Posted on 09/16/2019 8:58:34 AM PDT by Enlightened1
In a major twist, NYTimes editorial was pressured to make a correction to it’s bombshell story about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, that the “alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault in question at all.”
Editors’ Note says: “An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book’s account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
But NYTimes editors also omitted another important detail, that Max Stier, the accuser who “saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student,” worked as a Clinton defense attorney, or Stier’s legal battles with Kavanaugh during the Whitewater investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
All these false, silly accusations prepare the field for a nomination of a woman to the Supreme Court: Amy Comey Barrett?
Amy would not have a penis to create irrational accusations; I guess the Dems would have to resort to their second [or third?] group of enemies - Catholics. They may be polishing up their list of questions now - all centering on abortion as a leftist sacrament.
Don’t you love how Democrats claim to be so tolerant?
No surprise. This was well orchestrated, and synchronized.
It was no accident or coincidence that! ...................
This was well orchestrated, and synchronized.
—
Yup. And the “walk back” means nothing. The headline gets added to the “weight of evidence” (actually zero, but in the leftist mind large) against Kavanaugh.
We weren’t supposed to know that, or find it out....
And now that we have, is this just supposed to be “payback” for how Clinton was abused by Ken Starr?
Fact is, Slick was treated VERY gently by Starr, as there were several glaring infractions of the law, much more serious than simply lying to investigative authorities under oath, relating to very real malfeasance of office and international selling of secrets to enemy regimes. But that was considered too shameful to make any of it public, and it was simply hushed up, as this could be a very devastating precedent to set up.
This is just a very vicious and malicious attack against a Clinton “enemy”.
so when IS enough enough?????? Everyone MUST write letters to the editor, push back on those lousy lefty articles in your local papers.
Also, we need to keep FREEPER page alive and well. Please consider being a monthly donor. Even a few bucks can help Jim keep the lights on. PLEASE???
Thanks so much.
At some point, the Times people will go and insult some guy, and he’s going to ask that instead of money....he wants them shutdown for 30 days. They will laugh, then he’ll ask for the $100-million instead.
It seems that there are signs that Ruthie is close to her final dirt nap. Hopefully this is the case. I will hoist one up when she does and just sit back and watch the asinine spectacle of the left sh*t themselves.
p
The same liberal crowd salivating over the whereabouts of Kavanaugh’s penis gave Bill Clinton a pass for his Oral Office activity-——
using their patented Live-To-Regret defense “it was only sex”........which unleashed priapic sex-crazed Harvey Weinstein.
NEW LOWS FOR POWER-CRAZY DEMOCRAPS-—the slash and burn political strategy
They cant get votes on their accomplishments, political acumen or voter respect. They resort to smearing, law-breaking and other con games.
Dems are social predators and sociopaths with no conscience and in a perfect world, would be hunted down and caged for the protection of humanity and society.
Defending the Constitution and serving the American people isn’t for the Democrats.
Democraps are totally amoral; they worship power and money only.
The National Enquirer has offered to send over some of their senior editors to assist the New York Times with basic ethics.. They’ll be bringing their style book with them...
OMG - THAT’S PERFECT!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEegLbwWsAAg6Su.jpg
AND the New York Times is so vile - - vile enough to believe the first slut walking up to their propaganda factory.
The New York Times sucks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
