Posted on 09/08/2019 10:33:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
A “population control” proposal pushed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) will target “black and brown” people, unborn children, the sick, and elderly people, said Dr. Alveda King, director of Priests for Life’s Civil Rights for the Unborn project and the niece of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., in a Friday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with hosts Rebecca Mansour and special guest host Rick Manning. During a Wednesday “town hall” hosted by CNN regarding “climate change,” Sanders accepted the premise of population growth on Earth being “unsustainable,” requiring government controls over procreation.
Sanders’s proposal, said King, reminded her of the 1973 dystopian science fiction film Soylent Green, in which overpopulation and poverty was addressed through euthanization of the elderly and processing their remains into food.
“In light of the shocking [statements] that we just heard about population control and all of that, cannibalism, many years ago, I watched a movie with Charlton Heston,” recalled King. “It was called Soylent Green, and they were concerned about population growth and all that and the old people were living too long, so they came up with this delicious wafer that they began to feed the public with, and it turns out that Soylent Green was people, the older people, and they were told that they were going to Nirvana… and then they processed them and put them in this little green wafer, and I thought about that when I heard this particular report, and I said, ‘My God, they’re turning us into cannibals.'”
LISTEN:
https://soundcloud.com/breitbart/breitbart-news-tonight-dr-alveda-king-september-6-2019
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Mr. Sanders needs to crawl back under the rock he came from.
How can she say that? (smile)
Blacks don’t seem to mind it now.
BLM: Oh yeah. Right...
I would LOVE him as the Dem candidate. Can you imagine what Trump would do with him? LOL
Nope. Let him continue to shine a light on what the Democrats really are.
For at least 50 years, abortion pushers have targeted black and Hispanic babies in their mother’s wombs.
Abortion and Race!
For decades, abortion has disproportionately eliminated minority babies.
The CDC reports that during the 1970’s, roughly 24% of all U.S. abortions were performed on black women. That percentage rose to 30% in the 1980’s, 34% in the 1990’s and has held at 36% throughout the 2000’s. That means that about 31% of all U.S. abortions since 1973 have been performed on African American women.
Based on the January 2018 estimate that there have been 60 million abortions in the United States since 1973, we can deduce that well over 18 million of them were performed on black babies.
As of July 2017, the black population in the U.S. stood somewhere around 40 million, which means that abortion has reduced the size of the black community by more than 30%—and that doesn’t include the children and grandchildren that would have been born to those aborted more than a generation ago.
https://abort73.com/abortion/abortion_and_race/
Of course they will.
I believe it’s said that in America half of black babies are aborted. Then there’s those kids the murdered babies might have had (early victims after Roe could have even been grandparents by now).
Least we forget why planned parenthood was created. The organization was founded to kill dark skinned babies.
JoMa
Bernie’s got nothing to worry about. As a member of the “Inner Party” he won’t be one of the old people who are forced to take a pill.
Believe it or not, Margaret Sanger opposed abortion.
Birth control was her thing.
From a post of mine back in 2017: please note especially the first paragraph highlighted and quoted below from the Liberty Fund Library "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), Chapter 1, final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay, "The Impracticability of Socialism":
Note the writer's emphasis that the "scheme of Socialism" requires what he calls "the power of restraining the increase in population"--long the essential and primary focus of the Democrat Party in the U. S.:
"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.
I.44
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classes—the class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
I.45
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal life—imperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive strides—broadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so.
I.46
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove." EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON
I love Alveda King. She has all the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and is not afraid to use them!
To counter attack that democrat (in name only I call em PervcoCrats) party approach, The GOP should be using this approach;
TIME TO BRING THIS UP
During the period after the civil war known as reconstruction black legislators who were Republican not only in southern states but also northern were elected . To stop this south democrats came up with segregation, poll taxes, and Jim Crow laws, and the KKK.
I’m shocked he hasn’t been labeled a racist.
Oh that’s right he’s a democrat
I guess limiting immigration to our country is out of the question...
Methinks Sanger's position on infanticide was motivated by pragmatism rather than conviction, since publicly promoting birth control at that time was extremely divisive ...
Where do these idiots think they get the authority to go waaaay out the Job Description
“Believe it or not, Margaret Sanger opposed abortion.”
Birth control, abortion, tossing a baby off a bridge; really, what’s the difference?
“Believe it or not, Margaret Sanger opposed abortion.”
Birth control, abortion, tossing a baby off a bridge; really, what’s the difference?
Actually, Bernie is the perfect candidate to be the RAT nominee.
He IS the face of the communist party in America today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.