Posted on 08/27/2019 5:27:48 AM PDT by mplc51
lhan Omar with her father and sister. (PowerLine)
According to Steinberg there is credible evidence that Ilhan Omar and her family changed their name to illegally enter the United States back in 1995.
And since that time Ilhan Omar as an adult continued to defy US law. According to Steinberg Rep. Omar committed at least eight instances of perjury going back to 2009. The charges could carry up to 40 years of prison time or deportation.
Obviously, Ilhan Omar has no regard for US law and yet here she is representing Minnesota in the US Congress and a sitting member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
David Steinberg reported on Ilhan’s criminal activity.
David Steinberg concluded his July report with this list of possible crimes committed by Ilhan Omar.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I JUST LEARNED
BILL BARR WAS AG
WHEN RANDY WEAVER’S WIFE AND SON
WERE MURDERED
BY BATF RON HARIUCHI IN 1992
.
I UNDERSTAND NOW
THE DELAY WE FACE FOR PROSECUTIONS
OF THE KNOWN CRIMINALS
Absolutely..! And I sure justice is about to catch up with them.... Any minute now... :(
Well Steinberg still has to prove there was a fraud and that may rely on witness testimony back in Somalia. If there are official records in Somalia that show she and her family assumed the name Omar, then she may be in trouble.
I think next year she gets voted out and it won’t matter. She’s at 9% which even in the face of political polling unreliability is a number that doesn’t bode well.
But I sense there is an undercurrent forming made up of frustration that Democrats are not being indicted and prosecuted whereas Republicans are fair game to throw in jail for slights having nothing to do with a prosecutor’s focus.
So this Omar matter may be disappointing for conservatives.
There’s an open bunk in the Epstein prison.
Keep believeing that. I believed, against my better judgment, up until a few days ago that Hillary Clinton would be prosecuted for her crimes. Then reality hit me.
Jim Hoft is full of sh!t. How can a month old report from Powerline be BREAKING?
FYI the sniper’s name is Lon Horiuchi.
The change of name is important as part of showing that she married her brother, a much more recent infraction.
Which law enforcement agency is doing the accusing? Has this been referred for trial? Has a grand jury been impaneled?
If the answer to all these questions are No, what is the purpose of this month-old article?
Doesn't change the fact of Bill Barr.
Nobody cares, she’s a protected class, a Democrat.
The actual point is that muslims do NOT recognize any non-islamic law. When will these so called law makers get this? They are playing at following US law to gain their foothold.
The US must ban Sharia Law, all muslim law! They must be forced to bend the knee or leave America. Just as European nations are beginning to ban the burka. That is only one aspect. Their way of killing animals is inhumane everything about their so called religion is an anathema to western civilization.
Judicial Watch Files Ethics Complaint against Rep. Ilhan Omar Alleging Immigration, Marriage, and Tax Fraud
Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch just made their move to get to the bottom of the many controversies swirling around Ilhan Omar.
Fitton is demanding an immediate House investigation into Omar based on enormous evidence of possible wrongdoing – some admitted by Omar herself.
Omar has admitted to making some mistakes on her taxes and on how her campaign handled some money and payments and faced minor disciplinary action from Minnesota.
This is the full complaint filed by Tom Fitton:
Ethics Complaint Against Rep. Ilhan Omar Concerning Possible Violations of Federal and State Law
Dear Chairman Skaggs,
Judicial Watch is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation, promoting transparency, accountability and integrity in government and fidelity to the rule of law. We regularly monitor congressional ethics issues as part of our anti-corruption mission.
This letter serves as an official complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).
Substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.
Such violations would also breach the Code of Ethics for Government Service, to which all federal officeholders are subject, “Any person in Government service should uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.”) Rep. Omar actions in this suspected immigration fraud, marriage fraud, perjurious statements on her Minnesota divorce filings, and falsifications on her tax returns, merit your immediate investigation.
In the words of investigative reporter David Steinberg: “The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.”
The evidence developed against Rep. Omar was the result of a three-year-long investigation in both the United States and the United Kingdom by Mr. Steinberg and his investigative reporter colleagues Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson. It is supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.
Documented-based reporting by Steinberg, et al. has developed the following information: Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a citizen of the United States, married her biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, in 2009, presumably as part of an immigration fraud scheme. The couple legally divorced in 2017. In the course of that divorce, Ms. Omar submitted an “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” to the State of Minnesota on August 2, 2017 and claimed, among other things, that she had had no contact with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi after June 2011. She also claimed that she did know where to find him. The evidence developed by Mr. Steinberg and his colleagues demonstrates with a high degree of certainty that Ms. Omar not only had contact with Mr. Elmi, but actually met up with him in London in 2015, which is supported by photographic evidence. Ms. Omar signed the “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” under penalty of perjury. The very document that Ilham Omar signed on August 2, 2017 bears the following notation directly above her signature: “I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct. Minn. Stat. § 358.116.”
Of particular importance are archived photographs taken during a widely reported trip by Ilhan Omar to London in 2015, posted to her own Instagram account under her nickname “hameey”, in which she poses with her husband/presumed brother, Ahmed Elmi. These photographs from 2015 are documentary evidence that in fact she met up with Mr. Elmi after June 2011 and before the date she signed the divorce document in August 2017, thereby calling into question the veracity of her claim that she had not seen Mr. Elmi since June 2011.
Rep. Omar’s potential crimes far exceed perjurious statements made in a Minnesota court filing.
Rep. Omar’s conduct may include immigration fraud. It appears that Rep. Omar married her brother in order to assist his emigration to the United Stated from the United Kingdom. The same immigration fraud scheme may have aided Mr. Elmi in obtaining federally-backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University. Mr. Elmi and Rep. Omar simultaneously attended North Dakota State University and may have derived illicit benefits predicated on the immigration fraud scheme.
The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars. More significantly, the Board discovered that the federal tax returns submitted by Rep. Omar for 2014 and 2015 were filed as “joint” tax returns with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.
Under federal law, specifically, 26 U.S. Code & 7206.1, “Any person who willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter … shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.”
Rep. Omar’s federal tax returns must be examined to determine whether any additional falsifications were made.
Mr. Steinberg, et al. have engaged in meticulous research and reporting over a period of years. They have demonstrated with a high degree of probability that Rep. Ilhan Omar has violated House Ethics Rules, federal and state laws.
We call upon the Office of Congressional Ethics to launch an investigation into Rep. Omar’s conduct immediately.
Sincerely,
Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch
The House ethics chair is a Dem in a Dem majority. Nothing going to happen here.
The government elite are not subject to prosecution. There are too many recent examples to mention.
Must be good friends with Joe Biden and his Joe Biden School of Perjury. The libs attend this more than actors do Strasberg.
rwood
BREAKING! HOFT BLOG USES “BREAKING” IN BLOG HEADLINE, POSTS BLOG CLICKBAIT UNDER NEWS!
It doesn’t matter unless it was a Shiria Court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.