Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Really Brought Down the Boeing 737 Max?
New York Times - MSN.com ^ | 20 September 2019 | William Langewiesche

Posted on 09/21/2019 11:38:36 PM PDT by zeestephen

What we had in the two downed airplanes was a textbook failure of airmanship. In broad daylight, these pilots couldn’t decipher a variant of a simple runaway trim, and they ended up flying too fast at low altitude, neglecting to throttle back and leading their passengers over an aerodynamic edge into oblivion. [Extreme length]

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 737; 737max; aerospace; aviation; biased; boeing; boeing737max; corruption; criminalenterprise; crooks; eurotrolls; isis; islam; mcas; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; paidarticle; piloterror; toldyaso; whineywhineygirls; williamlangewiesche
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Moonman62
Despite major differences in aerodynamics, the 737 Max was sold to the airlines by Boeing as flying like the familiar 737. A sophisticated sensor and computer system was thought to assure such an experience for the flight crew. Remarkably, a safety package was made an expensive option -- one that cash-strapped Third World airlines rarely chose.

Early on, skilled American pilots who trained on the 737 Max recognized that its sensors and computer system could sometimes behave in a way that misled pilots and put the aircraft at risk. Good airmanship and quick reactions were then required to avoid disaster. Boeing never remedied the risk or explained it to pilots and customer airlines.

Starting about fifteen or twenty years ago, shop talk at a party among airline pilots I knew turned against Boeing as getting sloppy and outdated, with sometimes cheap and inferior build quality when compared to Airbus models. The pilots correctly anticipated that Boeing was going to have loads of trouble in building the 787.

Boeing has lost its way, looking to profit through marketing and financial strength instead of engineering quality. The 737 MAX is a fiasco. Blaming the pilots who died flying it will do little to remedy Boeing's problems.

21 posted on 09/22/2019 4:13:32 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Ship
Re: Asian-Indian software engineers

Both Boeing and the Indian software company have made public statements that NONE of the software written in India was involved in ANY part of the two crash investigations.

22 posted on 09/22/2019 4:27:47 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

No mention of Abdul-Majeed Marouf Ahmed Alani who worked on 737’s and arrested for tampering with these planes. That has ties to ISIS. I guess it’s “racists” to point that out.


23 posted on 09/22/2019 4:28:26 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Now it emerges that the latest iteration of the A320 has a similar issue. The New A320 also has the LEAP engine. But Boeing is the only manufacturer being demonized by the media.


24 posted on 09/22/2019 4:29:40 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Simply holding on to the trim wheel will stop any automatic movement whether it’s from MCAS or anything else.


25 posted on 09/22/2019 5:13:43 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Re: Muslim Connection

Near the end of this essay, the author made a vague religious reference to the cockpit audio of one of the Indonesian pilots....

“He gave a few feeble inputs of nose-up trim with his thumb switch and began calling on God for a miracle.”

My first thought....

Allahu Akbar?

But the author dropped it right there and did not explain further.

As I recall, the Muslim pilot who flew a trans-Atlantic jumbo from Brazil into the ocean about 10 years ago was chanting Allahu Akbar during the descent.

26 posted on 09/22/2019 5:20:04 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

One of the two planes that crashed, had the same problem the day before. An extra experienced pilot riding up front saw what was happening and instructed to turn the system off.

And there is the critical difference between today’s aircraft and aircraft of 30 or 50 years ago; fly-by-wire systems today. No amount of “airmanship” can overcome a fatally flawed software system which intercedes in control of the aircraft to disastrous consequence. The only ‘fix’ in these circumstances is to disable those computer systems.


27 posted on 09/22/2019 5:35:07 AM PDT by Flick Lives (MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

Aviation ping


28 posted on 09/22/2019 5:38:12 AM PDT by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Good to know, but was the trick and its life-saving potential made clear and taught in 737 MAX training? I doubt it. And why not make the aircraft safe from odd, deadly maneuvers that could not be controlled through intuitive reactions by pilots of ordinary skill? Supposedly, Boeing planned a software upgrade to do just that. Too bad they were not quick enough to avert two air crashes.


