Posted on 09/11/2019 10:54:00 AM PDT by real saxophonist
Recently Walmart banned a man from all of their stores' nationwide for open carrying in a Kentucky Walmart after someone called the police to say that an armed man was inside the store acting suspiciously.
Amyway, during our training, they told us the only entity in the country with better technology is the U.S. government.
A few days ago, a fisherman at a Texas lake hauled up a Galil! Dang it, I never hook anything that interesting. Just goes to show - boating accidents... the struggle is real!
:-)
Penis analogies, are those a specialty of yours?
I know what a valid analogy looks like — walking into a store “open- carrying “ your member is not protected by the Constitution, and in fact can get you arrested on a variety of charges, including indecent exposure or possibly corruption of a minor, etc.
If you think it’s a valid analogy then go to Wal-Mart with your tiny member on display, see if they 1) try to give you a yellow-dog style contract agreeing to being banned from all Wal-Marts, or 2) get arrested for reasons cited above.
I await your result. Remember, you only get one phone call.
who does WalMart think it is, google?
MY tiny member, eh?
Chuckle.
Everybody knows a an obsessive need to display a gun just might be a way of compensating.
Otherwise, tucking it out of sight wouldn’t get you so riled up. Have a nice evening.
Have they put up any freaking signs yet, if not then still legal!
It was your failed penile analogy, not mine — now you think guns are phallic symbols, continuing your obsession with the male appendage. Creepy.
“Anyone can claim to be a protected class in one form or another in any situation.”
It’s not enough to “claim to be a protected class”, they would have to demonstrate that the discrimination was based on their membership in a protected class, or the case would get tossed out of court in short order.
Aww. Now you’re whimpering.
You’re the one speculating about,and claiming to know-—the size of my “member.” THAT’S creepy.
Which means my analogy didn’t fail at all, it landed right on target.
I’m saying, My gun, like my “member” will remain inside my pants, thank you.
The size of either will remain for me to know, and you to find out— which *my* preference would be never.
In a justice system loaded up with bleeding heart liberal judges and juries? Just wearing a pink shirt to court, or coming in using a walking cane would end it in their favor. They don’t have to prove anything at all, all they have to do is claim it. YOU bear the burden of proof and would have to prove THEY ARE NOT. And it has now gone beyond just the protected classes, just a historical example of how it works now if it goes to court.
http://volokh.com/2010/05/25/some-strange-consequences-of-public-accommodations-laws/
Please do, along with other silly invalid analogies.
The size of either will remain for me to know, and you to find out— which *my* preference would be never.
I destroyed your argument. Did you make it past 8th grade?
Nice!
.45?
“I destroyed your argument. Did you make it past 8th grade?”
Atually no, you didn’t destroy my argument, because you never understood the argument & completely mischaracterized the parameters of it.
In your determination to have the last word, now you’re resorting to paraphrasing my insult grenades & tossing them back.
To wit, I already asked YOU, How old are you, twelve?!
LOL.
At any rate, I’m tired of wasting my time arguing with an idiot.
Strap on your six-shooter & go argue with Walmart’s “corporate abusers.”
If you want to have the last word. knock yourself out.
I’m done.
Reprise
...walking into a store “open- carrying “ your member is not protected by the Constitution, and in fact can get you arrested on a variety of charges, including indecent exposure or possibly corruption of a minor, etc
Post from “School of Rational Thought” on another thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3777923/posts
Here’s why all of us should care:
OPEN CARRY WITHOUT A CPL:
1. Open carry allows 18-20 year old adults to engage in self defense outside the home.
2. Open carry allows those financially unable to pay the $200-$300 cost of obtaining a CPL to engage in self defense outside the home.
3. Open carry allows those who don’t meet the long list of disqualifiers for a CPL to engage in self defense outside the home.
4. Open carry doesn’t require permission from the state in the form of a license to engage in self defense outside the home.
OPEN CARRY WITH A CPL:
1. Open carry is simply a more comfortable form of carry for some people, especially those using an OWB holster, those carrying a larger handgun or long gun, and during the warmer months.
2. Open carry may provide a tactical advantage for some people due to body types or physical limitations allowing for a faster draw.
3. Michigan’s convoluted firearms laws allow open carry in some places where concealed carry is banned.
4. Open carry has a social element that concealed carry lacks encouraging conversations and education about legal gun ownership.
Ceding liberties because they don’t apply to you is not in the best interest of liberty.
“Oh,Brother,,,!”
My thoughts too.
Because that is the only way many people will ever see a gun on the hip of a law abiding citizen.
I OC who ever I can. I did tonight to the local Farmers Market and few people even notice.
I can show you hundreds of stories of 0eople carry concelead getting attacked.
But people who OC and are attacked? That is as rare as an honest liberal.
Criminals are not stupid. They are not going to attack someone who is carrying a gun and knows how to use it.
CONGRATULATIONS!
You're the first "Woke Capitalism Zombie" I've seen on this thread!
Give the man a banana.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.