wove” a football filed sized tapestry of bullshit from a half inch of tattered thread
Isn’t it amazing a completely anonymous “whistle blower” with 2nd and 3rd hand info allows the Democrats and their Lame Street Media to attempt to bring down a sitting President? Obama said over twenty times the Constitution wouldn’t allow him to give DACA folks amnesty and then all of a sudden give them amnesty but that is otay.
The Whistleblower’s statement reads more like a compilation of office gossip than anything else; yet, it is taken as Gospel truth by those who have fever drams of ridding the White House of the Scary Orange Man who dared to prevent Queen Hillary from taking the throne. As you noted, Obama’s actions (many of which are far worse than even what the press believes that Trump has done) were glossed over or ignored. Obama was their Blessed Messiah, so he could not be allowed to appear to have done anything wrong.
What a pile of crap. If the propaganda is taken out there can’t be more than 5 or 6 words remaining.
The so-called “whistle blower” was not an individual.
The one who put his name to it was chosen to stand in for a team of conspirators that cut and pasted together their “complaint” and some it from already open published sources, needing no “investigation” at all to “uncover”.
Then they took statements from the presidents conversation out of their context in the conversation and appended their own innuendo into them as if Trump had said what the innuendo merely, and suggestively can only imply.
Now altogether it is on those innuendos, not the facts, that they seek impeachment.
The whole thing is an intelligence community group’s attempt to be the ring leaders in a deep state coup de’etat of a president. Pelosi et al are just their messengers, doing what the deep state conspirators wanted done for them.
It was MOVED to a more secure file AFTER the whistleblowers report was submitted.
That makes sense. They weren't hiding it. They were protecting it.
Obama said over twenty times the Constitution wouldn’t allow him to give DACA folks amnesty and then all of a sudden give them amnesty but that is otay.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It was otay because the Constitution says Obama could not be President and BOTH parties cooperated to abrogate it.
The public are sick and tired of the BS even most on the left know it’s killing their party.
The public are sick and tired of the BS even most on the left know it’s killing their party.
Sensationalism and propaganda is quick sand.
“He wove their accounts with other painstakingly gathered material...”
In other words, he created a fictional narrative. Hey, maybe this guy was the source of the “pee pee” dossier too.
The person's twits. A twitter post? Coincidence? Doubt it!
Ned Price https://twitter.com/nedprice/status/1177281176484089856 and read the 'twits'!!!! Verified account @nedprice
I suspect in the coming days we'll be hearing a lot about Section 1.7 of EO 13526. Just a hunch. 10:57 AM - 26 Sep 2019
https://www.redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2019/09/26/guy-ukraine-phone-call-whistleblower/ Is This Guy The Ukraine Phone Call Whistleblower?
Sorry for the no html!
Really scary that this is treated as normal behavior. Blatant coup with the media fully on board. And it goes on and on and on.
All this proves is that no matter how much money was offered those howling for Trump’s blood could not convince any bimbos to make false allegations of sexual abuse. So they had to invent other examples of skullduggery.
Right
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.