29 posted on 09/22/2019 5:46:19 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
“Airmanship” is an anachronistic word, but it is applied without prejudice to women as well as men.

Oh for gawd’s sake. Was this sentence really necessary in the article? Can’t the Slimes write an informative article about a topic without including some “#woke” language to insult the reader?

30 posted on 09/22/2019 6:06:21 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Alani tampered / disabled the air speed sensor, which I read is related to the Boeing MAX 737 malfunctions. I would love confirmation. Boeing will too, no doubt.


31 posted on 09/22/2019 6:11:35 AM PDT by chiller (As Davey Crockett once said: Be sure you're right. Then go ahead. I'm goin' ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Good to know, but was the trick and its life-saving potential made clear and taught in 737 MAX training?

...

It’s not a trick. It’s in the manual and isn’t specific to the 737 MAX or MCAS. Every pilot who has to know what to do in case of trim problems should know it.


32 posted on 09/22/2019 6:25:29 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

“...at the very least warned all subsequent pilots of that plane about the problem and the solution.”

SOLUTION? The correct “solution” would have been to not fly that plane until the problem was found and corrected.

Meaning that plane would be sitting on the ground (in ONE piece) today. And all of its passengers would have still made it to their destinations ALIVE!

If your plane tries to crash “itself”, here’s what you do.....

Problem solved!


33 posted on 09/22/2019 6:28:37 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Well, I guess there would be no reason for them to lie about that.


34 posted on 09/22/2019 6:42:06 AM PDT by Liberty Ship ("Lord, make me fast and accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Laslo Fripp

If you put enough engines on a bathtub, it will fly.


35 posted on 09/22/2019 6:46:05 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Ping


36 posted on 09/22/2019 6:55:06 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The 737 NG made some unfortunate changes that were carried over to the 737 MAX:

(1) Smaller manual trim wheels on the 737 NG and 737 MAX made it more difficult to trim a runaway stabilizer back into a regular position;

(2) The larger stabilizer surface in both models made it more difficult to counter a runaway stabilizer by using the elevator, which was kept at the same size; and,

(3) 737 NG and MAX pilots were not taught a tricky rollercoaster maneuver that is the only way in those models to recover from severe mistrim and free a locked elevator -- but the maneuver requires 3,000 feet of altitude to spare.

As it was, the Boeing MCAS computer flight system flew the Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max into the ground as the pilots cut power to the stabilizer's electric motor and frantically tried using the trim wheel to recover control.

37 posted on 09/22/2019 7:05:51 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
I was a Naval Aviator. . . notice aviator not pilot. A big difference!

The selections and training was very demanding but the output was someone who could fly and manage an aircraft under almost impossible conditions.

Civil flying is straight-and-level and for gods sake don't upset the passengers. That and the push to save costs today's airplanes are designed for the computer to fly and the pilot to manage the computer (if allowed to do that). Basic air work, situational awareness and experience gained from intensive training, lessons learned and ‘the school of hard knocks’ are being lost.

Lose the computer and you might get lucky and catch up with the airplane before you spatter. Look at Air France putting a perfectly good A330 (Google AF447) into the Atlantic because they could not manage a simple lose of instrumentation. These two 737 Max are crews that did not have a clue and it killed them and a bunch of people that thought those up front knew what they were doing.

OK, rant off.

38 posted on 09/22/2019 7:08:57 AM PDT by lowbuck (The Blue Card (US Passport) Don't leave home without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

As it was, the Boeing MCAS computer flight system flew the Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max into the ground as the pilots cut power to the stabilizer’s electric motor and frantically tried using the trim wheel to recover control.

...

Actually, they reactivated the automatic trim before the final pitch down.

At that point they were in an overspeed condition. If they had been competent pilots they would have pulled back on the throttles and MCAS would have been deactivated automatically. They didn’t need to know that MCAS existed.


39 posted on 09/22/2019 7:30:27 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

If your plane tries to crash “itself”, here’s what you do.....


Reminds me of how planes took aim at the towers and Pentagon on 9/11...


40 posted on 09/22/2019 7:35:38 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson